Problems of Regionalization in Post-Soviet Central Asia
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-3-8
Abstract
Different interpretations of the concept of “Central Asia” (CA) as well as mutual definitions of its geographical borders indicate the incompleteness in the process of forming Central Asia as a region. Regionalization as an effective form of upholding and promoting by Central Asian countries their national interests is distinguished in Central Asia by a multilevel characterization. It includes the desire of the republics to promote their national interests as sovereign states, then to develop their trade, economic and political interaction within the framework of integration processes, and to join various integration initiatives and supranational projects with a wide range of non‑regional participants. Central Asian states’ attempts to develop intra‑regional cooperation in the period from 1994 to 2005 ended in failure. Since 2017, the idea of a “new integration” has been gaining popularity in Central Asia, and it is considered to be a part of the construction within the framework of the Union of Central Asian States which is planned for creation. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan claim for the role of “region‑forming” countries and two cores around which the development of hypothetical regional integration is possible. At the same time, the foreign policy of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, their approaches to security problems have a kind of differences, while their regional neighbors are also differ from each other in their approaches to some economic and social issues; the resource base of Central Asian states is incomparable either. Therefore, there are many factors that hinder a regionalization as well as an integration. Among them are the centripetal aspirations of the Central Asian countries/ They prefer, instead of neighbors in the region, external partners and markets, international financial institutions and donor structures. There are objective obstacles that impede regionalization, including the fact that the five republics of the region reluctant to share the sovereignty acquired after the collapse of the USSR in favor of supranational structures, whether they operate on the scale of the post‑Soviet space or they are planned to be created within the region.
About the Author
D. B. Malysheva
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dina B. Malysheva
DSc in Politics, Head of Sector Center of Post-Soviet Studies
117997, Profsoyuznaya St., 23, Moscow
References
1. Barnovsky V., Kvashnin Yu., Toganova N. (eds.) (2018) International Development Assistance as Foreign Policy Tool: Foreign Experience, Moscow: IMEMO (in Russian).
2. Barygin I.N. (ed.) (2007) Fundamentals of Regional Studies, Moscow: Aspect Press (in Russian).
3. Bogaturov A., Dundich A., Troitskiy E. (eds.) Central Asia: A “Delayed Neutrality” and International Relations in the 2000s. Essays on Current Politics, Moscow (in Russian).
4. Bohr A., Brauer B., Gould-Davies N., Kassenova N., Lillis J., Mallinson K., Nixey J., Satpayev D. (2019) Kazakhstan: Tested by Transition. Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/CHHJ8054-RUSSIANKazakhstan-Report-FINAL.pdf, accessed 22.06.2020 (in Russian).
5. Gafurov B.G. (1989) Tajiks, Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
6. Hettne B., Söderbaum F. (1998) The New Regionalism Approach. Politeia, vol. 17, no 3, pp. 6–21. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?-abstract_id=2399180, accessed 22.06.2020.
7. History of Civilizations of Central Asia (1992). Vol. 1, Paris: UNESCO. Available at: https://archive.org/details/HistoryOfCivilizationsOfCentralAsiaTheDawnOfCivilizationEarliest/page/n1/mode/2up, accessed 22.06.2020.
8. Humboldt A. (1843) Asie Centrale: Recherches sur les Chaines de Montagnes et la Climatologie Comparée, Paris: Gide.
9. Hurrel A. (1995) Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics. Review of International Studies, vol. 21, no 4, pp. 331–358. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210500117954
10. Ionova E. (2018) Development of Relations between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan as a Factor of Regionalization in Central Asia. Russia and New States of Eurasia, no 4(41), pp. 132–145 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/2073-4786-2018-4-132-145
11. Karimova A.B. (2006) Regional Space in the Modern Political Organization of the World, Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies (in Russian).
12. Keohane R.O., Nye J.S. (eds.) (1972) Transnational Relations and World Politics, Сambridge: Harvard University Press.
13. Khalfin N.A. (1965) Accession of Central Asia to Russia (60 – 90 years of the XIX century), Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
14. Khanikoff N. (1961) Mémoires sur le Partie Méridionale de l’Asie Centrale, Paris.
15. Khidoyatov G.A. (1967) Jeffrey Wheeler Rewrites Central Asian History. Voprosy istorii, no 12, pp. 21–35 (in Russian).
16. Kosolapov N.A. (2005) Globalization: Territorial and Spatial Dimension. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no 6, pp. 3–13 (in Russian).
17. Lagutina M.L. (2016) The World of Regions in the Global Political System of the 21st Century, Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. politekh. un-ta (in Russian).
18. Lavrishchev A.N. (1964) Economic Geography of the USSR, Moscow: Economics (in Russian).
19. Malysheva D. (2010) Central Asian Knot of World Politics, Moscow: IMEMO (in Russian).
20. Malysheva D. (2017) The Afghan Crisis and Post-Soviet Central Asia. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 61, no 8, pp. 14–23 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-8-14-23
21. Mamedov G., Shatalova O. (eds.) (2016) Concepts of the Soviet in Central Asia, Bishkek: Headquarters Press (in Russian).
22. Pechatnov V.O., Strel’tsov D.V. (eds.) (2019) Countries and Regions of the World in World Politics. Volume 2: Asia and Africa. Textbook for High Schools, Moscow: Aspekt Press (in Russian).
23. Shaimergenov T.T., Abisheva M.A. (eds.) (2017) Central Asia 2027: A Changing Strategic Landscape, Astana: The Library of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbassy (in Russian).
24. Spartak A.N. (2017) Metamorphosis of Regionalization: from Regional Trade Agreements to Megaregional Projects. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 10, no 4, pp. 13–37 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-4-13-37
25. Starr S.F. (2005) A ‘Greater Central Asia Partnership’ for Afghanistan and Its Neighbors, Washington: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program.
26. Voskresenski A.D. (ed.) (2011) East and Politics, Moscow: Aspekt Press (in Russian).
27. Voskresenski A.D. (2012) Concepts of Regionalization, Regional Subsystems, Regional Complexes and Regional Transformations in Contemporary IR. Comparative Politics Russia, vol. 3, no 2(8), pp. 30–58. Available at: https://www.comparativepolitics.org/jour/article/view/147, accessed 22.06.2020 (in Russian).
28. Zholdasbaev S. (2010) History of Kazakhstan, Almaty: Mektep (in Russian).
29. Ziyadullaev N., Ziyadullaev U. (2019) On the Development Strategy of Central Asian States in the Context of Globalization and Regionalization of the Global Economy. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, no 4, pp. 87–100 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760004759-3
Review
For citations:
Malysheva D.B. Problems of Regionalization in Post-Soviet Central Asia. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2020;13(3):140-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-3-8
Views:
2286
Email this article 