Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Desecularization of the World Community as Tension Source in the International Relations and World Politics

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-4-30-45

Abstract

Article is devoted to a role of world religions in the modern international relations and world politics. The phenomenon of world religious revival, his connection with globalization processes, formation of the multi-polar, polycivilization world is investigated. A research objective is the analysis of tendencies of a desecularization of the world community, the reasons and possible consequences of this process in global measurement. Article includes Introduction, three analytical sections and the Conclusion. In Introduction the phenomenon of world religious revival and approaches to his studying is presented. It is asked about a desecularization of the world community as a possible subject of the new direction of the international political researches – the international religious studies. The thesis about crisis of secular bases of modern political system of the world is proved in the first section. Revision of bases of a world order and standards of belonging to the world community from positions of the reviving religious fundamentalism, the cultural and political and social and economic bases of this process are considered. In the second section the role in a desecularization of the world community of political Islam (Islamism) is analyzed. It is noted that the greatest danger of politicization of Islam consists in emergence of difficult surmountable civilization break in the world community between the Western world (still confident in universality of the values) and the world of Islam. In the third section the possibilities of prevention of disintegration of the existing system of the international relations and collision of the cultural worlds are considered. The main attention is paid to processes of a global political institutionalization of such dialogue and its justification in the concept of global ethics – purposeful coordination and gradual connection of the basic moral and ethical values concluded in great religious and cultural traditions of the world. In the final section of article the conclusion is drawn that process of an institutionalization of civilization dialogue (civilization communication) it isn’t finished yet and didn’t become irreversible.

About the Author

I. V. SLEDZEVSKIY
FGBUN Institute for African Studies Africa of RAS
Russian Federation

DSc in History, Head of the Center of the Civilization and Regional Researches; Professor, Russian State Humanitarian University.

Address: 30/1, Spiridonovka St., Moscow, 123001, Russian Federation.



References

1. Aboulmagd A.K., Arizpe L., Ashrawi H., Cardoso R. (2002) Preodolevaya bar’ery. Dialog mezhdu tsivilizatsiyami [Crossing the Divide. Dialogue among Civilizations], Moscow: Logos.

2. Andreeva L.A. (2017) Fenomen «Yuzhnogo khristianstva» v Tropicheskoj Afrike v XXI veke: kharakternye cherty i tendentsii tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya [“The Southern Christianity” in Tropical Africa in the XXI Century: Characteristic Features and Tendencies of Civilization Development]. Tsivilizatsionnye al’ternativy Afriki. T. II. [Civilization Alternatives of Africa. Vol. II], Moscow: Institute for African Studies, RAS, pp. 129–145.

3. Berger M. (2010) Religion and Islam in Contemporary International Relations, Нague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.

4. Berger P. (1999) The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Washington Ethic and Public Policy Center.

5. Berger P.L. (2004) Vvedenie. Kul’turnaya dinamika globalizatsii [Introduction. Cultural Dynamics of Globalization]. Mnogolikaya globalizatsiya. Kul’turnoe raznoobrazie v sovremennom mire [Many Globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the Contemporary World] (eds. Berger P.L., Huntington S.P.), Moscow: Aspekt Press, pp. 8–26.

6. Bibler V.S. (1991) Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kul’tury: dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat’ pervyj vek [From Scientific Doctrines – to Culture Logic: Two Philosophical Introductions to the XXI Century], Moscow: Publishing house of political literature.

7. Borishpolets K.P. (2008) Za chto boremsya? [What We Fight for?]. «Privatizatsiya» mirovoj politiki: lokal’nye dejstviya – global’nye rezul’taty [“Privatization” of World Politics: Local Actions – Global Results] (ed. Lebedeva M.M.), Moscow: Moscow State Institute of International Relations, pp. 190–208.

8. Davydov V.M. (2010) Al’yans tsivilizatsij – istoricheskij imperative [Alliance of Civilizations – a Historical Imperative]. «Al’yans tsivilizatsij» (trudnyj dialog v usloviyakh globalizatsii). Sbornik materialov «kruglogo stola» [“Alliance of Civilizations” (Difficult Dialogue in the Conditions of Globalization). Collection of Materials of “a Round Table”], Moscow: Institute of Latin America, RAS, pp. 13–18.

9. Dawson S. (2013) The Religious Resurgence and International Relations Theory. Religious Studies Review, no 39, pp. 201– 221.

10. Fox J. (2001) Religion as an Overlooked Element of International Relations. International Studies Review, vol. 3, no 3, pp. 53–73.

11. Gong G.W. (1984) The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

12. Gorski P.S. (2012) The Post-secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society, N.Y.: Social Science Research Council.

13. Haynes J. (2012) Religion, Politics, and International Relations: Change and Continuity. Global Policy, no 3, pp. 251–252.

14. Huntington S. (2003) Stolknovenie tsivilizatsij [The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order], Moscow: AST.

15. Hurd E.Sh. (2009) The Politics of Secularism in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

16. Hurd E.Sh. (2015) Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

17. Ignatenko A.A. (2004) Islam i politika [Islam and Policy], Moscow: Institute of religion and policy.

18. Ignatenko A.A (2007) Islam v XXI veke: glavnye napravleniya issledovanij [Islam in the XXI Century: Main Directions of Researches]. Politiya. Аnaliz. Khronika. Prognoz, no 4, pp. 7–34.

