Economic Transformation of Regions of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation

Post-crisis development of national economy substantially is defined by global trends on restoration of growth rates. It is necessary to use the capacity of macro regions of the country among which the important place is taken by the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF). There is a need for a research of ability of structure of economy of the territorial subjects of the federation entering it in whole or in part to adapta tion to the changing managing conditions. It is important to reveal effectiveness of efforts of large and small business, the regional and federal bodies of authority and management, the available market institutes in general directed to activation of economic factors of AZRF. In article the hypothesis of a possibility of assessment of dynamics of change of this structure with the indicators characterizing structure of the gross regional product (GRP) of the territorial subjects of the Russian Federation included in AZRF is made and considered. The research of structure of this indicator is conducted during 2005–2016 with application of the index of structure offered by the author. It is revealed that during the analyzed period of fluctuation of the sizes of shares in structures of GRP of subjects of AZRF significantly differ among themselves. Entry into AZRF into the analyzed period had no significant effect on change of structure of GRP of the entering territorial subjects of the Russian Federation yet. It says about prevalence of the economic practice which developed under the influence of a geographical factor. In subjects of AZRF the trend on reduction of a share of agriculture, hunting and forestry, the processing productions, transport and communication and financial activity with simultaneous increase in a share of mining proceeds. Significant growth in a share of public administration and ensuring military safety is observed; obligatory social insurance at stagnation of the size of a contribution of education, health care and providing social services. Fluctuations of the sizes of shares in structures of GRP of subjects of AZRF are uneven that speaks about preservation of a trend on a variety of structures of regional economies. The insignificant tendency to more balanced participation of subjects of the district in creation of total amount of GRP due to high dynamics of the extracting sector is revealed. In the Arctic in the analyzed years the industrial logic of development assuming large-scale industrial exploitation of natural resources amplified.

1. Васильев В.В., Селин В.С., Терещенко Е.Б. (2009) Социально-экономические последствия ожидаемого изменения климата в Арктике // Регион: экономика и социология. № 2.C. 125-136 // http://ecsocman.hse.ru/ data/2010/06/30/1212816628/Vasiliev.pdf, дата обращения 12.12.2019.

2. Гамукин В.В. (2017) Изменение структуры ВРП в субъектах Уральского федерального округа // Эконо-мика региона. Т. 13. № 2. C. 410-421. DOI: 10.17059/2017-2-7

3. Гранберг А.Г. и др. (2006) Движение регионов России к инновационной экономике. М.: Наука.

4. Исаев А.Г. (2017) Территории опережающего развития: новый инструмент региональной экономической политики // ЭКО. № 4(514). С. 61-77 // https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/territorii-operezhayuschego-razvitiya-novyy-instrument-regionalnoy-ekonomicheskoy-politiki/viewer, дата обращения 12.12.2019.

5. Колунин В.М. (2001) Новая конфигурация стратегических интересов России в Арктическом регионе // Регион: экономика и социология. № 2. С. 21-28 // https://www.sibran.ru/journals/issue. php?ID=120704&ARTICLE_ID=120968, дата обращения 12.12.2019.

6. Минакир П.А., Прокапало О.М. (2017) Централизация и автономизация как факторы социально-эконо-мического развития Дальнего Востока России // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Т. 10. № 6. С. 24-41. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2017.6.54.2

7. Никитина Е.Н. (2018) Арктические трансформации: ТНК перед новыми вызовами устойчивого развития // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. Т. 11. № 1. C. 65-87. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-65-87

8. Пилясов А.Н. (2015) Российский арктический фронтир: парадоксы развития // Регион: экономика и социология. № 3. C. 3-36. DOI: 10.15372/REG20150901

9. Селин В.С., Башмакова Е.П. (2013) Приоритеты современных государственных стратегий развития арктических регионов // Регион: экономика и социология. № 1. С. 3-22 // https://www.sibran.ru/journals/issue. php?ID= 148211&ARTICLE_ID= 148212, дата обращения 12.12.2019.

10. Татаркин А.И., Балашенко В.В., Игнатьева М.Н., Логинов В.Г. (2016) Методический инструментарий оценки инвестиционной привлекательности возобновляемых ресурсов северных и арктических территорий // Экономика региона. № 3. С. 627-637 // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodicheskiy- instrumentariy-otsenki-investitsionnoy - privlekatelnosti-vozobnovlyaemyh-resursov-severnyh-i-arkticheskih-territoriy/ viewer, дата обращения 12.12.2019.

11. Baltagi B.H., Fingleton B., Pirotte A. (2014) Estimating and Forecasting with a Dynamic Spatial Panel Data Model // Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, no 1, pp. 112-138. DOI: 10.1111/obes.12011

12. Butler W.E. (1990) Joint Ventures and the Soviet Arctic // Marine Policy, no 2, pp. 169-176. DOI: 10.1016/0308-597X(90)90104-Y

13. Dudin M., Ivashchenko N., Frolova E., Abashidze A., Smbatyan A. (2016) Innovative Approach to the Development of the Logistics System of Supply of the Arctic Region Space // International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, no 4, pp. 1965-1972 // https://dergipark.org.tr/ tr/download/article-file/366275, дата обращения 12.12.2019.

14. Harsem 0., Eide A., Heen K. (2011) Factors Influencing Future Oil and Gas Prospects in the Arctic // Energy Policy, no 12, pp. 8037-8045. DOI: 10.1016/j.en- pol.2011.09.058

15. Henzel S.R., Lehmann R., Wohlrabe K. (2015) Nowcasting Regional GDP: The Case of the Free State of Saxony // Review of Economics, no 1, pp. 71-98. DOI: 10.1515/roe-2015-0105

16. Kapyla J., Mikkola H. (2016) The Promise of the Geoeconomic Arctic: a Critical Analysis // Asia Europe Journal, no 2, pp. 203-220. DOI: 10.1007/s10308-015-0447-5

17. Kinossian N. (2013) Re-colonising the Arctic: The Preparation of Spatial Planning Policy in Murmansk Oblast, Russia // Environment and Planning C, no 4, pp. 221-238. DOI: 10.1177/0263774X16648331

18. Kopoin A., Moran K., Paré J.P (2013) Forecasting Regional GDP with Factor Models: How Useful Are National and International Data? // Economics Letters, no 2, pp. 267-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.08.007

19. Lehmann R., Wohlrabe K. (2014) Fore¬casting Gross Value-added at the Regional Level: Are Sectoral Disaggregated Predictions Superior to Direct Ones? // Review of Regional Research, no 1, pp. 61-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10037-013-0083-8

20. Lindholt L., Glomsrod S. (2012) The Arctic: No Big Bonanza for the Global Petroleum Industry // Energy Economics, no 5, pp. 1465-1474. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.020

21. Schaeffer E., Block W. (2007) The Economics of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge // Energy & Environment, no 1, pp. 75¬85. DOI: 10.1260/095830507780157221

22. Winkler M. (2013) Imagining the Arctic, the Russian Way: Concepts and Projects for the Arctic Ocean in the Eighteenth Century // New Global Studies, no 2, pp. 73-100. DOI: 10.1515/ngs-2013-010