Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Motivations, Preferences, and Barriers to Going Abroad: Russian High-tech Start-ups and Small Innovative Enterprises

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-6-5

Abstract

This article is devoted to studying the motives, preferences, and market entry barriers for Russian high-tech start-ups and small innovative enterprises (SIE) that took part in the “Startup Village” event held at Skolkovo Innovation Centre in May 2019. Due to limitations in neoclassical theories, corporate motivation at the micro-level cannot be accurately quantified. Thus, this work uses survey and interview methods to gather primary data directly from top representatives of participating enterprises. In total, about 100 participants were interviewed. Every respondent expressed intentions to engaged in for eign economic activity; half of them already have experience operating outside of Russia. Further, 44% intend to sell their business or intellectual property rights outright, with only 12% ready to cooperate in a join venture. Based on the analysis of the results, the corporate motives of Russian startups and SIEs going abroad is in seeking: new markets (17.3%), improved efficiency (20.0%), resources (40.0%), and strategic assets (22.7%). This is diverges significantly from the average estimates made by UNCTAD in 2005/2006, where they found motivation from foreign companies in developing and transition economies to be 51%/22%/13%/14%. Against this background, Russian innovative enterprises appear far more resource-oriented and more interested in finding strategic assets. However, they are notably less interested in acquiring new markets or efficiency gains. Additionally, the preferences in foreign partners by Russian enterprises exhi bit some variety. Many choose the CIS countries (mainly Belarus and Kazakhstan) and BRICS nations (primarily China) as desirable partners. Most also express interest in developed economies in the EU (namely Germany). Among the main barriers to establishing foreign relations is the lack of personal finances and other key resources, as well as a lack of state support in promoting Russian companies abroad. Based on the obtained results, impactful recommendations are offered to the government of the Russian Federation to strengthen the investment motivation of Russian innovative enterprises. Also, recommendations are given to advance the international cooperation of BRICS in the form of joint global value chains (GVCs) using their own innovative capability. 

About the Authors

N. U. Seniuk
Assistant Professor National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

 PhD in Economics

101000, Malaya Ordynka St., 17, Moscow



Zachary de Groot
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
101000, Myasnitskaya St., 20, Moscow


References

1. An Overview of the Current Condi-tions and Intensity of Outbound Invest-ment by Chinese Enterprises. 2008–2010 (2011). CCPIT, Beijing: CCPIT.

2. Barney J.V. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, vol. 17, no 1, pp. 99–120. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4

3. Beugelsdijk S., McCann P., Mudambi R. (2010) Introduction: Place, Space and Organization- Economic Geography and the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 10, no 4,485–493. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbq018

4. Buckley P.J., Casson M.C. (1976) The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers.

5. Bulatov A. (2017) Offshore Orientation of Russian Federation FDI. Transnation-al Corporations, vol. 24, no 2, pp. 71–89. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/Publi-cationChapters/diaeia2017d3a3_en.pdf, accessed 12.12.2019.

6. Bulatov A., Kuznetsov A., Kvash-nin Yu., Maltseva A., Seniuk N. (2016) Russian MNCs: Empirical and Theo-retical Aspects. The Challenge of BRICS Multinationals (Progress in Internation-al Business Research, 11) (eds. van Tul-der R., Verbeke A., Carneiro J., Gonzalez-Perez­ M.A.), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 395–421.

7. Cavusgil S.T., Knight G. (2015) The Born Global Firms: An Entrepreneur-ial Perspective on Early and Rapid Inter-nationalization. Journal of International­ Business Studies, vol. 46, no 1, pp. 3–16. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2014.62

8. Coase R.H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, vol. 4, no 16, pp. 386– 405.

9. Cuervo-Cazurra A., Inkpen A., Musac-chio A., Ramaswamy K. (2014) Govern-ments as Owners: State-owned Multina-tional Companies. Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 45, no 8, pp. 919–942. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2014.43

10. Dunning J. (1979) Explaning of Changing Patterns of International Pro-duction: in Defense of Eclectic The-ory. Oxford Journal of Economics and Statistics, vol. 41, no 4, pp. 269–295. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1979.mp41004003.x

11. Dunning J. (1981) Explaining the In-ternational Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Ap-proach. Weltwirschaftliches Archiv, vol. 117, no 1, pp. 30–64. DOI: 10.1007/BF02696577

12. Dunning J. (1986) The Investment Development Cycle to Go Back. Welt-wirschaftliches Archiv, vol. 122, no 4, pp. 667–675. DOI: 10.1007/BF02707854

13. Dunning J. (1988) Explaining Interna-tional Production, London: Unwin Hyman.

14. Dunning J. (1998) Location and Multinational Enterprise: a Neglect-ed Factor? Journal of International Busi-ness Studies, vol. 29, no 1, pp. 45–66. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490024

15. Dunning J., Narula J. (1996) The Way of Investment Development Again: Some Emerging Issues. Foreign Direct Investment and Governments: Catalysts for Economic­ Restructuring (eds. Dunning J.H., Naru-la R.), London and New York: Routledge,1–41.

16. Durand C., Milberg W. (2018) Intellectual Monopoly in Global Value Chains. New School of Social Research. Working Paper 07/2018, New York: New School of Social Research.

17. EDGE Institute (2005). Research Based on Financial Mail Top Companies 2005-SA’s Top Listed Companies Review, June 24 2005, Johannesburg: Institute of the province.

18. Enterprises and Markets in 2005–2009: Results of Two Rounds of Surveys of the Russian Manufacturing Industry (2010). Towards the XI International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social De-velopment. Moscow, 6–8 April 2010, Mos-cow: HSE (in Russian).