19. Kasatkin P.I. (2010) O roli religioznykh aktorov v sovremennykh mirovykh politicheskikh protsessakh [About a Role of Religious Actors in Modern World Political Processes]. The Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij – Universiteta, no 1, pp. 257– 261.

20. Koval’skij N.A. (2000) Religioznyj faktor: problemy vliyaniya na mirovuyu politiku [Religious Factor: Problems of Influence on World Politics]. Religiya i politika na rubezhe dvukh tysyacheletij [Religion and Politics at the Turn of Two Millennia], Moscow: Ekslibris-Press, pp. 5–11.

21. Landa R.G. (2005) Politicheskij islam: predvaritel’nye itogi [Political Islam: Preliminary Results], Moscow: Institute of the Middle East.

22. Malashenko A.V. (2006) Islamskaya al’ternativa i islamistskij proekt [Islamic Alternative and Islamic Project], Moscow: Whole world.

23. Malashenko A.V. (2007) Islam dlya Rossii [Islam for Russia], Moscow: ROSSPEN.

24. Mchedlova M.M. (2011) Religiya i politika: vozmozhnye interpretatsii novykh realij [Religion and Policy: Possible Interpretations of New Realities]. Tsennosti i smysly, no 3, pp. 70–79.

25. Mirskij G.I. (2002) «Politicheskij islam» i zapadnoe obshchestvo [“Political Islam” and Western Society]. Polis, no 1, pp. 78–86.

26. Mirskij G.I. (2010) Islam: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Islam: History and Present]. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya, no 1, pp. 3–20.

27. Mishuchkov А.А. (2015) Strategiya musul’manskogo proekta dialoga tsivilizatsij [Strategy of the Muslim Project of Dialogue of Civilizations]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no 8, pp. 194–200.

28. Mitrofanova А.V. (2008) Religioznyj faktor v mirovoj politike i problema «tsivilizatsij» [Religious Factor in World Politics and a Problem of “Civilizations”]. Vek globalizatsii, no 1, pp. 109–119.

29. Naumkin V.V. (2009) Islam kak «kollektivnyj igrok» [Islam as “the Collective Player”]. Sovremennaya mirovaya politika: Prikladnoj analiz [Modern World Politics: Applied Analysis] (ed. Bogaturov А.D.), Moscow: Aspect Press, pp. 438–458.

30. Papkova I.А. (2010) Religiya i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: sostoyanie distsipliny v SShA [Religion and International Relations: a Condition of Discipline in the USA]. Politiya. Аnaliz. Khronika. Prognoz, no 1, pp. 112–117.

31. Procter J.H. (1965) Islam and International Relation, New York: Frederick A. Praeger.

32. Rezolyutsiya General’noj Аssamblei OON «Global’naya povestka dnya dlya dialoga mezhdu tsivilizatsiyami» (2012) [The Resolution of the United Nations General Assembly “The Global Agenda for Dialogue between Civilizations”]. Partnerstvo tsivilizatsij, no 1, pp. 130–135.

33. Sandal N.A., Fox J. (2013) Religion in International Relations Theory: Interactions and Possibilities, N.Y.: Routledge.

34. Semedov S.А. (2009) Islam v politike: ideologiya i praktika [Islam in Policy: Ideology and Practice], Moscow: Ekon-Inform.

35. Snyder J.L. (2011) Religion and International Relations Theory, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.

36. Stepanova E.A. (2012) Vera i tolerantnost` [Belief and Tolerance]. Religiya v menyayushhemsya mire [Religion in the Changing World] (eds. Shakhnovich M.M., Chumakova T.V., Stetskevich M.S., Teryukova E.А.), St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the St. Petersburg University, pp. 26–43.

37. Toynbee A.J. (1995) Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii. Postizhenie istorii. Mir i Zapad [Civilization on Trial], Moscow: Progress; St. Petersburg: Culture.

38. Vershinina V.Yu. (2013) Religioznyj faktor mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij v XXI veke [Religious Factor of the International Relations in the XXI Century]. Аktual’nye problemy sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij, no 1, pp. 6–11.

39. Yakovlev A.I. (2013) Religiozny`j faktor v mirovoj politike v e`pokhu globalizatsii: ot sekulyarizatsii k fundamentalizmu [The Religious Factor in World Politics during a Globalization Era: from Secularization to Fundamentalism]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, no 4, pp. 4–38.

40. Yakovlev P.P. (2010) Stolknovenie ili al`yans tsivilizatsij? Novy`e vy`zovy` mezhdunarodnomu soobshchestvu [Collision or Alliance of Civilizations? New Calls to the International Community]. «Al’yans tsivilizatsij» (trudnyj dialog v usloviyakh globalizatsii). Sbornik materialov «kruglogo stola» [“Alliance of Civilizations” (Difficult Dialogue in the Conditions of Globalization). Collection of Materials of “a Round Table”], Moscow: Institute of Latin America, RAS, pp. 19– 42.

41. Zhdanov N.V. (1991) Islamskaya kontseptsiya miroporyadka [Islamic Concept of World Order], Moscow: International Relations.


Review

For citations:


SLEDZEVSKIY I.V. Desecularization of the World Community as Tension Source in the International Relations and World Politics. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2018;11(4):30-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-4-30-45

Views: 1169


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)