Global South: Conceptual Approaches and SocioEconomic Processes
Abstract
In a dynamic world, developing in the direction of polycentricism, the countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America, forming together the so-called Global South, are increasingly prominent. Today, the Global South comprises nearly two-thirds of the UN member states, accounts for about 80% of the world’s population, about 50% of world GDP and about a half of total international trade. These dry figures alone point to the paramount methodological, scientific and practical importance of studying the economic and socio-political issues of the Global South, a comprehensive analysis of its role in the world economy and politics, in the globalization, and also in geoeconomic and geopolitical relations. Equally relevant is the analysis of the Global South’s participation in the international community’s efforts to combat global challenges, including climate change, the eradication of poverty, the fight against cross-border terrorism and drug trafficking, humanity’s victory over the COVID-19 pandemic and the launch of the recovery economic growth undermined by the coronacrisis. According to the author’s of the article point of view, the former colonial and dependent countries forming the Global
South, many of which have achieved state independence in the last 50-60 years, have accumulated considerable experience of joint actions to defend their economic and political interests, established mechanisms and organizations of cooperation in a variety of fields. Far from simplifying the extremely difficult present situation and not turning a blind eye to existing problems and difficulties, it is logical to assume that a rich historical experience and a large international weight can enable the countries of the Global South to participate actively in building a more sustainable, just and secure world order.
About the Author
P. P. YakovlevRussian Federation
Petr P. Yakovlev - DSc in Economics, Chief Researcher of the Department of Europe and America.
117418, Nakhimovsky Av., 51/21, Moscow
References
1. Abramova I.O., Fituni L.L. (2017) Potential of the African Continent in the Development Strategy of the Russian Economy. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 61, no 9, pp. 24-35 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-9-24-35
2. Ananyin O.I., Khaitkulov R.G., Shestakov D.E. (2010) Washington Consensus: Landscape after Battle. World Economy and International Relations, no 12, pp. 1527.
3. Available at: https://economics.hse.ru/data/2011/02/14/1208909692/2010%20%D0%9C%D0%AD%D0%9C%D0%9E.pdf, accessed 31.01.2021 (in Russian).
4. Anghie A. (2015) Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order. Humanity Journal, vol. 6, no 1, pp. 145-158. DOI: 10.1353/hum.2015.0016
5. Avakov R.M., Bragina E.A., Maydan-ik K.L., Mirskiy G.I., Pokatayeva T.S., Tya-gunenko V.L. (eds.) (1974) Developing Countries: Patterns, Trends, Perspectives, Moscow: Misl’ (in Russian).
6. Ayau Cordon M.F. (1993) La Decada Perdida, Guatemala: CEES.
7. Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States (1974). General Assembly Document A/RES/29/3281 of 12 December 1974. UN Documents. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm, accessed 27.10.2020.
8. Clift J. (2003) Beyond the Washington Consensus. Finance & Development, vol. 40, no 3, pp. 9.
9. Cox R. (1979) Ideologies and the New International Economic Order: Reflections on Some Recent Literature. International Organization, vol. 33, no 2, pp. 257302. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300032161 Dados N., Connell R. (2012) The Global South. Contexts, vol. 11, no 1, pp. 12-13. DOI: 10.1177/1536504212436479
10. Declaration for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order (1974). United Nations General Assembly Document A/RES/S-6/3201 of 1 May 1974. UN Documents. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/s6r3201.htm, accessed 29.10.2020.
11. Dynkin A. A., Ivanova N.I. (eds.) (2011) Russia in the Polycentric World, Moscow: The Whole World (in Russian).
12. Ffrench-Davis R., Tironi R. (eds.) (2014) Latin America and the New Economic Order, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
13. Frank A.G. (1967) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, New York: NYU Press.
14. Frank A.G. (1979) On Capitalism Underdevelopment, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
15. Fukuyama F. (2011) Falling Behind, London: Oxford University Press.
16. International Monetary Fund (2020). World Economic Outlook. A Long and Difficult Ascent. Washington, October.
17. ITC. Trade Statistics for International Business Development. Available at: https://www.trademap.org/index.aspx, accessed 19.11.2020
18. Korolev I.S. (eds.) (2002) World Economy: Global Trends for 100 Years, Moscow: Economist (in Russian).
19. Kuvaldin V. (2017) Global World. Policy. Economy. Social Relations, Moscow: The Whole World (in Russian).
20. Kuznetsov A.V. (eds.) (2020) The Trump Phenomenon, Moscow: INION (in Russian).
21. Li X., Brodsgaard K.E., Jacobsen M. (2009) Beijing Consensus: Ten Economic Principles. China Economic Journal, vol. 2, no 3, pp. 297-311. DOI: 10.1080/17538960903529535
22. Melyantsev V.A. (2019) China and the United States, Who Whom: Comparing the Main Parameters of Economic Development. Asia and Africa today, no 8, pp. 5-14 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S0322150750005767-5
23. Misra K.P. (1993) Nonalignment in International Relations, New Delhi.
24. Napoleoni L. (2011) Maonomics. La amarga medicina china contra los escanda-los de nuestra economia, Barcelona: Paidos.
25. Pertas J., Veltnayer H. (eds.) (2004) Las privatizaciones y la desnacionalizacion de America Latina, Buenos Aires: Prometeo libros.
26. Prashad V. (2007) The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World, New York: The New Press.
27. Rodney W. (1972) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, London: Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications.
28. Rothstein R.L. (1979) Global Bargaining: UNCTAD and the Quest for a New International Economic Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29. Sajed A. (2020) From the Third World to the Global South. E-International Relations, July 27, 2020. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/07/27/from-the-third-world-to-the-global-south/, accessed 16.11.2020.
30. Scholte J.A. (2005) Globalization: A Critical Introduction, Basingstoke: Pal-grave MacMillan.
31. SDGF. South-South Cooperation. Available at: https://www.sdgfund.org/south-south-cooperation, accessed 19.11.2020.
32. Stavrianos L.S. (1981) Global Rift: The Third World Comes of Age, New York: Morrow.
33. The World Bank (2020). World Development Indicators. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators, accessed 19.11.2020.
34. Williamson J., Kuczynski P.-P. (eds.) (2003) After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, Washington: Institute for International Economics.
35. Yakovlev P. (2018) Argentina and Brazil: from Military Nuclear Programs to National Atomic Energy. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 11, no 6, pp. 109-127 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-6-109-127
36. Yakovlev P., Yakovleva N. (2020) Protest Potential of the Latin America: Regional Aspect of Global Phenomenon. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 64, no 7, pp. 89-99 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-7-89-99
37. Yergin D. (1991) The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power, New York: Simon & Schuster.
38. Young R.J.C. (2016) Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Review
For citations:
Yakovlev P.P. Global South: Conceptual Approaches and SocioEconomic Processes. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021;14(2):6-27. (In Russ.)