Concepts of South-South Economic Cooperation

The paper traces the evolution of conceptual approaches to South-South economic cooperation. It is shown that with the collapse of the bipolar system and the rise of globalization the interest in South-South cooperation have risen again, and compared to the 1950–1970-ies focuses more on economic relations of developing countries. At the same time, the article shows that the deepening differentiation of the countries of the global South allows us to consider the South-South dialogue as ambiguous process. According to the author, this is a set of relations of very different level of interaction between developing countries, which are part of a more fundamental process of transformation of the existing “Westcentric” world order. The paper identifies four such levels, characterized by very different opportunities for participating in economic ties between developing countries: relations of major countries of the South with each other (especially in BRICS and IBSA groups); the interaction of the largest countries with other developing countries (most known for the cooperation in the framework of “One belt, one road” Chinese initiative); intensive contacts of countries of the global South due to the objectively existing neighborhood effect (the most famous integration groupings are ASEAN in Southeast Asia and MERCOSUR in Latin America); and cross-border ties of small developing countries geographically distant from each other. The paper concludes that South-South cooperation cannot be a full-fledged alternative to other global economic ties. Indeed, countries of the global North dominate in many areas and more often still offer mutually beneficial cooperation to developing countries, so that isolation from the global North is akin to autarky. South-South cooperation should be viewed primarily as a way to develop additional forms of interaction different from that dominant in the contemporary world, prescribed mainly taking into account the views of several leading economic powers. Thus, it is correct to speak of South- non-West cooperation, referring to rather developed countries that are not able to build relations with the US and key EU countries (e.g. Russia). 

1. Amanor K.S. (2013) South-South Cooperation in Africa: Historical, Geopolitical and Political Economy Dimensions of International Development. IDS Bulletin, vol. 44, no 4, pp. 20–30. DOI: 10.1111/1759-5436.12039

2. Balassa B. (1961) Towards a Theory of Economic Integration. Kyklos, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435-1961.tb02365.x

3. Bereznoy A.V. (1986) International Companies from Developing Countries: Foreign Expansion of National Entrepreneurial Capital, Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

4. Bezuidenhout H. (2016) The Dimensions of FDI in the Tourism Sector in Africa. The Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 32, no 4, pp. 1115–1136. DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v32i4.9724

5. Bragina E.A. (2017) India in the Context of South-South Interrelations. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 61, no 2, pp. 113–118. Available at: https://www.imemo.ru/jour/meimo/index.php?page_id=1248&file=https://imemo.ru/files/File/magazines/meimo/02_2017/113-118Bragina.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).

6. Chaturvedi S (2016) The Development Compact: A Theoretical Construct for South-South Cooperation. International Studies, vol. 53, no 1, pp. 15–43. DOI: 10.1177/0020881717705927

7. Cheru F. (2016) Emerging Southern Powers and New Forms of South-South Cooperation: Ethiopia’s Strategic Engagement with China and India. Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, no 4, pp. 592–610. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1116368

8. Elyanov A.Ya. (2012) Globalization and Development. World Economy and International Relations, no 11, pp. 3–15. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_18084983_36807687.pdf, accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).

9. Forging a Path Beyond Borders: The Global South (2018). UNCTAD, Geneva: United Nations.

10. Galishcheva N.V. (2011) Contemporary Foreign Economic Strategy of India: South-South Cooperation. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no 5, pp. 96–106. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/sovremennayavneshneekonomicheskaya-strategiya-indii-sotrudnichestvo-yug-yug, accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).

11. Gray K., Gills B.K. (2016) South-South Cooperation and the Rise of the Global South. Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, no 4, pp. 557–574. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1128817

12. Jules T.D., de sá e Silva M.M. (2008) How Different Disciplines Have Approached South-South Cooperation and Transfer. Society for International Education Journal, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 45–64. Available at: http://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=education_facpubs, accessed 30.06.2019.

13. Kostyunina G.M., Baronov V.I. (2018) Specifics of Regional Integration Agreements with Participation of China within the South-South Model. Vestnik RUDN: International Relations, vol. 18, no 3, pp. 612–627. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/osobennosti-regionalnyh-integratsionnyh-soglasheniy-suchastiem-kitaya-v-ramkah-modeli-yugyug, accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).

14. Modi R. (ed.) (2011) South-South Cooperation: Africa on the Central Stage, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

15. Muhr T. (2016) Beyond ‘BRICS’: Ten Theses on South-South Cooperation in the Twenty-first Century. Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, no 4, pp. 630–648. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1108161

16. Nayyar D. (2006) Globalisation, History and Development: A Tale of Two Centuries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no 1, pp. 137–159. DOI: 10.1093/cje/bei090

17. Pavlova E.B. (2017) Colonial Heritage as Problem and Resource for South-South Cooperation: A Case of Brazil. Vestnik RUDN: International Relations, vol. 17, no 1, pp. 48–58. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/kolonialnoe-naslediekak-problema-i-resurs-sotrudnichestva-yug-yug-sluchay-brazilii,accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).

18. Renzio P. de, Seifert J. (2014) South-South Cooperation and the Future of Development Assistance: Mapping Actors and Options. Third World Quarterly, vol. 35, no 10, pp. 1860–1875. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2014.971603

19. Shishkov Yu.V. (2001) Integration Processes on the Eve of the 21st Century. Why are CIS Countries Not Integrating, Moscow: 3rd tisyacheletie (in Russian).

20. Sternberg T. (2012) Chinese Drought, Bread and the Arab Spring. Applied Geography, vol. 34, pp. 519–524. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.02.004

21. Stuenkel O. (2016) Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers Are Remaking Global Order, Cambridge: Polity Press.

22. Vieira M.A., Alden Ch. (2011) India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA): South-South Cooperation and the Paradox of Regional Leadership. Global Governance, vol. 17, no 4, pp. 507–528. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/glogo17&div=42&id=&page=, accessed 30.06.2019.

23. Volodin A.G. (2003) Contemporary Theories of Modernization: Crisis of the Paradigm. Political Science, no 2, pp. 8–29. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/sovremennye-teorii-modernizatsii-krizis-paradigmy, accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).

24. Yakovlev P.P. (2017) Integration in Latin America: Centripetal and Centrifugal Trends. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, no 4, pp. 86–100 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-4-86-100

25. Zuev V.N. (2014) Methodology of Classification and Estimates of Regional Integration Forms. Eurasian Economic Integration, no 3, pp. 25–43. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/metodologiya-klassifikatsii-i-otsenkiform-regionalnoy-integratsii, accessed 30.06.2019 (in Russian).