Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Transformation of the “Soviet Ideology” in the Discursive Practices of the Russian Government

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-4

Abstract

The article examines the trajectory of changes in the post-Soviet period in the ideological complex, which was called “Soviet ideology” in the “late” USSR. The theoretical and methodological frame work of the analysis consists of the theory of political regimes, as well as elements of the theory of ideologies and the theory of political discourse. The features and peculiarities of the “Soviet ideology” in the conditions of the “post-totalitarian” political regime in the “late” USSR, which led to its weakening and decline after the collapse of the Soviet regime, are investigated. Under the conditions of the post-Soviet political regime in Russia, the “Soviet ideology” disintegrated into an ideological component (the basis of the ideology of post-Soviet communist parties) and a political-cultural component (the pattern of post-Soviet political culture). Both components created a specific problem of relations with these phenomena for the ruling power. The study of the discourse of power on the subject of “Soviet ideology” (conducted mainly on the material of speeches and statements of the presidents of the Russian Federation) allowed us to identify three successive discursive strategies of such relations: the strategy of “struggle”, the strategy of “adaptation” and the strategy of “selective use”. The last of them was used in the 2010s in the conditions of consolidation of the authoritarian political regime. It made it possible to selective lyinclude the legacy of “Soviet ideology” in the ideological complex of the ruling regime, which is characterized by the use of not full-fledged political ideologies, but “identitarian narratives” that allow the inclusion of heterogeneous elements of ethno cultural, historical, religious, etc. traditions. Comparative studies also show that the orientation in the ideological sphere to such “identitarian narratives” is a characteristic trend of modern neo-autocracies.

About the Author

V. S. Avdonin
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INION RAN)
Russian Federation

Vladimir S. Avdonin - DSc in Politics, Leading Researcher

117418, Nakhimovsky Av., 51/21, Moscow



References

1. Abalov A., Inozemtsev V. (2020). The Infinite Empire: Russia in Search of Itself, Moscow: Alpina Publisher (in Russian).

2. Arnason J. (2011). Communism and Modernity. Sociological Journal, no 1, pp. 10–35. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17874380_82080972.pdf, accessed 15.09.2021 (in Russian).

3. David-Fox M. (2015). Crossing Borders: Modernity, Ideology, and Culture in Russia and the Soviet Union, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

4. Eltchaninoff M. (2018). Inside the Mind of Vladimir Putin, London: Oxford University Press.

5. Fairclough I., Fairclough N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students, London: Routledge.

6. Freeden M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford University Press.

7. Freeden M. (2013). The Morphological Analysis of Ideology. The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (eds. Freeden M., Stears M.), Oxford University Press, рр. 115–137.

8. Gel’man V. (2015). Authoritarian Russia, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

9. Gerring J. (1997). Ideology: A Definitional Analysis. Political Research Quarterly, no 4, рр. 957–994. DOI: 10.1177/106591299705000412

10. Gill G. (2000). The Dynamics of Democratization. Elites, Civil Society and the Transition Process, New York.

11. Gill G. (2011). Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12. Golos G.V. (2018). Comparative Political Science, Saint Petersburg: European University.

13. Hart C. (2015). Discourse. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (eds. Dabrowska E., Divjak D.), Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, рр. 322–345.

14. Hill F., Gaddy C.G. (2015). Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

15. Ionova A.O. (2016). Contemporary Approaches to the Analysis of Political Discourse. Political Science, no 3, pp. 236– 259. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_27429215_17534921.pdf,accessed 15.09.2021 (in Russian).

16. Kailitz S. (2013). Classifying Political Regimes Revisited: Legitimation and Durability. Democratization, vol. 20, no 1, рр. 39–60. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738861

17. Kara-Murza S.G. (2019). Soviet Civilization, Moscow: Rodina (in Russian).

18. Kneuer M. (2017). Legitimation beyond Ideology. Authoritarian Regimes and the Construction of Missions. Sonderheft Legitimation in Autokratien, Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, vol. 11, no 2, рр. 181–211. DOI: 10.1007/s12286-017-0335-z

19. Linz J.J. (1975). Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Handbook of Political Science, vol. 3: “Macropolitical Theory” (eds. Greenstein F.I., Polsby N.W.), Boston: Addison Wesley, рр. 175–411.

