Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Das Kind Mit Dem Bade Ausschütten? U.S. Federal School Reform in Early 21ST Century

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-2-63-81

Abstract

Grounded in analysis of specific features of the federal school reform  undertaken in the U.S. in early 21st century, this article demonstrates that the U.S. government attempted to reduce  the number of students lagging behind and thus to increase  students’ average performance by means of stimulating them to  transfer from underperforming to better schools, including from  public schools to schools of other types, which offer higher quality of  teaching. The article distinguishes three stages of the reform. On the first stage, in late 20th century, new types of schools emerged in the  U.S.: in addition to pre-existent public, private and religious schools, as well as home schooling, magnet schools  emerged in 1970s, and charter schools emerged in 1990s. On the  second stage, during George W. Bush Administration, U.S.  government assumed the powers to stimulate transfer of students  from underperforming public schools to charter schools, and to  stimulate increase in the number of charter schools. On the third  stage, during Barack Obama Administration and the first year of Donald Trump Administration, U.S. government faced the  impossibility to significantly increase the number of charter schools, to stimulate mass transfer of students from public schools  to charter schools, and to significantly improve average students’  performance over short time. Even if U.S. government assumes the  powers to stimulate transfer of students also to private schools, as  Donald Trump Administration proposed, it will hardly have a positive  effect in the short run. The article concludes that the model of school reform applied in the U.S. cannot solve the puzzle, because it  concentrates available resources around elite schools, while most  students lagging behind concentrate around traditional public schools.

About the Author

D. A. LANKO
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

PhD in Politics, Associate Professor, Department of European Studies

Address: 7/9, Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation



References

1. A Nation At Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform (1983). U.S. Department of Education. Available at: https://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html, accessed 27.02.2018.

2. Boyd D. (2003) The Current State Fiscal Crisis and Its Aftermath. Report to the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Available at: https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.word-press.com/2013/01/the-current-state- fiscal-crisis-and-its-aftermath-pdf.pdf, accessed 27.02.2018.

3. Brill S. (2012) Class Warfare: Inside the Fight to Fix America’s Schools. New York: Simon and Schuster.

4. Brown E., McLaren M. (2016) How Indiana’s School Voucher Program Soared, and What It Says about Education in the Trump Era. Washington Post, December 26, 2016. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/how-indianas-school-voucher- program-soaredand-what-it-says-about-education-inthe-trump- era/2016/12/26/13d1d3ecbc97-11e6-91ee-1adddfe36cbe_story.html? utm_term=.19c76e79ed13, accessed 27.02.2018.

5. Clabaugh G.K. (2004) The Educational Legacy of Ronald Reagan. Educational Horizons, no 82, pp. 256–259.

6. Cohen E.S. (2001) The Politics of Globalization in the United States. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

7. Cooper K.J. (1999) ‘89 Education Summit’s Goals Still Unmet. Washington Post, December 3, 1999. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/12/03/89-educationsummits-goals-still-unmet/eaddd5a4-691b-4288-b50f-9a3aceaff979/?utm_term=.8fba0ff5c6f9, accessed 27.02.2018.

8. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1965). U.S. Department of Education. Available at: https://www2.ed.gov/documents/essa-act-of-1965.pdf, accessed 27.02.2018.

9. Finn C.E. (2008) Troublemaker: A Personal History of School Reform since Sputnik. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

10. Genin V.E. (2008) Sovremennye innovatsionnye tendentsii v vysshem obrazovanii SShA [Contemporary Innovative Tendencies in Higher Education in the U.S.]. Vestnik of Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 20: Pedagogicheskoe Obrazovanie, no 2, pp. 34–39.

11. H.R.1 – No Child Left Behind Act (2002). U.S. Congress. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/1, accessed 27.02.2018. H.R.1804 – Goals 2000: Educate America

12. Act (1994). U.S. Congress. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd- congress/house-bill/1804, accessed 27.02.2018.

13. Hackett U. (2017) Offers and Throffers: Education Policy under Obama. The Obama Presidency and the Politics of Change (eds. Ashbee E., Dumbrell J.). London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181–198.

