Global Cities as the Hubs of New Transnational Actors

In the context of the world development paradigm shift and the transition to a network structure, so-called new transnational actors are beginning to play an increasing role in global governance processes, their activity is constantly growing and their composition is expanding. In the economic sphere their core is made up of transnational corporations (TNC), in the political sphere  – of international organizations of different profiles and status. Placing their headquarters in cities, such structures, together with the institutions of traditional subjects of international relations, largely determine both the set of command and control functions over urban agglomerations, their competitiveness, sustainability of development and the variability of the configuration of the General framework of “centers of power” operating on the world stage. Their influence growth in the context of desovereignization process development means the approximation of the historical transition in the spatial organization of the international community from its traditional “countries-nations” model to the “archipelago of cities”, which is a set of centers of different rank and functional profile, closely interacting on a global scale.

The global cities concept, which emerged in the 1990s, is aimed at revealing this phenomenon. The explanatory part of this concept is based on the superposition of network structures of global firms highly specialized business services in global cities. The article discusses the main directions in modern research of global cities, argues for the need for a qualitative update of existing approaches, and the importance of new transnational actors in their formation. An assessment of the dynamics and localization of the headquarters of the world’s leading TNCs and international organizations is given. The revealed asymmetry in their placement refutes the hypothesis that global cities are equally attractive. Based on the rating and grouping of centers, several types of hubs of new transnational actors were identified, including complex ones headed by “hegemonic cities” (New York, London, Paris), and specialized ones of various ranks – geoeconomic and geopolitical. Given the relevance and significance of the phenomenon of new transnational actors based in urban agglomerations, it is assumed that a productive study of the features of their formation, composition, specialization, placement and interaction mechanisms can become the subject field of a new scientific problem area at the intersection of a number of disciplines  – geopolitical urbanism, which can make a significant contribution to the study of the contours of future global transformations.

1. Abrahamson M. (2004) Global Cities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Abu-Lughod J.L. (1999) New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: Americas’s Global Cities, The University of Minnesota Press.

3. Beaverstock J.V., Smith J.V., Taylor P.J. (1999) A Roster of World Cities. Cities, no 16, pp. 445–458. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00042-6

4. Carroll W.K. (2007) Global Cities in the Global Corporate Network. Environment and Planning, vol. 39, рр. 2297–2323. DOI: 10.1068/a38372

5. Clark D. (2003) Urban World, Global City, London: Routledge.

6. Csomós G. (2013) The Command and Control Centers of the United States (2006/2012): An Analysis of Industry Sectors Influencing the Position of Cities. Geoforum, no 50, pp. 241–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.015

7. Csomós G. (2017) Cities as Command and Control Centers of the World Economy: An Empirical Analysis (2006–2015). Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, no 38, pp. 7–26. DOI: 10.1515/bog-2017-0031

8. Derudder B., Timberlake M., Wiltox F. (2010) Introduction: Mapping Changes in Urban Systems. Urban Studies, vol. 47, no 9, pp. 1835–1841. DOI: 10.1177/0042098010373504

9. Derudder B., Wiltox F. (2010) World Cities and Global Commodity Chains: An Introduction. Global Networks, vol. 10, no 1, рр. 1–11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00271.x

10. Efremov V.S., Vladimirova I.G. (2018) International companies: Scale, structure and development tendencies. Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, vol. 8, no 10А, pp. 400–412. Available at: http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archiveeconomy-2018-10/40-efremov-vladimirova.pdf, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

11. Forbes Global 2000 (2016–2017). The World’s Biggest Public Companies. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/global2000/, accessed 21.04.2020.

12. Fortune Global 500 List of the World’s Biggest Corporations (2016). Available at: https://fortune.com/global500/2016/, accessed 21.04.2020.

13. Friedmann J. (1986) The World City Hypothesis. Development and Change, no 4, pp. 69–83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1986.tb00231.x

14. GaWC. The World According to GaWC (2000–2018). Available at: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/index.html, accessed 21.04.2020.

15. Godfrey B.J., Zhou Y. (2013) Ranking World Cities: Multinational Corporations and the Global Urban Hierarchy. Urban Geography, vol. 20, no 3, pp. 268–281. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.20.3.268

16. Hall P. (1966) The World Cities, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Kalashnikov D.B. (2019) Role of China’s TNCs in Solving the Problems of Modernizing the National Economy, Moscow: MGIMO (in Russian).

17. Karyakin V.V. (2013) Big City in Modern World System. Problem of National Strategy, no 4(19), pp. 207–209. Available at: https://riss.ru/bookstore/journal/2013-2/j19/, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

18. Karyakin V.V. (2018) Geopolitical Regional Studies, Moscow: Archont (in Russian).

19. Kaverin M.A., Malkov S.U. (2014) Trends of International Organizations in Context of Global System Evolution. Bulletin of RUND University, International Relations, no 2, pp. 200–209. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21698522_64425942.pdf, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

20. Kentor J., Sobek A., Timberlake M. (2011) Interlocking Corporate Directorates and the Global City Hierarchy. American Sociological Association, vol. 17, no 2, pp. 498–514. DOI: 10.5195/jwsr.2011.415

21. Khvatov U.U. (2015) Comparative Analysis of Global Cites Competitiveness. European Vector of Economic Development, no 1(18), pp. 195–202 (in Russian).

