Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

THE CONCEPT OF NEW DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY AND THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Abstract

Both academic research and political debate have focused on the European Union’s much-mentioned but little-understood ‘democratic deficit’. By contrast, this article shifts the emphasis to the issue of the EU’s crisis of legitimacy. It begins by suggesting that neither the process nor the outcomes of EU-wide decision-making appears to command majority support. Is this lack of democratic legitimacy merely the result of institutional ‘design faults’ or does it reflect a wider and deeper crisis underpinning the EU’s entire political project? My argument is that the dominant models of integration – neo-functional supranationalism and liberal intergovernmentalism – rest on three errors: (1) the primacy of economic integration over political union, which has led to a marketstate that is disembedded from society and a citizenry that is subordinated to the joint rule of the economic and the political; (2) a premature process of constitutionalisation that culminated in the rejection of the 2005 Constitutional Treaty and the flawed Lisbon Treaty; (3) the current institutional arrangements that concentrate power in the hands of supranational institutions and national governments at the expense of the Union’s citizenry. The first section puts the question of democratic legitimacy in the context of the EU’s current slide towards disintegration. Section two provides an account of the EU’s crisis of legitimacy and explores the main causes that have led to this predicament. Section three suggests that some of the origins can be traced to the inception of the European project in the post-1945 era. Section four argues that the prospect for a core EU (around the Eurozone countries) is rapidly receding. Section five outlines a new settlement that focuses on the idea of a Europe of nations, while the final section develops this thinking in the direction of a civic commonwealth that is grounded in the shared culture of European countries.

About the Author

Adrian Pabst
School of Politics and International, University of Kent.
United Kingdom

Adrian Pabst, Ph.D (philosophy of religion), lecturer, School of Politics and International, University of Kent.

Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.



References

1. Brague R. (1999). Europe, la voie romaine. Paris: Gallimard. 272.

2. Cooper R. (2007). The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-first Century, 2nd ed. London: Atlantic Books. 192.

3. Follesdal A., Hix S. (2006). Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44 (3). 534–537. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x

4. Gouguenheim S. (2008). Aristote au Mont Saint-Michel: Les racines grecques de l’Europe chrétienne. Paris: Editions Seuil. 277.

5. Haas E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 552.

6. Hamilton A., Madison J., Jay J., Ball T. (2003). The Federalist with Letters of “Brutus”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 640. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511817816

7. Hix S. (2005). The Political System of the European Union. 2nd rev. ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 306.

8. Kaiser W. (2007). Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 374. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511497056

9. Krastev I. (2016). The Unraveling of the Post-1989 Order. Journal of Democracy, 27 (1). 5–15. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2016.0065

10. Kundnani H. (2015). The Paradox of German Power. London: Hurst. 160. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190245504.001.0001

11. Lachman W. (2016). The German social market economy: its theological justification and role in European integration. Chaplin J., Wilton G. (eds.). God and the EU Faith in the European Project. London: Routledge. 89–108.

12. Luitwieler S. (2015). The EU: Protestant contributions, then and now. Chaplin J., Wilton G. (eds.). God and the EU Faith in the European Project. London: Routledge. 50–69.

13. Majone G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17 (3). 77–101. DOI:10.1080/01402389408425031

14. Majone G. (1998). Europe’s “Democratic Deficit: The Question of Standards. European Law Journal, 4 (1). 5–28. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0386.00040

15. Majone G. (2005). Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 256. DOI:10.1093/0199274304.001.0001

16. Milbank J. (1997). The Word Made Strange. Theology, language, culture. Oxford: Blackwell. 268–292.

17. Milbank J., Pabst A. (2016). The Politics of Virtue. Post-liberalism and the Human Future. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. 418.

18. Mitrany D. (1965). The Prospect of European Integration: Federal or Functional. Journal of Common Market Studies, 4 (2). 119–149. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1965.tb00137.x

19. Moravcsik A. (2002). Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4). 603–624. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00390

20. Overdevest C. (2002). The Open Method of Coordination, New Governance and Learning: Towards a Research Agenda. New Governance Project Working Paper. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

21. Pabst A. (2017). Political Economy and the Constitution of Europe’s Polity: pathways for the common currency beyond ordo-liberal and neo-functionalist models. Cardinale I., Coffman D’Maris, Scazzieri R. (eds.). The Political Economy of the Eurozone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 183–215.

22. Pabst A. (2016). Brexit, post-liberalism, and the politics of paradox. Telos, (176). 189–201. DOI: 10.3817/0916176189

23. Pabst A. (2016). Commonwealth or Market-State? Europe’s Christian heritage and the future of the European polity. Wilton G., Chaplin J. (eds.). God and the EU: Faith in the European project. London: Routledge. 109–128.

24. Polanyi K. (2000). The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press. 357.

25. Rosanvallon P. (2011). Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 235.

26. Sandholtz W., Sweet A. S. (1997). European Integration and Supranational Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (3). 297–317. DOI:10.1080/13501769780000011

27. Siedentop L. (2001). Democracy in Europe. London: Penguin. 272.

28. Sweet A. S., Sandholtz W., Fligstein N. (eds.). (2001). The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 288. DOI: 10.1093/019924796x.001.0001

29. Taylor C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham and London: Duke University Press. 232. DOI: 10.1215/9780822385806

30. Wilton G. (2016). Christianity at the founding: the legacy of Robert Schuman. Chaplin J., Wilton G. (eds.). God and the EU Faith in the European Project. London: Routledge. 13–32.

31. Zielonka J. (2006). Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 293.


Review

For citations:


Pabst A. THE CONCEPT OF NEW DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY AND THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017;10(1):13-32.

Views: 3494


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)