Self-realization vs. Family: The Generation Z Dilemma in the Context of Demographic Policy (The Case of Russian Students)

The article focuses on socio-psychological factors that hinder family formation and childbearing practices among young people, including students. The search for solutions to the challenges associated with the implementation of modern Russia’s demographic policy in the youth and student environment is carried out using an agent-structural model from the standpoint of social constructivism. Based on a stratified sampling survey of undergraduate and graduate students (n = 304) from Moscow, Vladivostok, Nizhny Novgorod, St. Petersburg, Surgut, and Cheboksary, it is concluded that the generational factor is of paramount importance in planning and creating a family, which is currently overlooked by demographic policy planners. The socio-economic tools currently proposed and applied serve only as an intermediate link in shaping young people’s sense of confidence in the future, which is in fact a prerequisite for starting a family. Uncertainty about the future and concerns regarding the well-being of potential children are significant factors influencing respondents’ reproductive intentions. The study puts forward proposals that could transform Generation Z’s underlying anxiety and reframe their fear of an uncertain future, using it as an emotional trigger to reset decision-making mechanisms. This publication contributes to the development of the current demographic agenda.

1. Adolescent Media Use… (2022). Bickham D.S. et al. Adolescent Media Use: Attitudes, Effects, and Online Experiences. Boston, MA: Boston Children’s Hospital Digital Wellness Lab, 39 pp. Available at: https://digitalwellnesslab.org/pulse-surveys/adolescent-media-use-attitudes-effects-and-online-experiences/, accessed 10.05.2024.

2. Aisner L.Yu., Naumov O.D. (2020). Digital Environment as a Social Space. In: Science and Education: Experience, Problems, Development Prospects. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, pp. 319–321 (in Russian).

3. Ardel’janova Ja.A., Saidov B.Sh. (2018). Factors and conditions of infantilization of modern youth. Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija. No. 4, pp. 32–36 (in Russian).

4. Baudrillard J. (2017). The Spirit of Terrorism. The Gulf War Did Not Take Place. Moscow: Ripol Klassik, 224 pp. (transl. into Russian).

5. Bourdieu P. (1993). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Thesis. Issue 2, pp. 137– 150 (in Russian).

6. Bourdieu P. (1998). Structure, Habitus, Practice. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–59 (in Russian).

7. Bourdieu P., Passeron J.C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. London, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, 254 pp. (transl. into English).

8. Dimock M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–7.

9. Giddens A. (1979). Agency, Structure. In: Central Problems in Social Theory. Contemporary Social Theory. London: Palgrave, pp. 49–95. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4_3.

10. Gorbunova N.V. (2021). Transformation of family values of Russian youth in modern society. In: Rostovskaya T.K. (ed.). Socio-demographic Potential of Russian Youth: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Yalta, April 22–24, 2021). Moscow: FNISC RAS, p. 45.

11. Lippmann W. (2017). Public Opinion. S. l.: Routledge, 352 pp.

12. Malinova O. (2014). Spiritual Bonds. Rossiya v global’noy politike. Vol. 12, no. 5, p. 113–122 (in Russian).

13. Pariser E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: The Penguin Press, 294 pp.

14. Piskarev P.M. (2019). The Person of Metamodernity. Aktual’nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya. No. 3–4 (52), pp. 48–63 (in Russian).

15. Radaev V.V. (2020). The Millennial Generation Split: Historical and Empirical Justification (Part One). Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal. No. 3, pp. 30–63 (in Russian).

16. Siunturenko O.V. (2015). Digital Environment: Trends and Risks of Development. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoy raboty. No. 2, pp. 1-7 (in Russian).

17. Strelets I.E., Mukhortov D.S., Markova Ju.S. (2024). The Role of the University Educational Environment in the Formation of Family Values: An Assessment of Russian Students. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 586–599 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2024-24-3-586-599.

18. Strelets I.E., Mukhortov D.S., Zakharova E.A. (2024). On the role of the digital student environment in solving the demographic problem of modern Russia. In: Collection of scientific papers of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference “Study of Russian statehood as a basis for patriotic education of youth”, April 25–26, 2024. Moscow: Moscow Financial and Industrial University “Synergy”, pp. 114 119 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/978-5-4257-0668-3-2024-1-168.

19. Stulova E. (2020). Four Horsemen of the Information Apocalypse. Yekaterinburg: Lazur’, 112 pp. (in Russian).

20. Sumskaia A.S., Sumskoi P.F. (2019). Multimedia Storytelling as a Tool for the Formation of “Spiritual Bonds” of Russian Youth. In: Journalistic Text in the New Technological Environment: Achievements and Problems. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University, pp. 320–324 (in Russian).

21. Trotsuk I.V., Paramonova A.D. (2016). “Status” of the family institution in modern society and family and marriage values of youth. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Sociologija. No. 3, pp. 542–558 (in Russian).

22. Twenge J.M. (2023). Generations: The Real Differences Between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents – and What They Mean for America’s Future. S. l.: Simon and Schuster, 560 pp.

23. Usovskaya E.A. (2018). Socio-Cultural Conditions for the Birth of Postmodernism. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vostokovedenie”. No. 8 (41), part 2 (in Russian).

24. Usovskaya E.A. (2022). The Other in the Postmodern Concept of “Difference” by Jacques Derrida. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. No. 47, pp. 132–138 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17223/22220836/47/11.

25. Vermeulen T., van den Akker R. (2010). Notes on Metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture. Vol. 2, issue 1, article 5677. DOI: 10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.

26. Wendt A.E. (1987). The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization. Vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 335–370. DOI: 10.1017/S002081830002751X.

27. Wilson T.D., Gilbert D.T. (2003). Affective Forecasting. Advances in Experimental Psychology. Vol. 35, pp. 345–411. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01006-2.

28. Jung K.G. (2019). Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Moscow: AST, 496 pp. (transl. into Russian).

29. Jung K.G. (2021). Relationships Between Ego and the Unconscious. Moscow: AST, 320 pp. (transl into Russian).