The EU-Russia Geopolitical Contradictions and Participation of the Post-Soviet States in Regional Economic Integration

Starting from the late 2000s, the Post-Soviet states have faced the so-called integration dilemma. Seeking to deepen their trade relations and economic links with the regional centers of force - the European Union and Russia - they found themselves increasingly compelled to choose between two integration projects: either joining the EU Association Agreement and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area or developing relations with Russia and several other interested members of the CIS under the auspices of the Customs Union and Single Economic Space (Eurasian Economic Union since 2015).

This paper purports to demonstrate that, although both tracks were declared to be economic by nature and were not publicly opposing each other, it was geopolitical reasoning that has dominated the deliberations of the five Eastern European members of the CIS in assessing and choosing between the two. The paper contrasts these countries’ political strategies and approaches to the integration dilemma and examines the internal and external factors behind these approaches. We explain why, despite the apparent similarity of the economies and interests of some of the states in question, their political strategies have diverged considerably under changing geopolitical circumstances. Finally, the paper evaluates the prospects of further engagement of Eastern European CIS countries in the integration projects.

1. Balassa B. (1962) The Theory of Economic Integration, London: Allen Unwin.

2. Balmaceda M.M. (2014) Will Cheap Russian Gas Save Ukraine? Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 61, no 2, pp. 61-67. DOI: 10.2753/PPC1075-821661020

3. Benesova I., Smutka L. (2016) The Post-Soviet Countries - Development and Structure of Economy: Is There Any Potential for Future Regional Integration? 19th International Conference Enterprise and Competitive Environment, March 2016, pp. 30-31. Available at: https://ac.els-cdn.eom/S18770428-16305675/1-s2.0-S1877042816305675-main.pdf?_tid=1a513e9f-2303-4e70-bd2c-9d53f529d8b0&acdnat=1551796182_df8500d9e89d63e00fef3024f6589b05, accessed 31.03.2019.

4. Bordachev T.V., Romanova T.A. (2003) Model for Growth. Russia in Global Affairs, no 2. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/n_868, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

5. Butorina O.V (ed.) (2011) Regional Integration: Basic Concepts, Moscow: Business Literature (in Russian).

6. Delcour L. (2015) Between the Eastern Partnership and Eurasian Integration: Explaining Post-Soviet Countries’ Engagement in (Competing) Region-Building Projects. Problems of PostCommunism, vol. 62, no 6, pp. 316-327. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1057075

7. Deutsch K.W (1969) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, New York.

8. DiCaprio A., Santos-Paulino A., Sokolova M. (2017) Regional Trade Agreements, Integration, and Development. UNCTAD Research Paper. No. 1. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/publication-slibrary/ser_rp2017d1_en.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

9. Ferguson I. (2018) Between NewSpheres ofInfluence: Ukraine’s Geopolitical Misfortune. Geopolitics, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 285-306. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2017.1402299

10. Gotz E. (2015) It’s Geopolitics, Stupid: Explaining Russia’s Ukraine Policy. Global Affairs, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 3-10. DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2015.960184

11. Ivanov I.D. (1998) The Expansion of the European Union: Scenario, Problems, Consequences. World Economy and International Relations, no 9, pp. 22-23 (in Russian).

12. Karaganov S.A. (2010) European Union: Last Chance? Rossijskaya gazeta, June 9, 2010. Available at: https://rg.ru/2010/07/09/karaganov.html, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

13. Kaveshnikov N.Yu. (2008) Small and Harmful? International Trends, no 3, pp. 8492. Available at: http://intertrends.ru/old/eighteenth/011.htm, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

14. Kondrateva N.B. (2015) EAEU - EU: Integration of Integrations on the Horizon. Contemporary Europe, no 4(64), pp. 147149. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/down-load/elibrary_25023687_73790414.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

15. Korejba Y. (2012) International Organisations as a Catalyst for Integration Choice of Post-Soviet Space Countries in Europe. International Organisations Research Journal, no 2, pp. 118132. Available at: https://iorj.hse.ru/da-ta/2012/06/08/1252691721/8.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

16. Letnyakov D. (2016) Nation-Building: Identity Policies in Post-Soviet States. Mir Rossii, vol. 25, no 2, pp. 144-167. Available at: https://mirros.hse.ru/article/view/4906/5271, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

17. Libman А.М. (2012) Post-Soviet Integration and Political Systems of Post-Soviet States. Russia and New States of Eurasia, no 4(17), pp. 5-22. Available at: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/magazines/rossia_i_novay/2012_04/ALIB_postsoviet.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

18. Lukin A. (2014) Eurasian Integration and the Clash of Values. Survival, vol. 56, no 3, pp. 43-60. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2014.920144

19. Marocchi T. (2017) EU-Russia Relations: Towards an Increasingly Geopolitical Paradigm. Heinrich Boll Stiftung, July 3, 2017. Available at: https://eu.boell.org/en/2017/07/03/eu-russia-relations-towards-increasingly-geopolitical-para-digm, accessed 31.03.2019.

20. Mattoo A., Mulabdic A., Ruta M. (2017) Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in Deep Agreements. World Bank. No. 8206, September 27, 2017. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/208101506520778449/Trade-creation-and-trade-diversion-in-deep-agreements, accessed 31.03.2019.

21. Nitoiu C., Sus M. (2019) The Rise of Geopolitics in the EU’s Approach in Its Eastern Neighbourhood. Geopolitics, vol. 24, no 1, pp. 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1544396

22. Schweller R. (1994) Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security, vol. 19, no 1, pp. 72-107. Available at: http://home.so-gang.ac.kr/sites/jaechun/courses/Lists/b7/Attachments/17/Bandwagoning%20for%20Pofits.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

23. Skriba A.S. (2014) Balancing of Small and Medium-Sized Nations. International Trends, no 4(39), pp. 88-100. Available at: http://intertrends.ru/system/Doc/ArticlePdf/185/Skriba-39.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

24. Statement on the Pressure Exercised by Russia on Countries of the Eastern Partnership (2013). European Commission, European Parliament Plenary, September 11, 2013. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-687_en.htm, accessed 31.03.2019.

25. te Velde D.W. (2011) Regional Integration, Growth and Convergence. Journal of Economic Integration, vol. 26, no 1, pp. 1-28. Available at: https://www.e-jei.org/upload/06406631627345U6.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

26. Timmermann H. (2002) Russia and the European Union: Current Trends in Foreign Policy, Security Policy and Economy. View from Germany. Urgent Problems of Europe, no 1, pp. 69-89. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/rossiya-i-evropeyskiy-soyuz-sovremen-nye-tendentsii-vo-vneshney-politike-poli-tike-bezopasnosti-i-ekonomike-vzglyad-iz-germanii, accessed 31.03.2019 (in Russian).

27. Tsymburskij V.L. (1997) Peoples among Civilizations. Pro et Contra, no 3, pp. 154184 (in Russian).

28. Vamvakidis (1999) Regional Trade Agreements or Broad Liberalization: Which Path Leads to Faster Growth? IMF Staff Papers, vol. 46, no 1, pp. 42-68. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/view-doc/download?doi=10.1.1.195.7456&rep=rep1&type=pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.