The EAEU as Perceived by the Western Scientific and Expert Community (Bibliographic Essay)

In the context of the ongoing crisis in EU-Russia relations, the search for new formats of economic dialogue becomes particularly relevant. With the assistance of the Eurasian Economic Commission, various platforms are being created to explore the possibilities for cooperation between the EAEU and the EU in the areas of trade, investment, convergence of technological standards, etc., with the participation of leading experts and business circles. However, despite the gradual growth of interest in issues of Eurasian economic integration within the Western scientific and expert community, skepticism regarding the EAEU still prevails. The EAEU itself is mostly seen as a political project initiated by Russia and unable to bring real economic benefits to its member countries. US and European observers dwell on unequal economic opportunities of the EAEU countries, insufficient mutual trade and mixed consequences of the transition to common customs tariffs for Kazakhstan and Armenia. Moreover, in many European publications the EAEU is perceived not as a possible economic partner of the EU, but as its geopolitical competitor. Most experts conclude that cooperation between the EU and the EAEU is either impossible or possible only on a limited scale. Nevertheless, the attitude of Western experts towards the EAEU is gradually changing. Integration processes in the Post-Soviet space are increasingly viewed through the prism of the theory of new regionalism. It is noted that the EAEU, as well as another project in Eurasia - the Silk Road Economic Belt, may become an alternative to Western models of integration. Over the past four years, besides economic costs, Eurasian integration has also brought certain dividends to its members, which, however, do not always lie on the surface and are often of a political nature. In this regard, some European experts and scholars (although they still constitute a minority), mainly from Germany and Austria, admit that it is counterproductive for the EU to ignore the EAEU, and advocate for cooperation between them.

1. Alekseenkova E., Hallgren H., Hauk-kala H., Hett E, Kellner A.M., Lyubashen-ko I., Mardirossian E, Romanova T., Sha-rashenidze T., Vorotnyuk M., Wanninger J. (2016) A Shared European Home. The European Union, Russia and the Eastern Partnership, Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Available at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/12546.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

2. Aslund A. (2013) Ukraine’s Choice: European Association Agreement or Eurasian Union? Peterson Institute for International Economics. No. PB13-22. Available at: https://piie.com/publications/pb/pb13-22.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

3. Blockmans S., Kostanyan H., Voro-biev E. (2012) Towards a Eurasian Economic Union: The Challenge of Integration and Unity. CEPS Special Report. No. 75, December 14, 2012. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2190294, accessed 31.03.2019.

4. Bond I. (2017) The EU, the Eurasian Economic Union and One Belt, One Road. Can They Work Together? Center for European Reform, March 2017. Available at: https://cer.eu/sites/default/files/pb_eurasian_IB_16.3.17_0.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

5. Cadier D. (2014) Eastern Partnership vs Eurasian Union? The EU-Rus-sia Competition in the Shared Neighbourhood and the Ukraine Crisis. Global Policy, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 76-85. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12152

6. Cohen A. (2013) Russia’s Eurasian Union Could Endanger the Neighborhood and U.S. Interests. The Heritage Foundation. Backgrounder No. 2804. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/europe/report/russias-eurasian-union-could-endanger-the-neighborhood, accessed 31.03.2019.

7. De Micco P. (2015) When Choosing Means Losing The Eastern Partners, the EU and the Eurasian Economic Union. European Parliament: Directorate-General for External Policies. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegDa-ta/etudes/STUD/2015/549026/EXPO_STUD%282015%29549026_EN.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019. DOI: 10.2861/240124

8. Dienes A. (2018) Engage! Why the European Union Should Talk with the Eurasian Economic Union, Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Available at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/wien/14541.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

9. Dragneva R., Wolczuk K. (2017) The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. Chatham House: Russia and Eurasia Programme, May 2, 2017. Available at: https://www.chatham-house.org/publication/eurasian-econom-ic-union-deals-rules-and-exercise-power, accessed 31.03.2019.

10. Dreyer I., Popescu N. (2014) The Eurasian Customs Union: The Economics and the Politics. European Union Institute for Security Studies. Available at: https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Brief_11_Eurasian_Union.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

11. Frear M. (2013) Belarus: Player and Pawn in the Integration Game. Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and tics (eds. Dragneva R., Wolczuk K.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 119-138.

12. Giucci R., Mdinaradze A. (2017) The Eurasian Economic Union. Analysis from a Trade Policy Perspective. Berlin Economics, April 11, 2017. Available at: https://ber-lin-economics.com/wp-content/uploads/EAEU-11-April-2017_en.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

13. Hartwell С. (2016) Improving Competitiveness in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union: a Blueprint for the Next Decade. Post-Communist Economies, vol. 28, no 1, pp. 49-71. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2015.1124554

14. Havlik P (2015) The Silk Road: Challenges for the European Union and Eurasia. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. Available at: https://wi-iw.ac.at/the-silk-road-challenges-for-the-european-union-and-eurasia-dlp-3763.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

15. Hett F., Szkola S. (eds.) (2015) The Eurasian Economic Union: Analyses and Perspectives from Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/11181.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

16. Kabat P, Vinokurov E., Rovenskaya E., Emerson M., Khavlik P, Balash P, Stepanova А., Kofner Yu., Pereboev V (2016) European Union and Eurasian Economic Union: Long-Term Dialogue and Perspectives of Agreement, Saint Petersburg: EDB Center for Integration Studies (in Russian).

