Britain and the European Union: a Difficult Path to Post-Brexit
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the consequences of the referendum on the UK’s membership in the European Union. The causes that contributed to the radical transformation of political processes and crisis phenomena in the framework of European integration processes are revealed. It is noted that the crisis of the British model of democracy and the rise of “monitoring democracy”, as well as the constitutional reforms in the UK, which were not brought to a logical conclusion, influenced the effectiveness of political institutions. The range of new complex issues of constitutional, legal, financial, economic, social and humanitarian nature that need to be addressed in the context of brexit is determined.
The features of the development and implementation of the strategies of the United Kingdom and the European Union on the negotiation process are considered. The most important stages of negotiations on the problem of developing an agreement defining the conditions and principles of relations between the parties in the post-brexit period are studied. Particular attention is paid to the key controversial issues - the implementation of the financial obligations of the United Kingdom to the EU, guarantees the rights of EU citizens and their families living in the UK, as well as the preservation of the free movement of people, goods, services and capital between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
The author analyzes internal and external factors that have a direct impact on the course of the dialogue, arguments and counter-arguments of the parties, the reasons for the change in the positions of the United Kingdom and EU leaders on key issues of cooperation in the new historical conditions. There is a deep split between British society and the main political forces of the country on the issue of withdrawal from the EU. The factors that led the UK to a serious political crisis and the inability to develop an adequate and effective brexit strategy are considered.
About the Author
I. G. KovalevRussian Federation
DSc in History, Professor, School of International Affairs
101000, Myasnitskaya St., 20, Moscow, Russian Federation
References
1. Dorey P. (2008) The Labour Party and Constitutional Reform, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Drake M. (2018) Remoaners Blair, Clegg and Heseltine INSULT 17.4M ‘naïve’ Brexit Voters in Angry Letter. Express, October 17, 2018. Available at: https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1032646/brexit-news-tony-blair-nick-clegg-michael-heseltine-referendum-people-svote-eu, accessed 30.06.2019.
3. James W., MacLellan К. (2016) May Builds new-Look Brexit Cabinet to Steer EU Divorce. Reuters, July 14, 2016. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-wrapupidUSKCN0ZU1HE, accessed 30.06.2019.
4. Keane J. (2009) The Life and Death of Democracy, New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.
5. Lilico A. (2017) What Could Labour Push for on a “Softer Brexit” and Would Conservative MPs Support It? Reaction, June 13, 2017. Available at: https://reaction.life/labour-push-softer-brexit-conservative-mps-support/, accessed 30.06.2019.
6. Matthijs M. (2018) The Worst Brexit Option, Except for All the Others. Foreign Affairs, December 20, 2018. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-kingdom/2018-12-20/worstbrexit-option-except-all-others, accessed 30.06.2019.
7. Menon A. (2017) Why the British Chose Brexit. Foreign Affairs. November/December Issue. Available at:
8. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2017-10-16/why-britishchose-brexit, accessed 30.06.2019.
9. Piper E., MacLellan K. (2018) Labour Will Vote against PM May’s Chequers Brexit Plan, Says Corbyn. Reuters, September 26, 2018. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-labour/labour-will-vote-against-pm-mays-chequers-brexit-plan-says-corbyn-idUSKCN1M52Y0, accessed 30.06.2019.
10. Romanova T. (2016) The Crises of the European Union and Its Future. Russia in Global Affairs. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/valday/Krizisy-Evropeiskogo-soyuza-i-ego-buduschee-18320, accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).
11. Russell M., Cornes R. (2001) The Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords: A House for the Future? The Modern Law Review, vol. 64, no 1, pp. 82–99. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/modlr64&div=14&id=&page=&t=1560239451, accessed 30.06.2019.
12. Saunders R. (2019) How Britain Embraced Referendums, the Tool of Dictators and Demagogues. The Economist, January 17, 2019. Available at: https://www.economist.com/open-future/2019/01/17/howbritain-embraced-referendums-the-toolof-dictators-and-demagogues, accessed
13. 06.2019.
Review
For citations:
Kovalev I.G. Britain and the European Union: a Difficult Path to Post-Brexit. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2019;12(3):151-169. (In Russ.)