Uncontrolled Territories in the Contemporary World: Theory, Genesis, Types and Dynamics
Abstract
The uncontrolled territories (UT) attract the attention of an increasing number of researchers; however, most publications are devoted to only one type of UTs – unrecognized states. The objective of this paper is to assess and analyze changes in territory and population of all UTs in different macro-regions of the world through 2006–2010 and 2014–2019. Five main directions of studies of such territories are identified and characterized. The authors distinguish several types and patterns of territorial control, propose a typology of UTs and consider in detail the methodology and difficulties of creating a corresponding database. The aggravation of the geopolit ical situation in the second decade of the 21th century led to an increase in the number of international conflicts and in the area and population of UTs in Asia, Africa and Europe. The de facto secession largely affected the vast zones of problematic statehood in Asia and Africa, where according to the authors’ estimates, about 45 million and 138 million people live, respectively. The emergence of UTs is a special case of the fragmentation of the political space at different territorial levels – a consequence of the turbulent transformation of the world geopolitical order.
Keywords
non-controlled territories,
non-recognized states,
fragmentation of political space,
separatism,
secessionism
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out at the Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences as part of the work on the RSF project no 19-17- 00232 «Post-Soviet Non-Recognized States: Factors of Viability and Risks for Russia»
About the Authors
V. A. Kolosov
Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Kolosov - DSc in Geography, Center for Geopolitical Studies, Deputy Director
119017, Staromonetniy l., 29, Moscow
A. B. Sebentsov
Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander B. Sebentsov - PhD in Geography, Senior Researcher, Center for Geopolitical Studies
119017, Staromonetniy l., 29, Moscow
N. L. Turov
Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikita L. Turov - Junior Researcher, Center for Geopolitical Studies
119017, Staromonetniy l., 29, Moscow
References
1. Agnew J. (2009) Globalization and Sovereignty, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
2. Alov I. (2020) Spatial Concentration of African Americans in Large Metropolitan Areas of the United States. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, no 5, pp. 694–703 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2587556620050040
3. Appadurai A. (1996) Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Bakke K., Linke A., O’Loughlin J.,
4. Toal G. (2018) Dynamics of State-building after War: External-internal Relations in Eurasian De Facto States. Political Geography, vol. 63, pp. 159–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.011
5. Barlow E. (2020) Secession in the Posttruth, Post-order World: A View from Africa. Perspectives on Secession: Theory and Case Studies (eds. Riegl M., Doboš B.), Springer International Publishing, pp. 31–44.
6. Berg E. (2018) Bridging the Divide between Parent States and Secessionist Entities: A New Perspective for Conflict Management? Space and Polity, vol. 20, no 3, pp. 15–29. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2018.1457341
7. Berg E., Kuusk E. (2010) What Makes Sovereignty a Relative Concept? Empirical Approaches to International Society. Political Geography, vol. 29, no 1, pp. 40–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.01.005
8. Berg E., Vits K. (2018) Quest for Survival and Recognition: Insights into the Foreign Policy Endeavours of the Post-Soviet De Facto States. Ethnopolitics, vol. 17, no 4, pp. 390–407. DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2018.1495359
9. Blakkisrud H., Kolstø P. (2012) Dynamics of De Facto Statehood: The South Caucasian De Facto States between Secession and Sovereignty. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 12, no 2, pp. 281– 298. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2012.686013
10. Bolshakov A. (2007) Non-Recognized States in European Borderlands. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, no 3(15), pp. 83– 88. Available at: http://intertrends.ru/old/fifteen/008.htm, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
11. Brazhalovich F. (2018) The Geography of Drug Trafficking in Latin America. Latinskaya America, no 8, pp. 32–47 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0000444-7
12. Brazhalovich F., Klyuchnikov M., Lukyanov A. (2016) The Political-geographical Aspects of Problematic Statehood (Exemplified by Somalia). Geography and Natural Resources, vol. 37, no 3, pp. 264–270. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372816030100
13. Carboni A., Moody J. (2018) Between the Cracks: Actor Fragmentation and Local Conflict Systems in the Libyan Civil War. Small Wars & Insurgencies, vol. 29, no 3, pp. 456–490. DOI: 10.1080/09592318.2018.1455318