17. Kardas S., Klysinski K. (2017) The Story that Never Ends. A New Stage in the Energy Dispute between Russia and Belarus. Osrodek Studiow Wschodnich, May 17, 2017. Available at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commen-tary/2017-05-17/story-never-ends-a-new-stage-energy-dispute-between-russia-and, accessed 31.03.2019.

18. Kasciunas L. (ed.) (2012) Eurasian Union: a Challenge for the European Union and Eastern Partnership Countries, Vilnius: Eastern European Studies Center.

19. Klimanskis S. (2016) Eurasian Economic Union - Reality or Fiction? DELFI by the Lithuania Tribune, November 25, 2016. Available at: https://en.delfi.lt/opin-ion/eurasian-economic-union-reali-ty-or-fiction.d?id=72980044, accessed 31.03.2019.

20. Kondrateva N.B. (2017) Eurasian Economic Union: Achievements and Prospects. Europe in the 21st Century: New Challenges and Risks (eds. Gromyko Al. A., Fedorov VP), Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ., pp. 383-398 (in Russian).

21. Lane D. (2014) Eurasian Integration as a Response to Neo-Liberal Globalisation. Valdai Discussion Club, February 5, 2014. Available at: http://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/eurasian_integration_as_a_re-sponse_to_neo_liberal_globalisation, accessed 31.03.2019.

22. Lane D. (2016) Which Way Forward for the Eurasian Economic Union? Valdai Discussion Club, April 21, 2016. Available at: http://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/which-way-forward-for-the-eurasian-eco-nomic-union, accessed 31.03.2019.

23. Libman A.M. (2012) Studies of Regional Integration in the CIS and Central Asia: A Literature Survey, Saint Petersburg: EDB Center for Integration Studies (in Russian).

24. Michel C. (2014) Eurasian Union. Why the Russian President’s Dream of “Near abroad’ Linked to Moscow Might Be Less than the Sum of Its Parts. Foreign Policy, June 5, 2014. Available at: https://for-eignpolicy.com/2014/06/05/vladimir-pu-tins-impotent-eurasian-union, accessed 31.03.2019.

25. Popescu N. (2014) Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely. EU Institute for Security Studies. Chaillot Papers. No. 132, September 2014. Available at: https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/CP_132.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

26. Roberts S., Moshes A. (2016) The Eurasian Economic Union: A Case of Reproductive Integration? Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 32, no 6, pp. 542-565. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2015.1115198

27. Ryabov A.V. (2018) Post-Soviet Space: Factors and Cycles of Development. Russia and New States of Eurasia, no 3, pp. 67-82 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/2073-4786-2018-3-67-82

28. Shtraks G. (2018) Next Steps in the Merger of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Belt and Road Initiative. The Jamestown Foundation, June 19, 2018. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/next-steps-in-the-merger-of-the-eurasian-eco-nomic-union-and-the-belt-and-road-ini-tiative, accessed 31.03.2019.

29. Shumylo-Tapiola O. (2012) Ukraine at the Crossroads: Between the EU DCFTA & Customs Union, Paris: IFRI.

30. Starr S., Cornell S. (eds.) (2014) Putins Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and Its Discontents, Washington, D.C.: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program.

31. Tarr D. (2016) The Eurasian Economic Union among Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic: Can It Succeed Where Its Predecessor Failed? Eastern European Economics, vol. 54, no 1, pp. 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/00128775.2015.1105672

32. The Eurasian Economic Union: Power, Politics and Trade, Brussels: International Crisis Group (2016). ICG. Europe and Central Asia Report No. 240, July 20, 2016. Available at: https://d2071andvip-0wj.cloudfront.net/240-the-eurasian-eco-nomic-union-power-politics-and-trade.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

33. Think Tank Atlas: Russian Studies Abroad (2016). Available at: http://rethink-ingrussia.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Атлас-аналитических-центров.pdf accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

34. Vieira A.V.G. (2015) Eurasian Integration: Elite Perspectives before and after the Ukraine Crisis. Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 32, no 6, pp. 566-580. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2015.1118200

35. Vielmini F. (1) (2013) Armenia’s Shift towards the Eurasian Economic Union: a Rejoinder of Realpolitik. ISPI Commentary, October 25, 2013. Available at: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/armenias-shift-towards-eurasian-economic-union-rejoinder-realpoli-tik-9283, accessed 31.03.2019.

36. Vielmini F. (2) (2013) The Challenges of Eurasian Integration for Kazakhstan. ISPI Analysis. No. 151. Available at: https://www.ispionline.it/it/docu-ments/Analysis_151_2013.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

37. Vilpisauskas R. (2015) Should the EU Recognize the Eurasian Economic Union as a Negotiating Partner? European Leadership Network, March 5, 2015. Available at: https://www.europeanlead-ershipnetwork.org/commentary/should-the-eu-recognise-the-eurasian-econom-ic-union-as-a-negotiating-partner, accessed 31.03.2019.