Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Economic Regionalism as a Planetary Phenomenon. Theory And Methodology of Comparison

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-4-38-53

Abstract

Nowadays integration could be considered as worldwide-political phenomenon with its multielement structure. The growing integratedness allows the little and medium states to build a constructive conversation with important players, equalize the growth rates, life quality as well as to contribute to settlement of international conflicts. This article deals with the theory and methodology of Economic Integration in Europe. The author investigates the roots of integration processes in after-war period in Europe. With establishment of European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) in 1951 the integration became a key element of international policy. The author revises the evolution of the Integration theory from implementing of “federalism” term till development of comparative integration area in international relations science. The author used original foreign and Russian sources for preparing the current article.

About the Author

Andrey A. Baykov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Pol.), ViceRector for Graduate and International Programs, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia

76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454



References

1. Acharya A. (2004). How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organizations, 58 (2). 239–275.

2. Arapova E. Ja., Baykov A.A. (2012). Regional Financial Integration in East Asia. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 3(30). 98–107.

3. Balassa B. (1982). The Theory of Economic Integration. Westport: Greenwood Press Reprint. 304.

4. Baykov A.A. (2010). Integration Studies in the 2000s. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 1 (22). C. 58–73.

5. Baykov A.A. (2012). Comparative integration: Practice and models of integration in foreign Europe and Pacific Asia. Moskva: Aspekt Press. 256.

6. Beeson M. (2007). Regionalism and Globalization in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 336.

7. Borko Yu.A. (2003). From the European idea – to a united Europe. Moskva: Delovaya literatura. 464.

8. Borko Yu.A., Zagorskii A.V., Karaganov S.A. (1991). Common European home: what do we think about it? Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 231.

9. Börzel T.A., Cichowski R.A. (eds.). The State of the European Union, 6: Law, Politics, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 500.

10. Butorina O.V. (2007). Integration in the funky style. Rossiya v global’noi politike, (5). 106–121.

11. Crouch C. (1993). Towards Greater Europe? A Continent Without an Iron Curtain. Oxford: Blackwell Publ. 174.

12. Dent Chr. M. (2008). East Asian Regionalism. London; New York: Routledge. 334.

13. Dieter H. (2006). Report on East Asian integration: opportunities and obstacles for enhanced economic co-operation. Notre Europe Studies and Research Paper, (47). 149.

14. Elena E. А., Katzenstein P. (2003). European Enlargement and Institutional Hypocrisy. Börzel T.A., Cichowski R.A. (eds.). The State of the European Union, 6: Law, Politics, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 269–290.

15. «European idea»: from utopia to reality. (1998). Borko Yu.A. (ed.). Looking to the 21st century: the European Union and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Moskva: Interdialekt. 15–51.

16. Fawcett L., Hurell A. (1995). Regionalism in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 360.

17. Frost E. (2008). Asia’s New Regionalism. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 293.

18. Gamble A., Payne A. (eds). (1996). Regionalism and World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 296.

19. Hettne B. (2006). Beyond the New Regionalism. New Political Economy, 10 (4). 543–571. DOI: 10.1080/13563460500344484

20. Hettne B., Inotai A., Sunkel O. (eds.). (1999). Globalism and the New Regionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 308.

21. Hettne B., Söderbaum F. (1999). The New Regionalism Approach. Politiea, (3). 6–21.

22. Hettne B., Soderbaum F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3). 457–474. DOI: 10.1080/713687778

23. Katzenstein P.J. (2000). Regionalism and Asia. New Political Economy, (3). 335–368. DOI: 10.1080/713687777

24. Katzenstein P.J. (2002). Area Studies, Regional Studies, and International Relations.The Journal of East Asian Studies. 2(1). P. 127–138.

25. Katzenstein P.J. (2005). World of Regions. Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 320.

26. Khrustalev M.A. (2008). Analysis of international situations and political expertise. Moskva: NOFMO. 231.

27. King P., Bosco A. (eds.). (1991). A constitution for Europe: a Comparative Study of Federal Constitutions and Plans for the United States of Europe. London: Lothian Foundation Press. 380 p.

28. Kolodziej E. (1974). French International Policy Under de Gaulle and Pompidou: The Politics of Grandeur. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 618.

29. Langhammer R.J. (1999). Regional Integration APEC style: Lessons from integration EU Style. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, (16). 1–17.

30. Lawrence R.Z. (1996). Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration. Cambridge: Brookings Institution Press. 192.

31. Lebedeva M. (2003). New transnational actors and a change in the political system of the world. Kosmopolis, (3). 28–38.

32. Litsareva E.Yu. (2004). Economic integration on the European continent and in the AsiaPacific region in the second half of the twentieth century. Tomsk: TGU. 222.

33. Majorlin R. (1989). Architect of European Unity: Memoirs, 1911–1986. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. 457.

34. Manykin A.S. (ed.). (2010). Models of regional integration: past and present. Moskva: Albee-Print. 628.

35. Milner H. (1992). International theories of co-operation among nations: strengths and weaknesses. World Politics, (44). 466–496.

36. Molchanov N. (1957). About the hype around the common market. Novoe vremya, (5). 6–9

37. Schmitter P.C. (1969). Three Neo-Functional Hypotheses about International Integration. International Organization, (1). 161–166.

38. Shakleina T.A. (2013). Phenomenon and parameters of Great Power in the world politics of the 21st century. Shakleina T.A., Baykov A.A. (eds.). Megatrends: The main trajectories of evolution and world order in the 21st century. Moskva: Aspekt Press. 283–298.

39. Shishkov Yu.V. (2001). Integration processes on the threshold of the XXI century. Why are CIS countries not integrated? Moskva: III tysyacheletie. 480.

40. Solingen E. (1998). Regional Orders at Century’s Dawn. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 352.

41. Solingen E. (2013). Comparative Regionalism: Economics and Security. N.Y.: Routledge. 304.

42. Tinberbergen J. (1952). On the Theory of Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 80.

43. Voskresenskii A.D. (2006). “Greater East Asia”: world politics and energy security. Moskva: KomKniga. 128.

44. Wallace W. (1994). Regional Integration: The West European Experience. Wessington DC: The Brookings Institution. 178.


Review

For citations:


Baykov A.A. Economic Regionalism as a Planetary Phenomenon. Theory And Methodology of Comparison. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017;10(4):38-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-4-38-53

Views: 1854


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)