Country Studies: A Team with No Coach? Problems of Composition, Methodology and Development
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-6-2
Abstract
The article raises and discusses six “provocative” questions about country studies in order to review, once more, its headings, facilities and, above all, its problems. The questions are as follows: (1) A discipline lacking its exact name, object and composition? (2) A science or...? (implicitly, not just science); (3) A theory-free science? (4) Сountry or state? (the question of the key object); (5) Degeneration or regeneration? (the nature of the evolution); and (6) Who and why needs it? (the fields of application). The answers are ambiguous and open to criticism. A finding from the reviewed problems of country studies is that they are numerous and serious. This is a truly interdisciplinary squad composed “from geology to ideology”, lacking a head coach, owner or even an internationally proprietary name, with a goal depending on the type (genre) of activity: research, informational, promotional or educational. Country studies as a science lacks clear understanding of its object, as well as its own theory (simplified reductions excluded), and self-confidence resulting in frequent tacks and relabeling. At the same time, its role is still great not as an “idiographer” and collector of any country information, but as a laboratory for searching and checking new development trends. The demand for a country scholar in the shape of a social order, not always explicit, is diverse and relatively stable. Hence the diagnosis: the patient is more alive than dead, and unlikely to die in the near future.
About the Author
A. I. Treivish
Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrei I. Treivish – DSc in Geography, Chief Researcher
19017, Staromonetny Lane, 29, Moscow
References
1. Alaev E.B. (1983). Socio-Economic Geography: Conceptual-Terminologic Dictionary, Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
2. Baranskiy N.N. (1946). Country Studies and Geography, Physical and Economic. Izvestiya VGO (Vsesoyuznogo Geograficheskogo Obshchestva), vol. 78, no 1, pp. 9–24 (in Russian).
3. Biechele M., Padrós A. (2013). Didaktik der Landeskunde: Fernstudienangebot DaF (Fernstudieneinheit 31), Stuttgart: Klett Sprachen.
4. Geographical Position and Territorial Structures: In Memory of I.M. Maergoiz (2012), Moscow: Novyy Khronograf (in Russian).
5. Gorkin A.P. (ed.) (2013). Socio-Economic Geography: Concepts and Terms, Smolensk: Oikumena (in Russian).
6. Hart J.F. (1983). The Highest Form of the Geographer’s Art. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 72, no 1, pp. 1–29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01380.x
7. Hill F., Gaddy C. (2003). The Siberian Curse: How Communist Planners Left Russia out in the Cold, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
8. Isard W. (2003). History of Regional Science and the Regional Science Association International, Berlin: Springer.
9. Karaulov Yu.N. (2018). Russian Language and Language Identity, Moscow: Lenand (in Russian).
10. Kozyreva A.M. (2012). Country Studies, Yaroslavl’: YarGU (in Russian).
11. Lipset S.M. (1993). Pacific Divide: American Exceptionalism – Japanese Uniqueness. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 121–166. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/5.2.121
12. Milanović B. (2016). Global Inequality: From Class to Location, From Proletarians to Migrants. Economic Policy, vol. 11, no 1, pp. 14–26. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/globalnoe-neravenstvo-ot-klassovoy-prinadlezhnosti-k-strane-prozhivaniya-ot-proletariev-k-migrantam, accessed 15.10.2021 (in Russian).
13. Mironenko N.S.(2001). CountryStudies: Theory and Methods, Moscow: Aspekt-Press (in Russian).
14. Naumov A.S. (ed.) (2019). Typology of Foreign Countries, Moscow: Pelikan (in Russian).
15. Ohmae K. (1996). The End of the Nation State. The Rise of Regional Economies, London: Harper Collins Publishers.
16. Parshev A.P. (1999). Why Russia Is not America, Moscow: Krymskiy most-9D (in Russian).
17. Regional Geography (2021). Science-Direct. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/regional-geography, accessed 15.10.2021.
18. Sapozhnikova E.N. (2004). Country Studies: Th eory and Methodology of Tourist Country Research, Moscow: Academiya (in Russian).
19. Sdasyuk G.V. (2021). New India. Development Geography: Achievements, Problems, Perspectives, Moscow: Kanon + ROOI «Reabilitatsiya» (in Russian).
20. Shuper V.A. (2004). In Memory of Valeriy Alekseevish Pulyarkin. Scientific Reality and Geographical Reality: Fourth Socratic Readings in Geography, Мoscow: Eslan, pp. 4–10 (in Russian).
21. State (2021). Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. A vailable at: https://www.oxfordlearn-ersdictionaries.com/definition/english/state_1?q=state, accessed 15.10.2021.
22. Vereshchagin E.M., Kostomarov V.G. (2014). Language and Culture. Three Linguistic-Cultural Concepts: Lexical Background, Speech-Behavioral Tactics and Sapientem, Moscow; Berlin: Direkt-Media (in Russian).
23. Vol’skiy V.V. (ed.) (2003). Socio-Economic Geography of the Foreign Word, Moscow: Drofa (in Russian).
24. Voskresenskiy A.D. (ed.) (2014). Global Integrated Regional Studies, Moscow: INFRA-M (in Russian).
25. Wallerstein I. (1991). Does India Exist? Wallerstein I. Unthinking Social Science, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 130–134.
26. Wright J.D. (ed.) (2015). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.
Review
For citations:
Treivish A.I. Country Studies: A Team with No Coach? Problems of Composition, Methodology and Development. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021;14(6):26-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-6-2
Views:
551
Email this article 