14. Maranto M., McShane M.Q., Rhinesmith E. (2016) Education Reform in the Obama Era: The Second Term and the 2016 Election. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Marusenko M.A. (2016) Globalizatsiya i reforma obrazovaniya v SShA [Globalization and Education Reform in the U.S.]. SShА i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul’tura, no 5, pp. 64–73.

15. Multiple Choice: Charter School Performance in 16 States University (2009). CREDO, Center for Research in Education Outcomes at Stanford. Available at: http://credo.stanford.edu/reports/MULTIPLE_CHOICE_CREDO.pdf, accessed 27.02.2018.

16. Nitoburg E.L. (2008) O nekotorykh aspektakh rasovoj problemy v SShA na rubezhe XX- XXI vekov [Some Aspects of the Race Problem in the U.S. on the Threshold of 20th and 21st Centuries]. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya, no 1, pp 69–86.

17. Parker J. (2009) No Child Left Behind: The Politics and Policy of Education Reform. Assessing the George W. Bush Presidency: A Tale of Two Terms (eds. Wroe A., Herbert J.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 182–198. PISA 2015: Results in Focus (2015). OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in- focus.pdf,accessed 27.02.2018.

18. Rhodes J. (2012) An Education in Politics: The Origins and Evolution of No Child Left Behind. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. S.1141 – America 2000 Excellence in Education Act (1991). U.S. Congress. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/senate-bill/1141, accessed 27.02.2018.

19. S.1177 – Every Student Succeeds Act (2015). U.S. Congress. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177, accessed 27.02.2018.

20. Sims P., Rossmeier V. (2015) The State of Public Education in New Orleans: 10 Years After Hurricane Katrina. Tulane University Available at: http://www.speno2015.com/read-online.html, accessed 27.02.2018.

21. Skachkova I.I. (2011) Sotsiolingvistichekie aspekty sporov o dvuyazychnom obrazovanii v SShA [Socio-Linguistic Aspects of the Debates on Bilingual Education in the U.S.]. V mire nauchnykh otkrytij, vol. 14, no 2, pp. 84–91.

22. Sullivan M. (1) (2015) Donald Trump on Education: 5 Things the Presidential Candidate Wants You to Know. Forbes, June 16, 2015. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maureensullivan/2015/06/16/donald-trump-on-education-5- things-the-presidential-candidatewants-you-to-know/#2dd5364b7d44, accessed 27.02.2018.

23. Sullivan M. (2) (2015) Hillary Clinton on Education: 8 Things the Presidential Candidate Wants You to Know. Forbes, April 12, 2015. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/maureensullivan/2015/04/12/hillary-clinton-oneducation-8-things-the-presidential-candidate-wants-you-to-know/, accessed 27.02.2018.

24. Tarasov A.A. (2011) Nesostoyatel’nost’ (bankrotstvo) munitsipal’nykh obrazovanij: opyt SShA i predlozheniya dlya Rossii [Insolvency (Bankruptcy) of Local Governments: U.S. Experience and Recommendations for Russia]. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 47–59.

25. Tolmacheva A.A. (2006) Vspomogatel’nye informatsionnye tekhnologii v spetsial’nom obrazovanii v SShA [Subsidiary Information Technologies in Special Education in the U.S]. Innovatsii, no 7, pp. 68–70.

26. Trump Signs Bills Overturning Obama-Era Education Regulations (2017). Los Angeles Times, March 28, 2017. Available at: http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la- essential-education-updatessouthern-trump-signs-bills-overturningobama-era- 1490718119-htmlstory.html, accessed 27.02.2018.

27. Trump D. (2017) Joint Address to Congress. Whitehouse.gov, February 28, 2017. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks- presidenttrump-joint-address-congress/, accessed 27.02.2018.

28. Trump D. (2018) State of the Union Address. Whitehouse.gov, January 30, 2018. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidentdonald-j- trumps-state-union-address/, accessed 27.02.2018.


Review

For citations:


LANKO D.A. Das Kind Mit Dem Bade Ausschütten? U.S. Federal School Reform in Early 21ST Century. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2018;11(2):63-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-2-63-81

Views: 938


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)