Investment Fragmentation in the Context of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. and China’s Positions (2009–2023)

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an important source of economic growth and technology transfer; however, amid rising geopolitical tensions, it is increasingly becoming both an object of confrontation and an instrument of influence in international relations. Under these conditions, geopolitical competition contributes to the fragmentation of FDI, manifested in several interrelated trends, including a reduction in the number of external economic partners, shifts in the strategies of major investors, and the relocation of production facilities to friendly jurisdictions. This article examines one dimension of investment fragmentation – the dynamics of U. S. and Chinese outward FDI in 2009–2023 in the region defined by the U. S. Indo-Pacific Strategy as a zone of strategic competition with China. The analysis reveals a heterogeneous regional investment landscape, encompassing both countries dominated by U. S. investment and those where Chinese capital prevails. While China significantly strengthened its global investment position in 2009–2023, its presence in the Indo-Pacific region does not translate into dominance. In 2018–2024, a redistribution of investment flows became more pronounced: the United States strengthened its positions in India, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand, whereas China prevailed in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. At the same time, neither the United States nor China holds overwhelming investment dominance in the region, and their combined presence in many countries remains below the global average.

1. Ekonomicheskoye razvitiye… (2024). Izotov D.A. (ed.). Economic Development of North-East Asian Countries in the Context of Global Challenges. Khabarovsk: ECRIN FEB RAS, 390 pp. (in Russian).

2. Fedorovsky A.N. (2024). The Indo‑Pacific Region Between the Challenges of Confrontation and Opportunities for Interaction. World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 5–16 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131‑2227‑2024‑68‑10‑5‑16.

3. Geoeconomic Fragmentation… (2023). Alvarez J.A. et. al. Geoeconomic Fragmentation and Commodity Markets (2023). IMF Working Papers, no. 201, pp. 1–45. DOI: 10.5089/9798400252426.001.

4. Guo S. (2024). Observations & Thoughts on the Transformation of Supply Chains in East Asia & Their Reconstruction. Japan Spotlight. September/October, pp. 52–55. Available at: https://www.jef.or.jp/journal/pdf/257th_PEAPP.pdf, accessed 21.07.2025.

5. IMF (2023). World Economic Outlook. A Rocky Recovery. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, April. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2023/04/11/world-economic-outlook-april-2023, accessed 21.10.2025.

6. Kheyfets B.A. (2024). Will Contemporary Geopolitical Fragmentation Become a Long-term Trend of New Regionalization of the Global Economic Space? Moscow: IЕ RAS, 110 pр. (In Russian).

7. Konkurentsiya… (2024). Degterev D.A. (ed.). Competition Between the United States and China: Opportunities for Russia. Moscow: Aspect Press, 300 pp. (in Russian).

8. Kuznetsov A.V. (2025). The Impact of Deglobalization on the Fragmentation of the World Economy. World Economy and World Finance. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 5–13. DOI: 10.24412/2949‑6454‑2025‑0115.

9. Leksyutina Ya.V. (2024) The U.S. Response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture. No. 11(659), pp. 7–24 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S2686673024110011.

10. Loktionov V.I. (2025). Fragmentation of Global Social Capital. World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 5–14 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131‑2227‑2025‑69‑7‑5‑14.

11. Mezhdunarodnaya politekonomiya… (2023). Grigoryevsky V.V. et al. International Political Economy of ICT Industry. World Economy and International Relations Vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 5–19 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131‑2227‑2023‑67‑3‑5‑19.

12. Novaya Real’nost’ (2023). Mikheev V.V., Lomanov A.V., Shvydko V.G. (eds.). The New Reality of the Indo-Pacific Space. Moscow: IMEMO, 155 pp. Available at: https:// www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2023/Mikheev-Monograph2023.pdf, accessed: 05.12.2025.

13. Pavlínek P. (2023). Geopolitical Decoupling in Global Production Networks. Economic Geography. Vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 138–169. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2023.2281175.

14. Pestsov S.K. (2022). Indo-Pacific: Geopolitics versus Geoeconomics. Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography FEB RAS. Vol. 38, pp. 65–81 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2658-5960-2022-38-65-81.

15. Pestsov S.K. (2025). Indo-Pacific versus Asia-Pacific: A Debate on the Prospects of Asian Regionalism. Russia and the Asia-Pacific. No. 2(128), pp. 8–26 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/1026-8804-2025-2-8-26.

16. Ramich M.S., Piskunov D.A., Kitaev I.V. (2022). Technological Rivalry between the US and China in Southeast Asia: Network Analysis. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. Vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 131–151 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31249/kgt/2022.06.07.

17. Schulze T., Xin W. (2025). Demystifying Trade Patterns in a Fragmenting World. IMF Working Papers. No. 129, pp. 1–38. DOI: 10.5089/9798229011679.001.

18. Tan J. (2024). How Widespread is FDI Fragmentation? IMF Working Papers. No. 179, pp. 1–42. DOI: 10.5089/9798400281211.001.

19. Tsvetkova N.N. (2024). Fragmentation of World Economy and Countries of Asia and Africa. Vostok (Oriens). No. 5, pp. 44–57 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31696/S086919080032076‑0.

20. Volodin A.G. (2025). South and Southeast Asia in the Emerging Polycentric World: Political and Economic Crossroads. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 50–71 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31249/kgt/2025.01.04.

21. Voskressenski A.D. (2021). The New World Architectonics, Macroregional Transformations of Potentially Global Character and the Significance of Chinese Experience. Comparative Politics. No. 3, pp. 5–20 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2221‑3279‑2021‑10024.

22. UNCTAD (2024). World Investment Report 2024. Investment Facilitation and Digital Government. Geneva: United Nations, xvi + 165 pp. Available at: https:// unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2024, accessed 21.10.2025).

23. UNCTAD (2025). World Investment Report 2025: International Investment in the Digital Economy. Geneva: United Nations, xii + 261 pp. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2025_en.pdf, accessed 21.10.2025.