14. Caspersen N. (2012) Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System, MA: Polity.
15. Dembinska M. (2018) Carving out the Nation with the Enemy’s Kin: Double Strategy of Boundary-making in Transnistria and Abkhazia. Nations and Nationalism, vol. 25, no 1, pp. 298–317. DOI: 10.1111/nana.12386
16. Dembinska M., Campana A. (2017) Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De Facto States: Perspectives and Directions for Research. International Studies Review, vol. 19, no 2, pp. 254–278. DOI: 10.1093/isr/vix010
17. Dobronravin N. (2011) Unrecognized States in the “Gray Zone” of World Politics: The Basics of Survival and Sovereignty Rules, Saint Petersburg: Publishing of the European University in Saint Petersburg (in Russian).
18. Ekeke A., Lubisi N. (2019) Secession in Africa: An African Union Dilemma. African Security Review, vol. 28, no 3–4, pp. 245–260. DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2020.1717974
19. Elden S. (2007) Rethinking Governmentality. Political Geography, vol. 26, no 1, pp. 29–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.001
20. Fernandez-Molina I., Ojeda-Garcia R. (2020) Western Sahara as a Hybrid of a Parastate and a State-in-Exile: (Extra)territoriality and the Small Print of Sovereignty in a Context of Frozen Conflict. Nationalities Papers, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 83–99. DOI: 10.1017/nps.2019.34
21. Florea A. (2014) De Facto States in International Politics (1945–2011): A New Data Set. International Interactions, vol. 40, no 5, pp. 788–811. DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2014.915543
22. Foucher M. (1991) Fronts et frontières: un tour de monde géopolitique, Paris: Fayard.
23. Giddens A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
24. Glassner M., De Blij H. (1989) Systematic Political Geography, 4th ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons.
25. Golubchik M. (1998) Political Geography of the World, Smolensk: Izd. Smol. gum. u-ta (in Russian).
26. Hettne B., Söderbaum F. (1998) The New Regionalism Approach. Politeia, vol. 17, no 3, pp. 6–21. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?-abstract_id=2399180, accessed 25.09.2020.
27. Hoch T. (2018) Legitimization of Statehood and its Impact on Foreign Policy in De Facto States: A Case Study of Abkhazia. Iran and the Caucasus, vol.22, no 4, pp.382–402. DOI: 10.1163/1573384X-20180406
28. Holmes J. (2015) Sendero Luminoso after Fujimori: A Sub-national Analysis. The Latin Americanist, vol. 59, no 2, pp. 29–50. DOI: 10.1111/tla.12053
29. Ilyin M.(2008) Can There Be a Universal Typology of States? Political Science, no 4, pp. 8–41. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_11838485_68205239.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
30. Ilyin M. (2011) Alternative Forms of Modern Statehood. Comparative Politics Russia, no 2, pp. 11–19 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-3(5)-11-19
31. Ilyin M., Meleshkina Ye., Melvil A. (2010) Formation of New States: External and Internal Factors of Consolidation. Polis, no 3, pp. 26–39. Available at: https://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2010/3/3.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
32. Inozemtsev V. (2008) Modern Globalization and Its Perception in the World. Age of Globalization, no 1, pp. 31–44. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_15142807_68673531.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
33. Jackson R.H. (2007) Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence and the Third World. International Law and International Relations (eds. Simmons B., Steinberg R.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–232.
