Models of a New World: towards a Synthesis
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-3-189-206
Abstract
Three alternative world orders can be imagined in the post-World War II international relations. During most of the Cold War a bipolar order, centered on the possession of nuclear weapons, existed. This world order was incomplete, however. The United States and the Soviet Union faced each other with equal capacity to destroy each other, but in terms of economic and global influence the United States was superior. The strengthening of economic and technological dynamics increased further the U.S. influence, but also sparked the power of non-states actors, including transnational corporations and banks, independent of states. Simultaneously with the globalization of the world, one could witness the rise of non-state actors in the military and political fields. The emergence of the world order of the third type has sometimes been called the neomedieval world in which some central tenets of feudalism has re-emerged. None of these world order models can be said to dominate in today’s world and none of them is likely to emerge victorious any time soon. In recent times., globalization has suffered from various setbacks and state-centric relations have reemerged. Their focus is not, however, any more on the military competition between the United States and Russia, although some of its elements remain in the arms competition between them. Globalization has brought in new ingredients in the rivalries between states and it has appeared most visibly in the U.S.-Chinese rivalry for economic and technological dominance of the globalized world economy. In other words, a new type of economic bipolarity is winning ground and is only secondarily manifesting itself in military relations. Patterns of warfare has in recent decades been colored by fighting of non-state military forces and the rise of new feudal patterns of behavior, but they have not been pronounced enough to justify the labeling of the entire world order by the name.
About the Author
R. VäyrynenFinland
Professor Emeritus; President Emeritus; Director Emeritus
00100, Temppelikatu 15, Helsinki, Finland
References
1. Service R. (2015) The End of the Cold War 1985–1991, London: Macmillan.
2. Allison G. (2017) Destined for War. Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Appelbaum A. (2012) The Iron Curtain. The Crushing of Eastern Europe 1944–1956, New York: Penguin Books.
4. Sheehan J.J. (2008) Where Have All the Soldiers Gone? The Transformation of Modern Europe, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
5. Armed Conflict Survey (2018), London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
6. Snyder T. (2010) Bloodlands Europe between Hitler and Stalin, London: The Bodley Head.
7. Beckley M. (1) (2018) The Power of Nations. Measuring of What Matters. International Security, vol. 43, no 2, pp. 7–44. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00328
8. Stöver B. (2007) Der kalte Krieg. Geschichte eines radikalen Zeitalters 1947–1991, Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag.
9. Beckley M. (2) (2018) Unrivaled: Why America Will Remain the World’s Sole Superpower, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. Teschke B. (1998) Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory. International Organization, vol. 52, no 2, pp. 325–358. DOI: 10.1162/002081898753162848
11. Bewaffnete Konflikte. Friedensgutachten (2018), Berlin: LIT Verlag.
12. Väyrynen R. (2001) Post-Hegemonic and Post-Socialist Regionalisms: A Comparison of East Asia and Central Europe. Comparing Regionalisms. Implications for Global Development (eds. Hettne B., Inotai A., Sunkel O.), London: Palgrave, pp. 132–185.
13. Biberman Y., Turnbull M. (2018) When Militias Provide Welfare. Lessons from Pakistan and Nigeria. Political Science Quarterly, vol. 133, no 4, pp. 695–727. Available at: https://www.psqonline.org/article.cfm?IDArticle=19849, accessed 30.06.2019.
14. Väyrynen R. (ed.) (2006) The Waning of Major War. Theories and Debates, London: Routledge.
15. Cerny Ph. (1998) Neomedievalism, Civil War and the Security Dilemma. Globalization as a Durable Disorder. Civil Wars, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 36–64. DOI: 10.1080/13698249808402366
16. Westad O.A. (2007) The Global Cold War. Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Chanda N. (2007) Bound Together. How Traders, Preachers, Adventures, and Warriors Shaped Globalization, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Westad O.A. (2017) The Cold War. A World History, London: Allen Lane.
