GERMANY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: FROM THE ECONOMIC LOCOMOTIVE TO POLITICAL LEADERSHIP
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-1-33-52
Abstract
The article contains analysis of three interlinked topics: the European policy in Germany, an impact of European integration on internal political order of the country and modern state and perspectives of German euroscepticism. The German government has been a proactive leader of both the EU enlargement and deepening of European integration. The author considers the roots of the European policy in Germany and critically assesses its strengths and weaknesses. It is stressed that during the period of rapid growth of the EU in 1990s – beginning of 2000s Berlin played a significant role in the process. However, the crisis of the EU development which had been taking place since the first decade of 2000s remains to be a crucial reason for Germany to correct its European policy and leads to the appearance of unprecedented discourse of euroscepticism, which previously existed only in a form of marginalized narrative. The author presents an analysis of the reasons of German euroscepticism, its organizational structure, electoral support groups and some problems of its appearance and perspectives. Considering some unique characteristics of the German case, the author names such aspects as the absence of direct demands for exit, moderate character of articulated demands and organizational disunity. From the author’s point of view, euroscepticism is closely linked with nationalism, what especially stressed in the German case. The author concludes by saying about potential depletion of political and socio-economical agenda constructed by eurosceptics. It is stated that for German political elites the rise of euroscepticism is a factor which prompts them to rethink European policy and its further development.
About the Author
F. A. Basov
Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fedor A. Basov, Cand. Sci. (Pol.), researcher, Institute of World Economy and
International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences.
117997, Moscow, ul. Profsoyuznaya, 23.
References
1. Albertin L. (Hrsg.). (2010). Deutschland und Frankreich in der Europäischen Union. Tübingen. 225.
2. Antyushina V. V., Baranova K. K., Belov V. B. (ed.) [et al.]. (2015). Modern Germany. Economics and Politics. Moskva: Ves› mir. 720.
3. Arbatova N. K., Kokeev A. M. (ed.). (2013). Crisis of the EU and the perspectives of the European Integration (political aspects). Moskva: IMEMO RAN. 204.
4. Arbatova N. K., Kokeev A. M. (ed.). (2016). European Union at the crossroads: Unresolved Problems and New Challenges (Political Aspects). Moskva: IME-MO RAN. 232.
5. Basov F. A. (2015). German Politics on the EU enlargement. World Economy and International Relations, (4). 18–22.
6. Basov F. A. (2016). Germany, European Parliament and the Politics of Sanctions against Russia. World Economy and International Relations, 60 (12). 62–68. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-12-62-68
7. Baumann R. (2007). Multilateralismus: Die Wandlung eines vermeintlichen Kontinuitätselements der deutschen Außenpolitik. Jäger T., Höse A., Oppermann K. (Hrsg.). Deutsche Aussenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. 442–461.
8. Belov V. B. (red.), Abramova S. V., Baranova K. K. [et al.]. (2009). Germany. The Challenges of the 21st Century. Moskva: Ves’ mir. 788.
9. Butterwegge C., Meier L. (2002). Rechtsextremismus. Freiburg: Herder Verlag. 191.
10. Elzer H. (2008). Konrad Adenauer, Jakob Kaiser und die «kleine Wiedervereinigung ». St. Ingbert: Roehrig Universitatsverlag. 1037.
11. Hellmann G, Roos U. (2007). Das deutsche Streben Nach Einem Ständigen Sitz im UN-Sicherheitsrat. Analyse eines Irrwegs und Skizzen eines Auswegs. INEFReport INEFReport 92/2007. Duisburg: Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden. 88.
12. Kamkin А. К. (2015). “Alternative for Germany” as a New Element of the Political Landscape. Сontemporary Europe, (2). 118–122.
13. Kuznetsov A. V. (2016). Germany: how Stable is the Status of the Leader. Moskva: Ideya-press. 187–196.
14. Muller-Brandeck-Bocquet G. (2011). Deutschlands Bilaterale Beziehungen im Rahmen der EU. Jager T., Hose A., Oppermann K. (Hrsg.). Deutsche Aussenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen. 2-e Ausgabe. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. 605–630.
15. Pavlov N. V., Novikov A. A. (2005). Foreign Policy of Federal Republic of Germany form Adenauer to Schröder. Moskva: Moskovskie uchebniki – SiDiPress. 605.
16. Peggy S. (2012). Der EU-Beitritt der Türkei: Eine Unüberwindbare Hürde? Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag. 108.
17. Scheffler J. (2010). Die Europäische Union als Rechtlich-Institutioneller Akteur im System der Vereinten Nationen. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 918.
18. Schöllgen G. (2004). Die Außenpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. München: C.H. Beck. 278.
19. Shreder G. (2007). Decisions. My Life in Politics. Moskva: Evropa. 552.
Review
For citations:
Basov F.A. GERMANY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: FROM THE ECONOMIC LOCOMOTIVE TO POLITICAL LEADERSHIP. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017;10(1):33-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-1-33-52
Views:
8925
Email this article 