34. Joffe G. (2020) Libya: The New Geopolitical Arena. The Journal of North African Studies, vol. 25, no 5, pp. 681–688. DOI: 10.1080/13629387.2020.1790110
35. Jones M., Jones R. (2004) Nation States, Ideological Power and Globalisation: Can Geographers Catch the Boat? Geoforum, vol. 35, no 4, pp. 409–424. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.12.002
36. Justin P.H., De Vries L. (2019) Governing Unclear Lines: Local Boundaries as a (Re)source of Conflict in South Sudan. Journal of Borderlands Studies,vol.34, no 1, pp.31– 46. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1294497
37. Kalyvas S. (2006) The Logic of Violence in Civil War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Knight D.B. (1982) Identity and Territory: Geographical Perspectives on Nationalism and Regionalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 72, no 4, pp. 514–531. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01842.x
39. Kolosov V., Mironenko N. (2001) Geopolitics and Political Geography, Moscow: Aspekt Press (in Russian).
40. Kolosov V., O’Loughlin J. (1999) Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a New Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (TMR). Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity (ed. Newman D.), London: Franc Cass, pp. 151–176.
41. Kolstø P. (2006) The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 43, no 6, pp. 723–740. DOI: 10.1177/0022343306068102
42. Krasner S.D. (2009) Power, the State, and Sovereignty: Essays on International Relations, London: Routledge.
43. Krugman P., Venables A. (1995) Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, no 4, pp. 857–880. DOI: 10.2307/2946642
44. Lamb R.D. (2008) Ungoverned Areas and Threats from Safe Havens. Available at: https://cissm.umd.edu/sites/default/files/2019-07/ugash_report_final.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.
45. Lawler A. (2015) Making Contact. Science, vol. 348, no 6239, pp. 1072–1079. DOI: 10.1126/science.348.6239.1072
46. MacDonald S. (1993) The New “Bad Guys”: Exploring the Parameters of the Violent New World Order. Gray Area Phenomena: Confronting the New World Disorder (ed. Manwaring M.), Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 33–60.
47. Markedonov S. (2012) De Facto States in the Post-Soviet Space, Yerevan: Institute of the Caucasus (in Russian).
48. McColl R.W. (1969) The Insurgent State: Territorial Bases of Revolution. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, vol. 59, no 4, pp. 613–631. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1969.tb01803.x
49. McGarry J. (2004) Foreword: De Facto States and the International Order. De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty (eds. Bahcheli T., Bartmann B., Srebrnik H.), London: Routledge, pp. ix–xii.
50. Menkhaus K. (2007) Constraints and Opportunities in Ungoverned Spaces: The Horn of Africa. Denial of Sanctuary: Understanding Terrorist Safe Havens (ed. Innes M.), CT: Praeger Security International, pp. 67–82.
51. Mironenko N., Denisencev A. (2004) About Political Geoconflictology as a Field of Geographical Knowledge. Problems of Geoconflictology (ed. Mironenko N.), Moscow: Press-Solo, vol. 1, pp. 12–24 (in Russian).
52. Murphy A. (2002) National Claims to Territory in the Modern State System: Geographical Considerations. Geopolitics, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 193–214. DOI: 10.1080/714000938
53. Murphy A. (2010) Intersecting Geographies of Institutions and Sovereignty. The International Studies Encyclopedia. Vol. 7 (ed. Denemark R.), Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 4628–4645.
54. Neklessa A.I. (1997) Postmodern World in a New Coordinate System. Vostok, no 2, pp. 35–50 (in Russian).
55. Norman S. (2018) Narcotization as Security Dilemma: The FARC and Drug Trade in Colombia. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, vol. 41, no 8, pp. 638–659. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1338052
56. O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V. (2017) Building Identities in post-Soviet “De Facto States”: Cultural and Political Icons in Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia, Transdniestria, and Abkhazia.Eurasian Geography and Economic, vol. 58, no 17, pp. 691–715. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2018.1468793
57. O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V., Toal G. (2014) Inside the post-Soviet De Facto States: A Comparison of Attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 55, no 5, pp. 423–456. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1012644
58. Ong A. (2000) Graduated Sovereignty in South-East Asia. Theory, Culture, and Society, vol. 17, no 4, pp. 55–75. DOI: 10.1177/02632760022051310
59. Pegg S. (1998) De Facto States in the International System. Institute of International Relations. The University of British Columbia. Working Paper. No 21. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.695.2796&rep=rep1&type=pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.
