The Phenomenon of “New Populism”: the American Dimension
Abstract
The article examines the evolution of ideological and political attitudes, the essential characteristics and instrumental functions of modern populism using the case of the United States of America. It is well known that populism differs from other political movements in its direct appeal to voters / people as an undifferentiated social mass, and thus constitutes an effective means of mobilizing the masses of the population in a protracted crisis of the political system and its institutions. The instrumental effectiveness of populism is often used to regroup social forces necessary for society and to give the entire political system greater elasticity, to increase its responsiveness to the interests of the “street man,” that is, ordinary voter. The ruling groups, especially in the USA, have learned to use populism effectively as a force capable of reducing the intensity of social conflicts, as well as for the integration of the “dissatisfied” into the existing institutions of the state that they themselves need. The first, and very successful, example of this kind was the “new deal” of F.D. Roosevelt, the political result of which was the creation in America of a “middle class society” that was not susceptible to extremes of both the right and the left. At present, the overlapping civilizational “rift” and the political crisis have forced the influential forces of American society to turn again to populism as a proven means of modifying America’s development model and pacifying a significant part of the population of this country. The 2016 presidential election convincingly demonstrated the powerful instrumental capacities of populism, manifested, in particular, in a certain renewal of the US socio-economic policy.
Similar processes of regrouping of socio-political forces are to be observed in other “institutionalized democracies” of the West, which allows us to consider the “new” / “national” populism as a relatively stable and long-term phenomenon of socio-political development of the western world.
Similar processes of regrouping of socio-political forces are to be observed in other “institutionalized democracies” of the West, which allows us to consider the “new” / “national” populism as a relatively stable and long-term phenomenon of socio-political development of the western world.
About the Author
A. G. Volodin
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DSc in History, Chief Researcher
117997, Profsoyuznaya St., 23, Moscow, Russian Federation
References
1. Buchanan P.J. (2011) Suicide of a Superpower. Will America Survive to 2025? New York: St.Martin’s Press.
2. Burnham W.D. (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics, New York: W.W. Norton.
3. Carpeentier de Courdon C. (2019) Crisis of Democracy and Secularism: Words in Search of Meaning. Sunday Guardian, December 14, 2019. Available at: https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/opinion/crisis-democracy-secularism-words-search-meaning, accessed 25.08.2020.
4. de Swaan A. (1988) In Care of the State. Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Di Tella T.S. (1997) Populism into the Twenty-first Century. Government and Opposition, vol. 32, no 2, pp. 187–200. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00157.x
6. Eatwell R., Goodwin M. (2018) National Populism. The Revolt against Liberal Democracy, London: Pelican.
7. Ekins E. (2017) The Five Types of Trump Voters. Voter Study Group, June, 2017. Available at: https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publication/the-fivetypes-trump-voters, accessed 25.08.2020.
8. Florida R. (2018) New Urban Crisis, Moscow: Tochka (in Russian).
9. Gamble A. (2019) Globalization and the New Populism. Policy Network, April 11, 2019. Available at: https://policynetwork.org/opinions/essays/globalization-and-the-new-populism/, accessed 25.08.2020.
10. Girdusky R. (2019) The Not-So-New Populism. The American Conservative, April 11, 2019. Available at:
11. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-not-so-new-populismfarage-le-pen-orban/, accessed 25.08.2020.
12. Hair W.I. (1991) The Kingfish and His Realm: The Life and Times of Huey P. Long, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
13. History of the USA. Vol. 2, 1887–1918 (1985), Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
14. History of the USA. Vol. 3, 1918–1945 (1985), Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
15. History of the USA. Vol. 4, 1945–1980 (1987), Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
16. Kazin M. (1995) The Populist Persuasion: An American History, New York: Basic Books.
17. Kenny P.D. (2017) Populism and Patronage. Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia and Beyond, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18. Lesher S. (1994) George Wallace: American Populist, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Lord B. (2019) The U-Turn That Made America Staggeringly Unequal. Counter-Punch, December 5, 2019. Available at: https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/12/05/the-u-turn-that-made-america--staggeringly-unequal/, accessed 25.08.2020.
20. MacMillan M. (2016) The New Year and the New Populism. The Strategist, December 21, 2016. Available at: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/newyear-new-populism/, accessed 25.08.2020.
21. Populism. World History Encyclopedia. Available at: https://w.histrf.ru/search?search=%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC&source_id=1, accessed 25.08.2020 (in Russian).
22. Reich R. (2016) Saving Capitalism, For the Many, Not the Few, London: Icon Books.
23. Taggart P. (2002) Populism, Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Thurow L. (1996) The Future of Capitalism. How Today’s Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow’s World, London: Nicolas Brealey Publishing.
Review
For citations:
Volodin A.G. The Phenomenon of “New Populism”: the American Dimension. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2020;13(4):253-277. (In Russ.)
Views:
855
Email this article 