Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Dilemmas of the European Defence Union

Abstract

The article explores the newest trends in Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union as one of the most dynamic fields of еuropean integration. In the EU the discourse on the strategic autonomy and strategic culture develops rapidly against the backdrop of Brex-it and transformation of relationship with the US. The history of European integration repeatedly poses a question whether the EU is capable of becoming an independent subject of international relations with its own politico-military potential based on the principle of strategic autonomy. The author examines dilemmas of the European defence union (EDU), with PESCO in its core, the key role of France and Germany in its promotion and development. Among the main issues scrutinized are recent events in the sphere of common defence policy, attitudes to the idea of the European army, dialectics of CSDP and NATO. A conclusion is drawn that in the near future the leading priority for EDU will consist in deepening integration among EU member states’ military-industrial complexes, strengthening their competitiveness versus the USA. The author holds that the politico-military potential of the EU is an objective requirement for the organisation with global economic interests and that it will receive further stimulus as a result of Brexit. The interests of security of the EU and non-Western centres of power will be better served if this potential transforms into effective EDU rather than be incorporated into the European pillar of NATO. The opposite development, including building up of “defence Schengen”, incorporation of the Alliance’s european members in the military planning, directed against Russia, dilution of neutrality of several member states of the EU will lead to further corrosion of european security and global stability.

About the Author

A. A. Gromyko
Institute of Europe,Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Alexey A. Gromyko - Corresponding member RAS, DSc in Politics, President of the Association of European Studies (AES), Director

125009, Mokhovaya St., 11/3, Moscow



References

1. Bachmann D., Bunde T., Maderspach-er Q., Oroz A., Scherf G., Wittek K. (2017) More European, More Connected, More Capable: Building the European Armed Forces of the Future. Munich Security Conference, McKinsey & Company and Hertie School of Governance, November 2017. Available at: http://european-defense-report.securi-tyconference.de, accessed 31.03.2019.

2. Barrie D., Barry B., Boyd H., Chagnaud M.-L., Childs N., Giegerich B., Moiling Ch., Schutz T. (2018) Protecting Europe: Meeting the EU’s Military Level of Ambition in the Context of Brexit. International Institute for Strategic Studies, Deutsche Ge-sellschaft fur Auswartige Politik, November 28, 2018. Available at: https://dgap.org/de/article/getFullPDF/31639, accessed 31.03.2019.

3. Belov V.B. (ed.) (2018) Protection of State Sovereignty - the Experience of the European Union and European Countries, Moscow: Institut Evropy RAN (in Russian).

4. Billon-Galland A., Efstathiou Y.-S. (2019) Are PESCO Projects Fit for Purpose? European Leadership Network, February 20, 2019. Available at: https://www.euro-peanleadershipnetwork.org/policy-brief/are-pesco-projects-fit-for-purpose/, accessed 31.03.2019.

5. Billon-Galland A., Thomson A. (2018) European Stategic Autonomy: Stop Talking, Start Planning. European Leadership Network, May 11, 2018. Available at: https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/policy-brief/european-strategic-au-tonomy-stop-talking-start-planning/, accessed 31.03.2019.

6. Biscop S. (1) (2019) 1919-2019: How to Make Peace Last? European Strategy and the Future of the World Order. Security Policy Briefs. Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations. Available at: http://www.egmontinstitute.be/1919-2019-how-to-make-peace-last, accessed 31.03.2019.

7. Biscop S. (2) (2019) Fighting for Europe. European Strategic Autonomy and the Use of Force. Egmont Paper 103, January 2019. Available at: http://www.egmon-tinstitute.be/content/uploads/2019/01/EP103.pdf?type=pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

8. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union. Article 42 (2008). EUR-lex.europa.eu. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TxT/?u-ri=CELEX%3A12008M042, accessed 31.03.2019.

9. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No. 10) on Permanent Structured Cooperation Established by Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union (2008). EUR-lex.europa.eu. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:12008M/PRO/10&from=EN, accessed 31.03.2019.

10. Council Decision Establishing Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and Determining the List of Participating Member States (2017). Council of the European Union, December 8, 2017. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/32000/st14866en17.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

11. Criekemans D. (2018) Security Threats in Europe: Possibilities and Obstacles for EU - Russia Cooperation. The EU - Russia: The Way out or the Way down? (ed. Potemkina O.), Moscow: Institute of Europe, Egmont, pp. 28-33.

12. Danilov D.A. (2018) The Formation of New Tools and Mechanisms for HSE. European Union: Facts and Comments. Issue 93 (eds. Borko Yu.A., Butorina O.V., Zhurkin V.V., Potemkina O.Yu.), Moscow: IE RAN, AEVIS, pp. 74-77 (in Russian).

13. Daslder I., Lindsay J. (2018) The Empty Throne: America’s Abdication of Global Leadership, New York: Public Affairs.

14. Draft Report on Annual Report on the Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (2018/2099(INI)) (2018). European Parliament, September 20, 2018. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CoMPARL&re-ference=PE-625.376&format=PDF&language=EN&secondRef=01, accessed 31.03.2019.

15. European Parliament Resolution of 12 December 2018 on the Annual Report on the Implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy (2018/2099(INI)) (2018). European Parliament, December 12, 2018. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2018-0514+0+-DOC+XML+V0//EN, accessed 31.03.2019.