60. Political Atlas of the Modern World: An Experiment in Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of the Political Systems of Modern States (2009), Moscow: Preprint. MGIMO-University Press (in Russian).
61. Popov F.А. (2011) From Stateless Territory to “De Facto State”. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, vol. 9, no 2(26), pp. 16–28. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17006286_75413644.pdf, accessed 16.12.2020 (in Russian).
62. Popov F.A. (2012) Geography of Separatism in the Contemporary World, Moscow: Novyj Chronograf (in Russian).
63. Popov F.A. (2014) Spatial Aspects of the Degradation and Collapse of a Sovereign State. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, no 7, pp. 78–86. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21787369_93818490.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
64. Rabasa A. et al. (2007) Ungoverned Territories: Understanding and Reducing Terrorism Risks, CA: RAND Corporation.
65. Raufer X. (2000) New World Disorder, New Terrorisms: New Threats for Europe and the Western World. The Future of Terrorism (eds. Taylor M., Horgan J.), London: Frank Cass Publishers, pp. 30–51.
66. Rosenau J. (2002) The Governance of Fragmegration: Neither a World Republic nor a Global Interstate System. Available at: http://aura.u-pec.fr/regimen/_fich/_pdf/pub_002.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020.
67. Rotberg R. (1) (2003) Failed States, Collapsed States, Weak States: Causes and Indicators. State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror (ed. Rotberg R.), Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1–25.
68. Rotberg R. (2) (2003) When State Fail, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
69. Schmitt-Egner P. (2002) The Concept of ‘Region’: Theoretical and Methodological Notes on its Reconstruction. European Integration, vol. 24, no 3, pp. 25–34. DOI: 10.1080/07036330270152196
70. Sebentsov A., Kolosov V. (2012) The Phenomenon of Uncontrolled Territories in the Modern World. Polis, no 2, pp. 31–46. Available at: https://www.politstudies.ru/files/File/2012/2/3.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
71. Sergunin A. (2010) Sovereignty: Evolution of Concept. Political Expertise: POLITEX, no 4, pp. 5–21. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_16352861_69316232.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
72. Sidaway J. (2003) Sovereign Excesses? Portraying Postcolonial Sovereigntyscapes. Political Geography, vol. 22, no 2, pp. 157– 178.DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00082-3
73. Silayeva Z., Bolshakov A. (2012) Phenomenon “Contested States” in Modern World Politics: An Influence of Actors or Tool of Global Games. Political Expertise: POLITEX, no 3, pp. 221–242. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20800345_54854104.pdf, accessed 25.09.2020 (in Russian).
74. South A. (2018) “Hybrid Governance” and the Politics of Legitimacy in the Myanmar Peace Process. Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 50–66. DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2017.1387280
75. Staniland A. (2012) States, Insurgents, and Wartime Political Orders. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 243–264. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592712000655
76. Tao R., Srtandow D., Findley M., Thill J.-C., Walsh J. (2016) A Hybrid Approach to Modeling Territorial Control in Violent Armed Conflicts. Transactions in GIS, vol. 20, no 3, pp. 413–425. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12228
77. Taylor P., Flint C. (2018) Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality, London: Routledge.
78. Turovskij R. (1999) Political Geography, Smolensk: Izdatel’stvo SGU (in Russian).
79. Wallensteen P. (2002) Understanding Conflict Resolution: War, Peace and the Global System, London: Sage.
80. Whelan T. (2006) Africa’s Ungoverned Space. Nacao & Defesa, vol. 114, no 3, pp. 61–73.
81. Zayats D. (2020) The Phenomenon of Unrecognized States in the Modern World. Geographical Environment and Living Systems, no 1, pp. 53–69 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18384/2712-7621-2020-1-53-69
Review
For citations:
Kolosov V.A., Sebentsov A.B., Turov N.L. Uncontrolled Territories in the Contemporary World: Theory, Genesis, Types and Dynamics. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2021;14(1):23-51. (In Russ.)
Views:
1694
Email this article 