The Recentralization of Power: Examining the Political Ideologies of Russian Leaders.
https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.05.08
Abstract
In recent years, following the consistent logic of the three main political ideas of the country – the individual, society, and the state – Russia has begun to conduct research on the future political path of the country’s development under the influence of three main factors: feelings of separation, feelings of alienation, and concerns about security. This adjustment of direction can be summarized as a strategy of the «recentralization of power.» This strategy includes at least two parts: the recentralization of political power and the recentralization of political action, both of which cover international and domestic politics. The recentralization of political power means that the emphasis is no longer on decentralization and empowerment, but instead on centralized power and strict rules. The recentralization of political action means that the emphasis is no longer on competition and negotiation, but on common goals and unified actions. From the point of view of international politics, the recentralization of actions is mainly reflected in the evolution of the dynamics among great powers towards major power confrontations and the evolution of regional cooperation towards major power leadership. From the perspective of domestic policy, the recentralization of actions is predominantly reflected in the consolidation of decision-making processes and the synchronization of developmental progress, coupled with an intensification of political measures. The strategy of the «recentralization of power» signifies Russia’s profound adjustments to its systemic framework and policy implementation. These adjustments should not be perceived merely as short-term or temporary initiatives; rather, they must be interpreted at a higher level, within a broader historical and contextual framework, grounded in a deeper strate gic logic and shaped by the developmental experience of Russian leadership over the past three decades. The article provides a brief summary, as well as a vision of the future path of political development. The implementation of this strategy signifies not only that Russia has begun to reflect on its political history over the past century, but also that Russian politics has entered a new cycle.
About the Author
Fei HaitingChina
Fei HAITING, DSc in History, Assistant Professor of Research Center of Chinese Politics, School of Government, Leading Researcher at the Russian Research Center
Yi Heyuan Street 5, Haidian district, Beijing, 100871
Zhongshan Road (N), 3663, Shanghai, 200050
References
1. Ash T. (2023). Postimperial Empire: How the war in Ukraine is transforming Europe. Foreign Affairs. May/June. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/europe-war-russia-postimperial-empire, accessed 12.03.2024.
2. Balzer H. (2003). Managed Pluralism: Vladimir Putin’s Emerging Regime. Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 189– 227. DOI: 10.2747/1060-586X.19.3.189.
3. Dynkin A.A. (2023). Globalization is a thing of the past. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. November 27 (in Russian). Available at: https://rg.ru/2023/11/27/globalizaciia-ostalas-v-proshlom.html, accessed 12.03.2024.
4. Hale H. (2011). Hybrid Regimes: When Democracy and Autocracy Mix. In: Brown N. (ed.). Dynamics of Democratization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 23–45.
5. Jiang Yi, Wen Longjie (2020). Russian Diplomacy: Historical Heritage and Ideological Inheritance. Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies. No. 6, pp. 1–16 (in Chinese).
6. Kortunov A.V. (2020). The Crisis of the World Order and the Global South: A Report by the Russian International Affairs Council No. 59. Moscow: RIAC, 48 pp. (in Russian).
7. Liu Lingqi, Guan Haiting (2014). On “Putinism” in Russia’s State Transformation: From the Perspective of State Governance. Northeast Asia Forum. No. 5, pp. 99–108. DOI: 10.13654/j.cnki.naf.2014.05.009.
8. Pang Dapeng (2016). Review of Putinism. Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies. No. 1, pp. 17–35 (in Chinese).
9. Shaipov A., Shaipova Y. (2023). Change the way we study Russia. Foreign Policy. February 11. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/02/11/russia-studies-war-ukraine-decolonize-imperialism-western-academics-soviet-empire-eurasia-eastern-europe-university/, accessed 12.03.2024.
10. Yang Cheng (2008). The Theoretical Dimension of “Second Transformation” and the Diversity of Transformation in Original Socialist Countries: Taking the Institutional Transformation of Russia during Putin’s Era as an Example. Russian Studies. No. 4, pp. 12–26 (in Chinese).
11. Zhao Huasheng (2021). The Pendulum of History: International Political Changes in the 30 Years since the Disintegration of the Soviet Union. Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies. No. 6, pp. 1-15 (in Chinese).
12. Zimmerman W. (2016) Ruling Russia: Authoritarianism from the Revolution to Putin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 344 pp.
Review
For citations:
Haiting F. The Recentralization of Power: Examining the Political Ideologies of Russian Leaders. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2024;17(5):150-171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.05.08