19. Dibb P. (1986) The Soviet Union: The Incomplete Superpower, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
20. Epstein S.B. (2000) Freedom and Growth. The Rise of States and Markets in Europe, 1300–1750, London: Routledge.
21. Ferguson N. (2006) The War of the World. Twentieth-Century Conflict and the Descent of the West, New York: Penguin
22. Freedman L. (2017) The Future of War. A History, London: Allen Lane.
23. Freeman J.B. (2018) Behemoth: A History of the Factory and the Making of the Modern World, New York: W.W. Norton.
24. Friedberg A.L. (2018) Competing with China. Survival, vol. 60, no 3, pp. 7–64. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2018.1470755
25. Frieden J. (2006) Global Capitalism. Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century, New York: W.W. Norton.
26. Gat A. (2006) War in Human Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Hurrell A. (2007) One World? Many Models? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society. International Affairs, vol. 83, no 1, pp. 127–146. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00606.x
28. Ikenberry J.G. (2016) Between the Eagle and the Dragon: America, China, and Middle State Strategies in East Asia. Political Science Quarterly, vol. 131, no 3, pp. 9–43. DOI: 10.1002/polq.12430
29. Joas H. (2000) Kriege und Werte: Studien zur Gewaltgeschicte des 20. Jahrhunderts, Weiterswist: Velbrüch Wissenschaft.
30. Kotz D. (2018) End of the Neoliberal Era? Crisis and Restructuring in American Capitalism. New Left Review, no 113, pp. 29–55. Available at: https://newleftreview.org/issues/II113/articles/davidkotz-end-of-the-neoliberal-era, accessed 30.06.2019.
31. Kriedte P. (1980) Spätfeudalismus und Handelskapital: Grundlinien der europäischen Wirtschaftsgesichte vom 16. bis zum Ausgang des 18. Jahrhunderts, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
32. Maher R. (2018) Bipolarity and the Future of U.S. – Chinese Relations. Political Science Quarterly, vol. 133, no 3, pp. 497–525. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Maher2/publication/327757395_Bipolarity_and_the_Future_of_US-China_Relations_US-CHINA_BIPOLARITY/links/5ba6172a299bf13e6043c412/Bipolarity-and-the-Future-of-US-China-Relations-US-CHINA-BIPOLARITY.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019.
33. Mason M. (2018) Turbulent Empires. A History of Global Capitalism since 1945, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
34. Mazover M. (2012) Governing the World. The History of an Idea, London: Allen Lane.
35. Piketty Th. (2013) Le capital au XXle siècle, Paris: Ėditions du Seuil.
36. Sands Ph. (2016) East West Street. On the Origins of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
37. Scheidel W. (2017) The Great Leveler. Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stoner Age to the Twenty-first Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Service R. (2015) The End of the Cold War 1985–1991, London: Macmillan.
39. Sheehan J.J. (2008) Where Have All the Soldiers Gone? The Transformation of Modern Europe, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
40. Snyder T. (2010) Bloodlands Europe between Hitler and Stalin, London: The Bodley Head.
41. Stöver B. (2007) Der kalte Krieg. Geschichte eines radikalen Zeitalters 1947–1991, Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag.
42. Teschke B. (1998) Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory. International Organization, vol. 52, no 2, pp. 325–358. DOI: 10.1162/002081898753162848
43. Väyrynen R. (2001) Post-Hegemonic and Post-Socialist Regionalisms: A Comparison of East Asia and Central Europe. Comparing Regionalisms. Implications for Global Development (eds. Hettne B., Inotai A., Sunkel O.), London: Palgrave, pp. 132–185.
44. Väyrynen R. (ed.) (2006) The Waning of Major War. Theories and Debates, London: Routledge.
45. Westad O.A. (2007) The Global Cold War. Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Westad O.A. (2017) The Cold War. A World History, London: Allen Lane.
Review
For citations:
Väyrynen R. Models of a New World: towards a Synthesis. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2019;12(3):189-206. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-3-189-206