22. Kratke S. (1) (2014) Global Pharmaceutical and Biotechnolog Firms’ Linkages in the World City Network. Urban Studies, vol. 51, no 6, pp. 1996–1213. DOI: 10.1177/0042098013494420

23. Kratke S. (2) (2014) How Manufacturing Industries Connect Cities Across the World: Extending Research on “Multiple Globalizations”. Global Networks, vol. 14, no 2, pp. 121–147. DOI: 10.1111/glob.12036

24. Kuznetsov A.V. (2019) TNC – Growing of International Role or Adaptation Complication of World Development Trends? Report on International Lichachev’s Readings. Saint Petersburg. Available at: https://www.lihachev.ru/pic/site/files/lihcht/2019/dokladi/KuznetsovAV_plen_ rus_izd.pdf, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

25. Lappo G.M. (1972) Stories about Sites, Moscow: Nauka (in Russian). Lebedeva M.M. (2013) Actors of Modern World Politics: Trends of Development. Bulletin of MGIMO, no 1, pp. 38– 42. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktory-sovremennoy-mirovoypolitiki-trendy-razvitiya/viewer, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

26. Lebedeva M.M. (2017) Soft Power: Notion and Approaches. Bulletin of MGIMO, no 3, pp. 212–223 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2017-3-54-212-223

27. Lüthi S., Thierstein A., Hoyler M. (2018) The World City Network: Evaluating Top-down versus Bottom-up Approaches. Cities, vol. 72, part B, pp. 287– 294. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.006

28. Moreau Defarges Ph. (1998) La Mondialisation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France – PUF.

29. Naumov A.O. (2013) International Nongovernment Organizations and Global Control Problems. State Government. Electronic Bulletin, no 39, pp. 49–76. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhdunarodnye-nepravitelstvennye-organizatsii-i-problemy-globalnogo-upravleniya/viewer, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

30. Neal Z.P. (2011) Differentiating Centrality and Power in the World City Network. Urban Studies, vol. 48, no 13, pp. 2733–2748. DOI: 10.1177/0042098010388954

31. Nye J. (1991) Bound To Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power, New York: Basic Books.

32. Nye J. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs Group.

33. Nye J. (2011) The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.

34. Pilka M.E., Sluka N.A. (2014) Location of Foreign Transnational Corporations in USA Global Cites. Bulletin of Moscow University, Series: Geography, no 4, pp. 75– 82. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razmeschenie-predstavitelstvkrupneyshih-transnatsionalnyh-korporatsiy-v-globalnyh-gorodah-ssha/viewer, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

35. Pilka M.E., Sluka N.A. (2017) Global Cities as the Hubs of Foreign TNC. Bulletin of MGIMO University, no 6(57), pp. 196–206 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2017-6-57-196-206

36. Pilka M., Sluka N. (2019) US Global Cities as Centres of Attraction of Foreign TNCs. Bulletin of Geography. Socioeconomic Series, vol. 46, no 46, pp. 137– 147. DOI: 10.2478/bog-2019-0039

37. Sassen S. (1991) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton, New Jersey.

38. Slavcheva P. (2016) Nongovernment Organizations as Soft Power Diplomatic Tool. Actual Problems of Innovation Economics, no 13, pp. 197–202. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_32614679_71141335.pdf, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

39. Sluka N., Tikunov V., Chereshnia O. (2019) The Geographical Size Index for Ranking and Typology of Cities. Social Indicators Research, vol. 144, no 2, pp. 981– 997. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02069-0

40. Smorodinskaya N.V. (2012) Change of World Economic Development Paradigm and Network Economic Formation. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, vol. 15, no 5, pp. 186–210. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20310471_41236550.pdf, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

41. Smorodinskaya N.V. (2015) Globalized Economics: from Hierarchy to Network Mode, Moscow: Economics Institute of Russian Academy of Science (in Russian). Taylor P.J. (2001) Specification of the World City Network. Geographical Analysis, vol. 33, no 2, pp. 181–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00443.x

42. Taylor P.J. (2004) World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis, Routledge.

43. Taylor P.J. (2005) Leading World Cities: Empirical Evaluations of Urban Nodes in Multiple Networks. Urban Studies, vol. 42, no 9, pp. 1593–1608. DOI: 10.1080/00420980500185504

44. The Yearbook of International Organizations (2017). Brussels: Union of International Associations. Available at: https://uia.org/yearbook, accessed 21.04.2020.

45. Tormosheva V.S. (2017) Actors of Modern Political Space in Contest of Transnationalization. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Politology, no 37, pp. 280–290. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29025201_50509011.pdf, accessed 21.04.2020 (in Russian).

46. UNCTAD. The World Investment Report. 2002–2018. Verhetsel A., Sel S. (2009) World Maritime Cities: From Which Cities do Container Shipping Companies Make Decisions? Transport Policy, vol. 16, no 5, pp. 240–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.08.002

47. Vinciguerra S., Frenken K., Valente M. (2010) The Geography of Internet Infrastructure: An Evolutionary Simulation Approach Based on Preferential Attachment. Urban Studies, vol. 47, no 9, pp. 1969– 1984. DOI: 10.1177/0042098010372685

48. Wall R.S., van der Knaap G.A. (2011) Sectoral Differentiation and Network Structure within Contemporary Worldwide Corporate Networks. Economic Geography, vol. 87, no 3, pp. 267–308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01122.x

49. Wyly E. (2011) Mapping Global Firms and World Cities. Global 350, Introduction to Urban Geography. Available at: http://ibis.geog.ubc.ca/~ewyly/g350/gawc.pdf, accessed 21.04.2020.