The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-3-170-188
Abstract
In this paper, we first attempt to track post-WWII shifts in the balance of power between a number of big powers in the international system. By relying on a number of possible proxies for power in the international arena, we argue that what the international system is going through today is not a relatively indiscriminate diffusion of power from the centre towards the periphery, but a marked rise of China that seems to have left the rest of the “emerging world” behind. We then delve deeper into the foreign policies of the US and China, the two main powers in this seemingly neo-bipolar system. We find that risks of confrontation are rising. On the one hand, this is related to the US’s continued preference for a strategy bent on “primacy”, rather than on strategic restraint. On the other hand, Beijing’s foreign policy is growing increasingly assertive, and does not hide anymore within the rhetoric of the “peaceful rise”. We conclude by showing that this shift in international power, coupled by the grand strategies preferred by China and the US, are imperilling the fragile scaffolding of global governance. The risk is that, rather than leading us towards a new but sustainable global order, the transition will only lead us backwards: to a world in which rules are less confidently upholded, and where the logic of the balance of power and of arms races further gains momentum.
About the Author
P. Magri
Italian Institute of International Political Studies (ISPI)
Italy
Italy
Executive Vice President and Director
20121, Via Clerici, 5, Milano, Italy
References
1. Military Expenditure Database (2018). SIPRI. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex, accessed 30.06.2019.
2. Abi-Habib M. (2018) China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Plan in Pakistan Takes a Military Turn. The New York Times, December 19, 2018. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/world/asia/pakistan-china-belt-road-military.html, accessed 30.06.2019.
3. Amighini A. (2017) China’s Belt and Road: A Game Changer? ISPI, Milano: Edizioni Epoké.
4. Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance (1995). The Global Development Research Center, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/global-neighbourhood/, accessed 30.06.2019.
5. Art R.J. (1998) Geopolitics Updated: The Strategy of Selective Engagement. International Security, vol. 23, no 3, pp. 79–113. DOI: 10.2307/2539339
6. Patrick S. M. (2017) Trump and World Order: the Return of Self Help. Foreign Affairs, vol. 96, no 2, pp. 52–57. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2017-02-13/trump-and-world-order, accessed 30.06.2019.
7. Beckley M. (2010) Economic Development and Military Effectiveness. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 33, no 1, pp. 43–79. DOI: 10.1515/peps-2015-0016
8. Porter P. (2018) Why America’s Grand Strategy Has not Changed. International Security, vol. 42, no 4, pp. 9–46. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00311
9. Betts R.K. (2005) US National Security Strategy: Lenses and Landmarks, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
10. Posen B.R., Ross A.L. (1996) Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy. International Security, vol. 21, no 3, pp. 5–53. DOI: 10.1162/isec.21.3.5
11. Bolt J., Inklaar R., de Jong H., van Zanden J.L. (2018) Rebasing ‘Maddison’: New Income Comparisons and the Shape of Long-run Economic Development, Maddison Project Working paper 10.
12. Public Uncertain, Divided over America’s Place in the World (2016). Pew Research Center, May 5, 2016. Available at: https://www.people-press.org/2016/05/05/publicuncertain-divided-over-americas-placein-the-world/, accessed 30.06.2019.
13. Borger J., Chulov M. (2018) Trump Shocks Allies and Advisers with Plan to Pull US Troops out of Syria. The Guardian, December 20, 2018. Available at: https://www. theguardian.com/usnews/2018/dec/19/us-troops-syria-withdrawal-trump, accessed 30.06.2019.
14. Qin Y. (2011) Rule, Rules, and Relations: Towards a Synthetic Approach to Governance. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 117–145. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/por008
15. Boys J.D. (2015) Clinton’s Grand Strategy: US Foreign Policy in a Pot-Cold War World, New York: Bloomsbury.
16. Riegl M., Landosky J., Valko I. (eds.) (2014) Strategic Regions in 21st Century Power Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
17. Brewster R. (2018) The Trump Administration and the Future of the WTO. Yale Journal of International Law Online, no 44. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3328929, accessed 30.06.2019.
18. Rosenau J.N. (1995) Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Global Governance, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 13–43.
19. Cai K.G. (2018) The One Belt One Road and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Beijing’s New Strategy of Geoeconomics and Geopolitics. Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 27, no 114, pp. 831–847. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1488101
20. Sanger D.E., Haberman M. (2016) 50 G.O.P. Officials Warn Donald Trump Would Put Nation’s Security at Risk. The New York Times, August 8, 2016. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/us/politics/national-security-gop-donald-trump.html, accessed 30.06.2019.
