Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-1-6
Abstract
Greenland, the biggest island in the world inhabited predominantly by Inuits, was a Danish colony before 1953 and has since then been a part of the Danish realm with a gradually increasing autonomy. Some 2/3 of its population favor a complete secession, but the heavy dependence upon Danish budget subsidies is the main challenge.
The Chinese government and companies have since 2005 maintained a close dialogue with Greenland as an entry point to the Arctic and a rich base of natural resources (including rare earth elements), though there has not been major investments yet. The U.S. have lately tried to halt this cooperation for the reasons of foreign, security and resource policy, and to put Greenland under a tighter American control. President Trump’s purchase offer in 2019 was the most publicized initiative. Denmark, despite its close alliance with the United States, is worried by either American or Chinese involvement and tries to become a good patron for Greenland to prevent its secession. Meanwhile, the Greenlandic authorities confirm their political will to struggle for a complete independence from Denmark.
The article suggests three medium-term scenarios, with Greenland remaining in an gradually looser union with Denmark, moving into the U.S. domain and acquiring a full statehood with a subsequent competition of great powers. Whatever the outcome, Russia shall monitor the development closely and play an active role in the Arctic, not taking a part in the US-China rivalry.
Keywords
Greenland,
self-rule,
secessionism,
Denmark,
China-US confrontation,
Arctic,
rare earth elements,
scenarios,
Russia
About the Author
A. A. Krivorotov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Odintsovo branch
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Krivorotov - PhD in Economics, Assistant Professor, Innovation Management Department
143007, Novo-Sportivnaya St., 3, Odintsovo, Moscow District
References
1. Ahlness E.A. (2020) Nunatta Qitornai: A Party Analysis of the Rhetoric and Future of Greenlandic Separatism. Preprint. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17174.50245
2. Andersson P., Willaing Zeuthen J., Kalvig Per. (2018) Chinese Mining in Greenland: Arctic Access or Access to Minerals? Arctic Yearbook-2018 (eds. Heininen L., Exner-Pirot H.). Available at: https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2018/China-and-the-Arctic/7_AY2018_Andersson.pdf, accessed 08.05.2020.
3. Berry D.A. (2016) The Monroe Doctrine and the Governance of Greenland’s Security. Governing the North American Arctic. Sovereignty, Security, and Institutions (eds. Berry D.A., Bowles N., Jones H.), London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 103–121.
4. Breum M. (1) (2020) Greenland’s Premier Doesn’t Foresee a US Takeover and Remains Committed to the Quest for Independence. Arctic Today, January 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.arctictoday.com/greenlands-premier-doesnt-foresee-a-us-takeover-and-remains-committed-to-the-quest-for-independence, accessed 06.05.2020.
5. Breum M. (2) (2020) How a US Pivot to the North Changes the European Arctic. Martin Breum, August 22, 2020. Available at: https://www.martinbreum.dk/how-aus-pivot-to-the-north-changes-the-european-arctic, accessed 18.09.2020.
6. Danish Defence Intelligence Service (2019). Intelligence Risk Assessment 2019, Copenhagen: DDIS.
7. Fuglede M., Kidmose J., Lanteigne M., Schaub G.Jr. (2014) Kina, Grønland, Danmark – konsekvenser og muligheder i kinesisk Arktispolitik, København: Center for militære studier.
8. Gulevich V. (2020) Denmark, USA and Greenland’s Independence. International Affairs, April 28, 2020. Available at: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/26171, accessed 14.09.2020 (in Russian).
9. Kleist Pedersen B. (2020) Greenlandic Images and the Post-colonial: Is It Such a Big Deal after All? The Postcolonial North Atlantic. Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands (eds. Körber L.-A., Volquardsen E.), Berlin: Nordeuropa-Institut der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, pp. 283–312.
10. Knudsen N. (2019) Greenland at Crossroads: Who Will Obtain the World’s Biggest Island? Ogonyok, no 9. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4110890, accessed 14.05.2020 (in Russian).
11. Krivorotov A.K. (2013) China’s Arctic Activization as Seen from Scandinavia. China in World and Regional Policy. Vol. XVIII (ed. Safronova E.I.), Moscow: IFES RAS, pp. 158–192 (in Russian).
12. Major M. (2019) The Relations Between Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands. A Model with Future to Challenge Secessionism? Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain (eds. López-Basaguren A., Escajedo San-Epifanio L.), Madrid: Springer, pp. 233–245.
13. Mingming Shi, Lanteigne M. (2019) China’s Central Role in Denmark’s Arctic Security Policies. The Diplomat, December 8, 2019. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2019/12/chinas-central-role-in-denmarks-arctic-security-policies, accessed 22.04.2020.
14. Mouritzen K. (2020) USAs interesse for Grønland skal vi hilse velkommen. Berlingske Tidende, 31. juli 2020. Available at: https://www.berlingske.dk/ledere/usas-interesse-for-groenland-skal-vi-hilse-velkommen, accessed 17.08.2020.
15. Øfjord Blaxekær L., Lanteigne M., Mingming Shi (2018) The Polar Silk Road & the West Nordic Region. Arctic Yearbook-2018 (eds. Heininen L., ExnerPirot H.). Available at: https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2018/Scholarly_Papers/25_AY2018_Blaxekjr-Lanteigne.pdf, accessed 08.05.2020.
16. The Geopolitics of Rare Earth Elements (2019). Stratfor, April 8, 2019. Available at: https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/geopolitics-rare-earth-elements, accessed 04.12.2019.
17. Vozgrin V.E. (1984) Greenland and Greenlanders, Moscow: Mysl’ (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Krivorotov A.A. Greenland and Denmark: Arctic Secessionism in a Global Powerplay. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021;14(1):118-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-1-6
Views:
1358
Email this article 