Russia, China and the Pacific Countries of Latin America: Opportunities for Multilateral Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region

The article is devoted to the problems of the development of modern relations of Russia, China and the  Pacific states of Latin America. Author focuses on potential of cooperation of these states in multilateral  formats and dialogues and the reform of the economic and institutional order in the Asia-Pacific. The  relevance of such cooperation is increasing due to the crisis of the international order that has emerged  in the Asia-Pacific region. This crisis manifests itself in two aspects. First, we may observe a certain lack  of institutions of regulation of economic relations and ideas for their further development. Such a  complex agenda is shaped by Russia and China in relation to Eurasia (the concept of “Greater Eurasia”),  but the promotion of a similar agenda in the APEC faces many contradictions. Second, the Asia-Pacific region is becoming an area of confrontation between the United States and China, which is also  manifested in the struggle for the future configuration of the regional order in the region. The Pacific  countries of Latin America were not affected by either the Russian or Chinese mega-initiatives of recent  years, which are aimed precisely at creating a new international order. Meanwhile, these countries are  APEC members and participants in many regional initiatives, as well as potentially significant economic  partners for both Russia and China. Moreover, the author believes that a similar level of economic  development and similar needs objectively bring together the views and approaches of the leading  Eurasian powers and the Pacific states of Latin America to the development of multilateral institutions of  the regional order. However, the historically established institutional and political linkage of these  countries to the United States currently determines their support for American initiatives. This provision, however, is not a given, and some irregularity of the American regional policy under the Trump  administration makes the development of dialogue with these countries on the broad problems of  multilateral cooperation in Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific region even more in demand. The author  considers the proposed analysis and some conclusions as an opportunity for academic and expert  discussion on the identified issues. 

1. Aniskevich N. (2017) Latin America between MERCOSUR and the Pacific Alliance: Political Risks and Regional Stability. Klio, no 9, pp. 136–145 (in Russian).

2. Devadason E. (2014) The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): the Chinese Perspective. Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 23, no 87, pp. 462–479. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2013.843890

3. Ermolieva E. (2018) Latin America at the Turning Point. Latin America, no 7, pp. 88–94 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0000026-7

4. Green M., Gill B. (2009) Asia’s New Multilateralism: Cooperation, Competition, and the Search for Community, Columbia University Press.

5. Karaganov S. (2017) From Turn to the East to Greater Eurasia. Russia in Global Affairs, May 30, 2017. Available at: https://www.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/Otpovorota-na-Vostok-k-Bolshoi-Evrazii-18739, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

6. Khmelevskaya N.G. (2014) Integration Processes in Latin America through the Prism of Regional Trade (for Example, MERCOSUR and the Pacific Alliance). Ibero-American Notebooks. Issue 3(5), pp. 131–141. Available at: http://imi-mgimo.ru/images/pdf/Iberoamerikanskie_tetradi/CI35.pdf#page=131, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

7. Kostunina G. (2012) APEC: Structures Activities and Achievements. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, no 10, pp. 33– 46. Available at: http://www.rfej.ru/rvv/id/20047A8AA/$file/33-46.pdf, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

8. Lavut A. (2017) Trans-Pacific Partnership, Donald Trump and Latin American integration. Latin America, no 9, pp. 19–35. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29935527_50868813.pdf, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

9. Lukin A. (2018) China and Russia. The New Rapprochement, Cambridge: Polity Press.

10. Lukin A., Korotich S. (2017) The Asia-Pacific Alliances of the United States: between Balancing, Neutralization and Hedging. World Economy and International Affairs, no 4, pp. 5–15 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-4-5-15

11. Petri P., Plummer M., Zhai F. (2012) The Trans-Pacific Partnership And Asia- Pacific Integration: A Quantitative Assessment, Washington: PIIE.

12. Prebisch R. (2016) The Economic Development of Latin America. ECLAC Thinking, Selected Texts (1948–1998), Santiago: ECLAC, pp. 45–84.

13. Prestowitz C. (2004) Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and The Failure Of Good Intentions, New York: Basic Books. Razmovky D. (2015) Latin American Integration and Extra-Region Cooperation. Prospects for Russia. World Economy and International Affairs, no 8, pp. 82–91. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23881606_68050057.pdf, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

14. Shkokyar N. (2017) Revision of NAFTA Is a Threat for Mexico. Latin America, no 3, pp. 43–49. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28912675_41634805.pdf, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

15. Sizonenko A. (2011) Russia – Latin America: New Approaches of Research. Latin America, no 4, pp. 4–9. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_16219872_36991708.pdf, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

16. Stiglitz J. (2002) Globalization and its Discontents, New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company. Sudarev V. (2017) Donald Trump and Latin America. Latin America, no 2, pp. 5–11. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_28912660_53866708.pdf, accessed 31.01.2019 (in Russian).

17. Sung-Hoon P., Lee J. (2009) APEC at Crossroads: Challenges and Opportunities. Asian Perspective, vol. 33, no 2, pp. 97–124. DOI: 10.1353/apr.2009.0019