20. Linz J., Stepan A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post- Communist Europe, Baltimore.

21. Malinova O.Yu. (2010). Symbolic Politics and the Constructing of Macropolitical Identity in post-Soviet Russia. Polis. Political Studies, no 2, pp. 90–105 Available at: https://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2010/2/8.pdf, accessed 15.09.2021(in Russian).

22. Malinova O.Yu. (2014). Waiting for a Unifying Narrative: The Symbolic Dimension of Russia’s post-Soviet Transformation. Symbolic Politics. Issue 2, Moscow: INION, pp. 344–353. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/v-ozhidanii-obedinyayuschego-narrativa-simvolicheskoe-izmerenie-postsovetskoy-transformatsii-rossii-rets-na-kn-gill-g-symbolism-and/viewer, accessed 15.09.2021 (in Russian).

23. Malinova O.Yu. (2015). The Actual Past: The Symbolic Politics of the Ruling Elite and the Dilemmas of Russian Identity, Moscow: Political Encyclopedia (in Russian).

24. Malinova O.Yu. (2018). Justifying the Political Course of the 2000s and Constructing the Myth about “the Hard Nineties” in the Vladimir Putin’s Discourse. Political Science, no 3, pp. 45–69. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obosnovanie-politiki-2000-h-godov-v-diskursev-v-putina-i-formirovanie-mifa-o-lihihdevyanostyh/viewer, accessed 15.09.2021 (in Russian).

25. Martianov V.S., Fishman L.G. (eds.) (2016). Russia in Search of Ideologies: Transformation of Value Regulators of Modern Societies, Moscow: Political Encyclopedia (in Russian).

26. Medvedev R.A. (2003). The Soviet Union: The Last Year of Life, Moscow: Human Rights (in Russian).

27. Melville A.Yu. (2007). Democratic Transits. Political Science: Lexicon (ed. Solov’ev A.I.), Moscow: ROSSPAN, pp. 123– 134 (in Russian).

28. O’Donnell G., Schmitter P.C. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Johns Hopkins University Press.

29. Popova O.V. (2020). Unresolved Problems in the Theory of State Identity Policy in Russian Political Science. Political Science, no 4, pp. 86–110 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31249/poln/2020.04.05

30. Shablinsky I.G. (2017). The “New Russian Conservatism” and the Soviet Ideological Paradigm. Political Science, no 3, pp. 136–157. Available at: http://inion.ru/ru/publishing/zhurnaly-iz-perechniavak/politicheskaia-nauka/arkhiv/2017-3/novyi-rossiiskii-konservatizm-i-sovetskaia-ideologicheskaia-paradigma/, accessed 15.09.2021 (in Russian).

31. Sherlock Т. (2016). Russian Politics and the Soviet Past: Reassessing Stalin and Stalinism under Vladimir Putin. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 49, no 1, рр. 45–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.01.001

32. Thompson J.B. (1984). Studies in the Theory of Ideology, Berkeley: University of California Press.

33. Wodak R., Meyer M. (eds.) (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, London, New York: Sage.

34. Yurchak A.V. (2020). It Was Forever, Until It Was Over. The Last Soviet Generation, Moscow: New Literary Review (in Russian).

35. Zimmermann B. (2014). Ruling Russia. Authoritarianism from the Revolution to Putin, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

36. Zinoviev A.A. (2001). The Death of Russian Communism, Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Avdonin V.S. Transformation of the “Soviet Ideology” in the Discursive Practices of the Russian Government. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021;14(5):81-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-4

Views: 783


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)