Foreign Trade Relations of the Visegrad Group: the Transformation of the Role of the Russian Federation
Abstract
The article analyzes changes in the foreign trade sector of the Visegrad countries after their entry to the European Union with special focus on relations with Russia. The territorial orientation of trade relations of Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic is considered. The author highlights the continuing trend of the EU’s market priority for the Visegrad group against the background of strengthening the role of partner countries of “four” and the Asian vector. Special attention is paid to the sectoral structure of foreign trade of the Visegrad countries and its transformation since 2003. The Russian Federation’s role in foreign trade of Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic is analyzed not only in terms of the priority of the Russian direction, but also the possibilities of changing existing positions. The dynamics of the Russian positions in foreign trade sectors of four Viseg-rad countries are considered highlighting the main factors influencing trade relations. In this regard, the changed in 2014 political and economic conditions of mutual trade including the factor of sanctions are analyzed in detail. The sectoral structure of trade relations with Russia allows to say that there are remaining imbalances and it’s atypical for the Visegrad countries. The Russian positions in the foreign trade of the Visegrad countries at present time are estimated as weakened, corresponding to the period of the early 2000s which are a consequence of the influence of one of the long-term and negative factors in recent years while the trade structure maintains relatively stable. The existing dynamics of recovery of trade relations between Russia and Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic suggests that reaching the pre-crisis level will not happen in the near future.
About the Author
A. S. ChetverikovaRussian Federation
Anna S. Chetverikova - PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher, Center for European Studies.
117997, Profsoyuznaya St., 23, Moscow
References
1. Bazhan A.I. (2017) Economic Cooperation between Russia and the Visegrad Group in Modern Condition. Contemporary Europe, no 7, pp. 114-123. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_32706952_68883645.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).
2. Cheklina T.N. (2009) Trade and Economic Relations of Russia with CEE Countries: Results and Prospects. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, no 8, pp. 4152. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/down-load/elibrary_15139564_53888680.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).
3. Erokhin V., Heijman W., Ivolga A. (2014) Trade Tensions between EU and Russia: Possible Effects on Trade in Agricultural Commodities for Visegrad Countries. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 52-57. DOI: 10.2478/vjbsd-2014-0010
4. Gyarfasova O., Meseznikov G. (2016) 25 Years of the V4 as Seen by the Public, Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs.
5. Hunya G., Richter S. (2011) Mutual Trade and Investment of the Visegrad Countries before and after Their EU Accession. Eastern Journal of European Studies, vol. 2, no 2, pp. 77-91. Available at: http://www.ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2011_0202_HUN.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.
6. Ivanova E., Masarova J. (2018) Performance Evaluation of the Visegrad Group Countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanya, vol. 31, no 1, pp. 270-289. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2018.1429944
7. Knyazev Yu.K. (ed.) (2015) The Countries of Central and Eastern Europe in the Western Sanction War against Russia: Political Positions and Economic Consequences, Moscow: Institute of economics RAN (in Russian).
8. Krulis K. (2015) Internal Market among V4 Countries: Energizing Stakeholders’ Activity to Press for Its Smoother Functioning, Association for international affaires.
9. Kulikova N.V (ed.) (2018) Central-Eastern Europe in Search of New Sources of Development, Moscow: Institute of economics RAN (in Russian).
10. Orlik 1.1. (2015) Differentiation of Central Eastern Europe and Relations with Russia, Moscow: Institute of economics RAN (in Russian).
11. Rashch M. (2013) Poland - Russia: Economic Cooperation after the Russian Federation’s Accession to the WTO. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Series 6, no 3, pp. 113-120. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/rossiya-polsha-ekonomicheskoe-sotrudnichestvo-posle-vstupleniya-rossii-v-vto, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).
12. Savelyev O., Khetagurova Z. (2016) Anti-Dumping Measures against Russian Exporters: Opportunities for Removing. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 60, no 11, pp. 25-34 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-11-25-34
13. Shishelina L.N. (ed.) (2017) The Visegrad Four in the European Union: Dilemmas of Convergence, Moscow: Institute of Europe RAN (in Russian).
14. Svatos M., Smutka L. (2012) Development of Agricultural Trade and Competitiveness of the Commodity Structures of Individual Countries of the Visegrad Group. Agricultural Economics, vol. 58, no 5, pp. 222-238. DOI: 10.17221/51/2011-AGRICECON
15. UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2016. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/Publi-cationsLibrary/tdstat41_en.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.
16. Veligorskij A.N. (2006) Transformation of Foreign Trade Policy in CEE Countries: Some Trends and Results. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Series 5, no 2, pp. 133-141. Available at: https://economicsjournal.spbu.ru/ar-ticle/view/4301, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).
17. WTO. World Trade Statistical Review 2018. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2018_e/wts2018_e.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.
18. Zysk W., Smiech S. (2014) The Influence of Foreign Direct Investment on Foreign Trade in the Visegrad Countries from 2001 to 2011. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, vol. 2, no 3, pp. 7-18. DOI: 10.15678/EBER.2014.020302
Review
For citations:
Chetverikova A.S. Foreign Trade Relations of the Visegrad Group: the Transformation of the Role of the Russian Federation. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2019;12(2):197-211. (In Russ.)