16. European Parliament Resolution of 22 November 2016 on the European Defence Union (2016/2052(INI)) (2016). European Parliament, November 22, 2016. Available at: http://www.europarl.eu-ropa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&refer-ence=P8-TA-2016-0435&language=EN, accessed 31.03.2019.

17. Fedorov S.M. (2018). The Macron Plan for Europe: A New Start for the European Project in the 21st Century. Contemporary Europe, no 6, pp. 30-39 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15211/soveurope620183039

18. Fiott D. (2018) Strategic Autonomy: Towards ‘European Sovereignty’ in Defence? EUISS Issue Brief. No. 12, November 30, 2018. Available at: https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/strategic-autonomy-towards-%E2%80%98european-sove-reignty%E2%80%99-defence, accessed 31.03.2019.

19. Godovanuyk K.A. (2018) Consequences of Brexit for a Common EU Security and Defense Policy. The Future of Europe: Global Challenges and Possible Answers. Report of the Institute of Europe, no 351, Moscow: IE RAN, pp. 14-19 (in Russian).

20. Gould J. (2018) NATO Official Warns EU Force Would Be Unwise. Defence News, November 17, 2018. Available at: https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2018/11/17/nato-official-warns-eu-force-would-be-unwise, accessed 31.03.2019.

21. Gromyko Al.A. (2018) The West Divided: Consequences for Euro-Atlantic. Contemporary Europe, no 4, pp. 5-16 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15211/soveurope420180516

22. Implementation Plan on Security and Defence (2016). Council of the European Union, November 14, 2016. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

23. Kunz B. (2018) The Three Dimensions of Europe’s Defense Debate. Policy Brief. No. 24, The German Marshall Fund of the United States, 21 June 2018.

24. Marrone A., Maulny J.-P., Fattibene D., Stabile A.A. (eds.) (2018) Boosting Defense Cooperation in Europe: An Analysis of Key Military Capabilities, Istituto Affari Inter-nazionali, Institut de Relations Internationales et Strategiques, Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Polish Institute of International Affairs, Royal United Services Institute.

25. Mehta A. (2018) Portugal’s Defence Minister Targets NATO Defence Spending Goals. Defence News, June 25, 2018. Available at: https://www.defensenews.com/smr/nato-priorities/2018/06/25/portugals-defense-minister-targets-na-to-defense-spending-goals, accessed 31.03.2019.

26. Miglio A. (2017) A Schengen of Defence? Integrating Existing Clusters of Inter-State Defence Cooperation into the EU Legal Framework. Centre of Studies on Federalism. Policy Paper. No. 23, July 2017. Available at: http://www.csfederalis-mo.it/en/publications/policy-paper/1288-a-schengen-of-defence-integrating-exist-ing-clusters-of-inter-state-defence-coop-eration-into-the-eu-legal-framework, accessed 31.03.2019.

27. National Security Strategy of the United Nations of America (2017). White House, December 2017. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Fi-nal-12-18-2017-0905.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

28. Notification on Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) to the Council and to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. European Council of the European Union. Available at: https://www.consilium.eu-ropa.eu/media/31511/171113-pesco-noti-fication.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

29. Nye J.S. Jr. (2019) The Rise and Fall of American Hegemony From Wilson to Trump. International Affairs, vol. 95, no 1, pp. 63-80. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiy212

30. Over 10,000 Troops from Nine Nations Ready to Meet Global Challenges (2018). GOV.UK, June 28, 2018. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/over-10000-troops-from-nine-nations-ready-to-meet-global-challenges, accessed 31.03.2019.

31. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy (2016). European External Action Service, June 2016. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf, accessed 31.03.2019.

32. Stone J. (2018) EU Army: Brussels ‘Delighted’ that Angela Merkel and Macron Want to Create European Military Force. Independent, November 14, 2018. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/eu-army-ange-la-merkel-macron-germany-france-mil-itary-european-commission-junck-er-a8633196.html, accessed 31.03.2019.

33. Timoshenkova E.P. (2018) How Sovereign is United Germany in Reality? Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, no 6, pp. 172-176 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran6201813

34. Vasilev V.I., Kokeev A.M. (eds.) (2018) The Changing Role of Germany in the European Integration and Transatlantic Processes. Analytical report, Moscow: IMEMO RAN (in Russian).

35. We Need a European Army, Says Jean-Claude Juncker (2015). BBC News, March 9, 2015. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31796337, accessed 31.03.2019.

36. Zachary Y. (2018) Macron: Europe Can’t Depend on US for Security. Politico.eu, August 27, 2018. Available at: https://www.po-litico.eu/article/europe-defense-macron-cant-depend-on-us-for-security/, accessed 31.03.2019.

37. Zhurkin V.V. (2012) European Army: Defeats and Victories. General Security and Defense Policy of the European Union, Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya (in Russian).

38. Zhurkin V.V. (2018) About Idea of EU’s Security Council. Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, no 4, pp. 4-5 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15 211/vestnikieran4201845


Review

For citations:


Gromyko A.A. Dilemmas of the European Defence Union. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2019;12(2):6-28. (In Russ.)

Views: 2446


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)