21. Ferguson R.J. (2018) China’s Eurasian Dilemmas: Roads and Risks for a Sustainable Global Power, Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar Publishing.
22. Schake K. (2016) Will Washington Abandon the Order? The False Logic of Retreat. Foreign Affairs, vol. 96, no 1, pp. 41–46. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/will-washington-abandon-order, accessed 30.06.2019.
23. Flint C., Zhu C. (2018) The Geopolitics of Connectivity, Cooperation, and Hegemonic Competition: The Belt and Road Initiative. Geoforum, vol. 99, pp. 95–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.12.008
24. Schweller R.L., Pu X. (2011) After Unipolarity: China’s Vision of International Order in an Era of US Decline. International Security, vol. 36, no 1, pp. 41–72. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00044
25. Friedberg A.L. (2011) A Contest for Supremacy: China, America and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
26. Sidaway J.D., Woon C.Y. (2017) Chinese Narratives on “One Belt, One Road” in Geopolitical and Imperial Contexts. The Professional Geographer, vol. 69, no 4, pp. 591–603 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1288576
27. Gagliano A. (2018) Blurred Lines: Twenty-First Century Maritime Security in the South China Sea. Eurasia’s Maritime Rise and Global Security (ed. Gresh G.F.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 113–127.
28. Smith J. (2011) G7 to G8 to G20: Evolution in Global Governance. CIGI G20 Papers, No. 6. Available at: https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/g20no6.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019.
29. Gilpin R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. South China Sea Dispute: China Lands Bombers on Island (2018). BBC, May 19, 2018. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-44180773, accessed 30.06.2019.
31. Goldgeier J., Chollet D. (2008) America between the Wars: From 11/9 to 9/11, New York: Public Affairs.
32. Stein J. (2018) US Military Budget Inches Closer to $1 Trillion Mark, as Concerns over Federal Deficit Grow. Washington Post, June 19, 2018. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/19/u-s-military-budgetinches-closer-to-1-trillion-mark-as-concerns-over-federal-deficit-grow/?utm_term=.71f2cab75207, accessed 30.06.2019.
33. Grieco J.M. (1988) Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization, vol. 42, no 3, pp. 485–507. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027715
34. Stephen M.D., Skidmore D. (2019) The AIIB in the Liberal International Order. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 61–91. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/poy021
35. Guzzini S. (2009) On the Measure of Power and the Power of Measure in International Relations. DIIS Working Paper. No. 28.
36. Villafranca A. (2016) At the Crossroads of New Global Governance: China’s AIIB and the Western World. ISPI Analysis, No. 304, September 2016. Available at: https://www.ispionline.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/analisi304_villafranca_02-09-2016.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019.
37. Held D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. Walt S.M. (2018) The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of US Primacy, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
39. Henning C.R., Walter A. (eds.) (2016) Global Financial Governance Confronts the Rising Powers: Emerging Perspectives of the New G20, Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
40. Waltz K.N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, McGraw-Hill.
41. Huntington S. (1999) The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs, vol. 78, no 2, pp. 35–49. DOI: 10.2307/20049207
42. World Bank and AIIB Sign Cooperation Framework, Press Release (2017). World Bank, April 23, 2017. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2017/04/23/world-bankand-aiib-sign-cooperation-framework, accessed 30.06.2019.
43. Ikenberry G.J. (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
44. Zhao S. (2017) China and the South China Sea Arbitration: Geopolitics versus International Law. Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 27, no 109, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2017.1363012
45. Jervis R. (1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46. Yu B. (2018) From Global Governance to Global Disorder? Implications for Russia and China. Sino-Russian Relations in the 21st Century (eds. Bekkevolg J.I., Lo B.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 191–214.
47. Johnston A.I., Shen M. (eds.) (2015) Perception and Misperception in American and Chinese Views of the Other, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
48. Johnson J. (2017) Trump on NATO: I Said It Was Obsolete. It’s No Longer Obsolete. Washington Post, April 12, 2017. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/04/12/trump-on-nato-i-said-it-was-obsolete-its-no-longer-obsolete/?utm_term=.962ea4d575f9, accessed 30.06.2019.
49. Kahler M. (2017) Regional Challenges to Global Governance. Global Policy, vol. 8, no 1, pp. 97–100. Available at: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/articles/global-governance/regional-challenges-global-governance, accessed 30.06.2019.
50. Kirkpatrick J. (1990) A Normal Country in a Normal Time. National Interest, no 21, pp. 40–45.
51. Krauthammer C. (1990) The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no 1, pp. 23–33. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/1991-02-01/unipolar-moment, accessed 30.06.2019.