19. FIAS/MIGA/IFC/CCER (2005). Over-view of OFDI from China.

20. Fortescue S., Hanson P. (2015) What Drivers Russian Outward Foreign Di-rect Investment? Some Observations on the Steel Industry. Post-Communist Economies, vol. 27, no 3, pp. 283–305. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2015.1055962

21. Fu X., Shen G., Huang S. (2018) Com-petition, Openness and Innovation in the Emerging Economy: the Role of Technol-ogy and Property. Oxford University, De-partment of international development, TMCD Working Paper Series No. 077, Ox-ford, UK: Oxford University.

22. Gao N., Schaaper J. (2018) Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in France: Mo-tivation and Management Style. Manage-ment International, vol. 22, pp. 113–129. Available at: http://www.managementint-ernational.ca/catalog/chinese-foreign-di-rect-investment-in-france-motivations-and-management-style.html, accessed 12.12.2019.

23. Hymer S.H. (1960) The Internation-al Operations of National Firms, a Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Thesis (PhD), Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

24. Johanson J., Vahlne J. (1977) The In-ternationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Com-mitments. Journal of International Busi-ness Studies, vol. 8, no 1, pp. 23–32. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

25. Kalotay K. (2015) Acquisition as En-gines of Foreign Expansion of Russian Mul-tinationals. Handbook of Emerging Market Multinational Corporations (eds. Demir-bag M., Yaprak A.), Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 239–259.

26. Kindleberger C.P. (1969) The Theory of Direct Investment. American Business Abroad (ed. Kindleberger C.), New Haven: Yale University.

27. Kuznetsov A. (2011) Outward FDI from Russia and Its Policy Context. Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International In-vestment. Available at: https://mgimo.ru/ upload/iblock/43c/43ca7b40d3281073fbcd 60af7318a1a3.pdf, accessed 12.12.2019.

28. Kuznetsov A. (2013) Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals after the Crisis: Results of 2011. EMGP Report, 16 April. Moscow and New York: IMEMO and Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable Interna-tional Investment.

29. Kuznetsov A. (2016) Foreign Invest-ments of Russian Companies: Competi-tion with West European and East Asian Multinationals. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 86, no 2, pp. 77–DOI: 10.1134/S1019331616020039

30. Kuznetsov A., Chetverikova A. (2009) Russian Transnational Corporations Con-tinue to Expand Abroad Even in the Con-text of the Global Crisis, Moscow: IMEMO (in Russian).

31. Liuhto K. (2015) Motivation of Rus-sian Firms to Invest Abroad: How Do Sanc-tions Affect Russia’s Outward Foreign Di-rect Investment? Baltic Region, vol. 7, no 4,pp. 4–19. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2015-4-1

32. Lu J., Liu X., Wright M., Filatochev I.(2014) International Experience and FDI Location Choices of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Effects of Home Country Government Support and Host Country Institutions. Journal of International Busi-ness Studies, vol. 45, no 4, pp. 428–449. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2013.68

33. Mathews J. (2006) Dragon Mul-tinationals: New Players in 21st Cen-tury Globalization. Asia Pacific Jour-nal of Management, vol. 23, pp. 5–27. DOI: 10.1007/s10490-006-6113-0

34. Mroczek-Dabrowska K. (2014) Trans-action Cost Theory – Explaining Entry Mode Choices. Poznan University of Eco-nomics, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 48–62. Available at: http://www.ebr.edu.pl/pub/2014_1_48. pdf, accessed 12.12.2019.

35. Nicolas F., Thomsen S. (2008) The Rise of Chinese Firms in Europe: Motives, Strat- egies and Consequences. Research Seminar on Chinese Investment in Europe, Lon-don: Chatham House.

36. North D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institu-tional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

37. Panibratov A. (2017) International Strategy of Emerging Market Firms: Ab-sorbing Global Knowledge and Building Competitive Advantage, Abington and New York: Routledge.

38. Panibratov A., Kolotay K. (2009) Rus-sian Outward FDI and Its Policy Con-text. Columbia FDI Profiles, 13 October, New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sus-tainable International Investment.

39. Penrose E.T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.

40. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. (1978) The Exter-nal Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Approach, New York: Harper and Row.

41. Porter M. (1985) Competitive Advan-tage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Per-formance, New York: Free Press.

42. Russian Statistical Yearbook 2018 (2018). Available at: https://www.gks.ru/ storage/mediabank/year18.pdf, accessed 12.12.2019.

43. 43 .Seniuk N. (2012) China’s Direct In-vestment Abroad. Thesis for the degree of candidate of economic sciences, Moscow: MGIMO(University) (in Russian).

44. UNCTAD (2005). Case Study on the Export of Foreign Direct Investment by Russian Enterprises. Paper Presented at the UNCTAD Expert Meeting on En-hancing Productive Capacity of Develop-ing Country Firms Through Internation-alization, Geneva, 5–7 December. TD/B / COM.3 / EM.26/2 / Add.4.

45. UNCTAD (2006). Global Review of the Development of National TNCs, Geneva and New York: United Nations.

46. Williamson O.E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press.

47. WIR (2006). UNCTAD: World Invest-ment Report 2006.

48. WIR (2019). UNCTAD: World Invest-ment Report 2019.

49. Yang Y., Yin H. (2005) Chinese Foreign Investment Firms. Research for FIAS/IFC/ MIGA, Beijing: China Center for Econom-ic Research, Beijing University.


Review

For citations:


Seniuk N.U., de Groot Z. Motivations, Preferences, and Barriers to Going Abroad: Russian High-tech Start-ups and Small Innovative Enterprises. Global Infrastructure in the Digital Age. 2019;12(6):94-129. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-6-5

Views: 1640


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)