Military and Political Aspects of Balance of Power in East Asia: Japan, Republic of Korea and ASEAN Capacity
https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2022.01.02
Abstract
Rising U.S.-Chinese tensions affect all East Asian nations in almost every sphere. This kind of a tangible influence originates in decrease of predictability of the major actors behavior and their respective efforts in enhancing military security. As a matter of fact, regional environment is suffering from mutual distrust and cyclic assertive reaction of the players. J. Biden’s statement that “America is back at the table” affirms Washington’s intentions to develop its ally and partner ties with the East Asian nations. The most obvious reasons are opposing China’s rise and suppressing DPRK. However, not all regional states are ready to make such a strategic choice and support the United States completely, demonstrating binding commitments. Some nations accent on obtaining efficiency in defense, while others prefer to maintain an equal distance from either Washington or Beijing, and maintain a reliable dialogue with both of them. Mostly East Asian nations refrain from spoiling relationship with now-mighty China but it seems more and more complicated to justify rocketing of their respective defense budgets and strive for gaining an extra military capacity. This factor seriously destabilizes regional security complex of the East Asia, where Russia is also a potent actor so far.
Keywords
East Asia,
regional security,
arms race,
U.S.-Chinese confrontation,
Japan,
the Republic of Korea,
ASEAN
Supporting agencies: This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project № 20-511-93005 “The development of strategic partnership of Russia and China in East Asia”.
About the Author
A. V. Gubin
Oriental Studies Institute, Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Gubin, Ph.D., Associate professor
Ajax campus, Russkiy island, Vladivostok, 690922
References
1. Vietnam National Defense. Socialistic Republic of Viet Nam Ministry of National Defense (2019). National Political Publishing House. Available at: https://daisukybiendong.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/vietnams-defense-whitepaper-2019.pdf, accessed 23.08.2021.
2. Buzan B. (2003). Regional Security Complex Theory in the Post-Cold War World. In Soderbaum F, Shaw T.M. (eds.) Theories of New Regionalism. International Political Economy Series, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Chan I. (2019). Reversing China’s Beltand-Road Initiative—Singapore’s Response to the BRI and Its Quest for Relevance. East Asia, vol. 36, issue 3, pp. 185–204.
4. Heginbotham E., Samuels R. (2018). Active Denial: Redesigning Japan’s Response to China’s Military Challenge. International Security, vol. 42, no. 4, May, pp. 128–169.
5. Koga K. (2018). The Concept of “Hedging” Revisited: The Case of Japan's Foreign Policy Strategy in East Asia's Power Shift. International Studies Review, vol. 20, issue 4, December, pp. 633–660.
6. Medium term Defense Program FY 2019–FY 2023 (2018). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Available at: https://www.mod.go.jp/j/approach/agenda/guideline/2019/pdf/chuki_seibi31-35_e.pdf, accessed 23.08.2021.
7. National Defense Program Guidelines for FY 2019 and beyond (2018). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Available at: http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/pdf/2019boueikeikaku_e.pdf, accessed 23.08.2021.
8. North Korea is changing but still dangerous : Special report (2020). The Economist, April 8. Available at: https://www.economist.com/special-report/2020/04/08/north-korea-is-changing-but-stilldangerous, accessed 23.08.2021.
9. Panda A. (2019). The US and Japan after the INF Treaty. The Diplomat Magazine, December, issue 61. Available at: https://magazine.thediplomat.com/#/issues/-LulURInylDibWqHgwOj/preview/-LulU_Rok8Qn3GD-lLpJ, accessed 23.08.2021.
10. Takahashi S. (2005). Dealing with the ballistic missile threat: whether Japan should have strike capability under its exclusively defense-oriented policy. NIDS Security Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, October, pp. 105-121. Available at: https://japan.kantei.go.jp/98_abe/statement/201711/_00006.html, accessed 23.08.2021.
11. The Trump administration and Japan: challenges and vision for Japan’s foreign and security policy in the new era (2017). Nakasone Peace Institute. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2017.13 21894, accessed 23.08.2021.
12. U.S. Strategic Framework for the IndoPacific (2021) NSC Declassification review. 01.05. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2021/01/IPS-FinalDeclass.pdf, accessed 23.08.2021.
13. Vuving A. (2018) Vietnam’s national security architecture. Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. Available at: https://apcss.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NSA-VN-chapter-vuving-final.pdf, accessed 23.08.2021.
14. Yoshida F. (2018). From the Reality of a Nuclear Umbrella to a World without Nuclear Weapons : An Interview with Katsuya Okada. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 474–485.
Review
For citations:
Gubin A.V. Military and Political Aspects of Balance of Power in East Asia: Japan, Republic of Korea and ASEAN Capacity. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2022;15(1):29-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2022.01.02
Views:
707
Email this article 