52. Magri P. (2017) Governance and International Regimes. Global Encyclopaedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (ed. Farazmand A.), pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1781-1
53. Mearsheimer J.J. (1994) The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, vol. 19, no 3, pp. 5–49. DOI: 10.2307/2539078
54. Mearsheimer J.J., Walt S.M. (2016) The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior Grand Strategy. Foreign Affairs, vol. 95, no 4, pp. 70–83. Available at: http://managinghistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/The-Case-for-Offshore-Balancing.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019.
55. Military Expenditure Database (2018). SIPRI. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex, accessed 30.06.2019.
56. Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance (1995). The Global Development Research Center, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/global-neighbourhood/, accessed 30.06.2019.
57. Patrick S. M. (2017) Trump and World Order: the Return of Self Help. Foreign Affairs, vol. 96, no 2, pp. 52–57. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2017-02-13/trump-and-world-order, accessed 30.06.2019.
58. Porter P. (2018) Why America’s Grand Strategy Has not Changed. International Security, vol. 42, no 4, pp. 9–46. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00311
59. Posen B.R., Ross A.L. (1996) Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy. International Security, vol. 21, no 3, pp. 5–53. DOI: 10.1162/isec.21.3.5
60. Public Uncertain, Divided over America’s Place in the World (2016). Pew Research Center, May 5, 2016. Available at: https://www.people-press.org/2016/05/05/publicuncertain-divided-over-americas-placein-the-world/, accessed 30.06.2019.
61. Qin Y. (2011) Rule, Rules, and Relations: Towards a Synthetic Approach to Governance. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 117–145. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/por008
62. Riegl M., Landosky J., Valko I. (eds.) (2014) Strategic Regions in 21st Century Power Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
63. Rosenau J.N. (1995) Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Global Governance, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 13–43.
64. Sanger D.E., Haberman M. (2016) 50 G.O.P. Officials Warn Donald Trump Would Put Nation’s Security at Risk. The New York Times, August 8, 2016. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/us/politics/national-security-gop-donald-trump.html, accessed 30.06.2019.
65. Schake K. (2016) Will Washington Abandon the Order? The False Logic of Retreat. Foreign Affairs, vol. 96, no 1, pp. 41–46. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/will-washington-abandon-order, accessed 30.06.2019.
66. Schweller R.L., Pu X. (2011) After Unipolarity: China’s Vision of International Order in an Era of US Decline. International Security, vol. 36, no 1, pp. 41–72. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00044
67. Sidaway J.D., Woon C.Y. (2017) Chinese Narratives on “One Belt, One Road” in Geopolitical and Imperial Contexts. The Professional Geographer, vol. 69, no 4, pp. 591–603 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1288576
68. Smith J. (2011) G7 to G8 to G20: Evolution in Global Governance. CIGI G20 Papers, No. 6. Available at: https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/g20no6.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019.
69. South China Sea Dispute: China Lands Bombers on Island (2018). BBC, May 19, 2018. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-44180773, accessed 30.06.2019.
70. Stein J. (2018) US Military Budget Inches Closer to $1 Trillion Mark, as Concerns over Federal Deficit Grow. Washington Post, June 19, 2018. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/19/u-s-military-budgetinches-closer-to-1-trillion-mark-as-concerns-over-federal-deficit-grow/?utm_term=.71f2cab75207, accessed 30.06.2019.
71. Stephen M.D., Skidmore D. (2019) The AIIB in the Liberal International Order. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 61–91. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/poy021
72. Villafranca A. (2016) At the Crossroads of New Global Governance: China’s AIIB and the Western World. ISPI Analysis, No. 304, September 2016. Available at: https://www.ispionline.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/analisi304_villafranca_02-09-2016.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019.
73. Walt S.M. (2018) The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of US Primacy, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
74. Waltz K.N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, McGraw-Hill.
75. World Bank and AIIB Sign Cooperation Framework, Press Release (2017). World Bank, April 23, 2017. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2017/04/23/world-bankand-aiib-sign-cooperation-framework, accessed 30.06.2019.
76. Zhao S. (2017) China and the South China Sea Arbitration: Geopolitics versus International Law. Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 27, no 109, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2017.1363012
77. Yu B. (2018) From Global Governance to Global Disorder? Implications for Russia and China. Sino-Russian Relations in the 21st Century (eds. Bekkevolg J.I., Lo B.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 191–214.
Review
For citations:
Magri P. The Emerging New Global (Dis)Order. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2019;12(3):170-188. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-3-170-188
Views:
1307
Email this article 