Transformation of the Competitive Landscape in the East Asian Port System
https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2026.01.05
Abstract
This article analyzes the fundamental changes in the competitive landscape of the East Asian Port System (EAPS), which handles over 40% of the global container cargo turnover. The study aims to identify the key factors driving the transformation of the regional port hierarchy amidst global economic instability, geopolitical tensions, and the technological revolution in logistics. The research undertakes a retrospective analysis of the evolving balance of power within the EAPS, a comparative assessment of the logistics efficiency of the region’s key economies based on the World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index (LPI) for 2007–2023, and an examination of the role of geo-economic strategies, digitalization, and integration processes in reshaping inter-port competition. The paper’s structure encompasses an analysis of historical dynamics, contemporary differentiation in logistics development, the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative and the response strategies of regional powers, as well as the influence of digital platforms and regional trade agreements. The main findings indicate a paradigm shift in competition: traditional rivalry based on tariffs and capacity is giving way to a strategic struggle for integration into global supply chains. China emerges as the primary beneficiary of this transformation, as its ports, through investment expansion and digitalization, consolidate their status as global hubs. Concurrently, ports in Japan and ASEAN countries face the risk of marginalization, thereby cementing a new, more rigid multi-tiered hierarchy in the region.
About the Author
N. K. SemenovaRussian Federation
Nelli K. Semenova, PhD (Political Sciences), Leading Researcher
Nakhimovsky Avenue, 32, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Akimov A.V. (2024). Comprehensive Regional Economic Partnership: Regulation of Foreign Trade. International Trade and Trade Policy. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5–19 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2024-1-5-19.
2. Chamberlin E.H. (1933). The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 213 pp.
3. Chen Peiran, Wang Chengjin, Liu Weidong (2019). Spatial Evolution of China’s Overseas Port Investment Pattern and Its Mechanism. Progress in Geography. Vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 973–987 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.07.003.
4. Chen Yiwen (2019). Design and Implementation of a Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Management System. Contemporary Computers. No. 3, pp. 86–90 (in Chinese).
5. Franke U., Roos U. (2024). Actor-Structure Problem in Public Policy. In: van Gerven M., Rothmayr Allison C., Schubert K. (eds). Encyclopedia of Public Policy. Cham: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_109-1.
6. Hettne B., Inotai A. (1994). The New Regionalism Implications for Global development and International Security. Helsinki: WIDER. 92 pp. DOI: 10.22004/AG.ECON.295305.
7. Hettne B. (1996). Globalization, the New Regionalism and East Asia. In: Selected Papers Delivered at the United Nations University Global Seminar ‘96 Shonan Session. Tokyo: UNU, pp. 4–19.
8. Identifying… (2025). Spencer M.D., Christiansen E., Pires S.F., Tsai C.-H., Gondhali U., Petrossian G. Identifying and explaining the distribution of Chinese-Affiliated Ports around the world: A case control design. Ocean & Coastal Management. No. 269, article 107819. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107819.
9. Issledovaniye evolutsii… (2017). Nguen Thiyen, Zhang Jin, Li Guoqi, Cui Yi. The Evolving Regularity of ASEAN Container Port System. Human Geography. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 108–114 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.04.015.
10. Katada S.N. (2020). Japan’s New Regional Reality: Geoeconomic Strategy in the Asia-Pacific. New York: Columbia University Press, xvi + 321 pp. DOI: 10.7312/kata19072.
11. Leontiev V.V. (1990). Economic Essays: Theories, Research, Facts and Policy. Moscow: Politizdat, 414 pp. (in Russian)
12. Notteboom T., Pallis A., Rodrigue J.-P. (2022). Port Economics, Management and Policy. New York: Routledge. 690 pp.
13. Nozdrev S.V. (2023). Global Value Chains in Asia at the New Stage of International Competition. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin. No. 2, pp. 44–60 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2072-8042-2025-2-44-60.
14. Paramonov O.G. (2018). Foreign policy aspect of transport and logistics processes in East Asia. International Analytics. No. 4 (26), pp. 47–55 (in Russian).
15. Research on… (2025). Quan Dai, Fulati Y., Yuhao Ge, Yulin Cao. Research on Performance Evaluation of Chinese Ports in the «Belt and Road» Region. Proceedings of the 2025 10th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2025). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, pp. 769–775. DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-702-1_78.
16. Rothschild R. (1987). The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: E.H. Chamberlin’s Influence on Industrial Organisation Theory over Sixty Years. Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 34–54. DOI: 10.1108/eb002641.
17. Sea and Waterways… (2009). Zumerchik J., Danver S.L. (eds.). Seas and Waterways of the World. Encyclopedia of History, Uses, and Issues. Santa Barbara, CA: ABCCLIO, 800 pp.
18. Semenova N.K. (2023a). Overseas ports of China: evolution, geography, investment structure. Vostok (Oriens). No. 3, pp. 135–148 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S086919080025431-1.
19. Semenova N.K. (2023b). Ports of Vietnam: The Emergence of a New Leader? Vietnam Studies. Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 18–30 (in Russian). DOI: 10.54631/VS.2023.73-352575.
20. Semenova N.K. (2023c). Seaports of China: current state and development prospects. Moscow: IOS RAS, 472 pp. (in Russian).
21. Semenova N.K. (2023d). Taiwan’s ports: key infrastructure or an integration mechanism for reunification? Asia and Africa Today. No. 3, pp. 21–29 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S032150750025001.
22. Semenova N.K. (2024). Hong Kong port: the former and future leader of the port industry? Eastern Analytics. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 127–145. DOI: 10.31696/2227-5568-2024-01-127-145.
23. Smith A. (2025). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Simon & Brown, 482 pp.
24. Timofeev O.A. (2010). The state as an actor in modern science of international relations. Bulletin of Amur State University. Series: Humanities. No. 48, pp. 11–14 (in Russian).
25. Timonina I.L. (2023). Japan in Global Economy: Realities and Forecasts of the XXI Century. World and National Economy. No. 1 (61), pp. 74–105 (in Russian).
26. Voronenko A.K., Smirnov S.M., Kholosha M.V. (2024). Integration processes in the transport system of Northeast Asia: realities and forecasts. Pacific Geography. No. 1, pp. 34–45 (in Russian). DOI: 10.35735/26870509_2024_17_3.
27. Wendt A. (2025). The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. Trans. Ahmed Qassem Hussein. Siyasat Arabiya. Vol. 13, no. 72, pp. 103–130. DOI: 10.31430/HORD8558.
28. Wu Chongbo, Wang Di (2020). The development of the Philippine marine economy and its cooperation with China and Japan. Journal of Shantou University: Humanities and Social Sciences Edition. Vol. 36, no. 2, p. 12 (in Chinese). DOI: CNKI:SUN:RWST.0.2020-02-010.
29. Xu Feng, Guo Chaoxian (2023). Ten Years of Achievements and Future Prospects of the Digital Silk Road. China Development Review. No. Z1, pp. 41–47 (in Chinese).
30. Yu Hang, Gong Yu, Liu Jun (2023). A systematic literature review on port competitiveness. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. Vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 720–744. DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2023.2187355.
31. Zhou T. (2025). The US – China Trade War: Economic Consequences and Risks to Global Stability. Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. No. 9 (127), pp. 180–185. DOI: 10.24412/2411-0450-2025-9-180-185 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Semenova N.K. Transformation of the Competitive Landscape in the East Asian Port System. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2026;19(1):73-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2026.01.05
JATS XML




























