Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Revisiting ‘Old Questions’: Perspectives amid Contemporary Digital Transformations

https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.05.02

Abstract

The aim of this work is to define fundamentally new, substantive answers to traditional questions that have challenged scientists for centuries within the context of contemporary digital transformations. The central research question focuses on the fundamental reinterpretation of “old” questions in a changed world. The paper explores W.R. Ashby’s law of requisite variety, the concept of the Panopticon by J. Bentham and M. Foucault, and Plato’s allegory of the cave, assessing their relevance and applicability to contemporary conditions of state and societal functioning in a new technological stage of digital development. This study demonstrates that digital technological transformations fail to generate fundamentally novel substantive frameworks for interpreting the processes occurring in critical spheres of state and societal dynamics. Instead, the enduring relevance of established classical theories, conceptual paradigms, systemic laws governing state administration, and foundational principles of interaction between the state and society remain evident. Traditional ideas about mass consciousness – its role in shaping behavioral patterns and the information and communication foundation for constructing worldviews and mass perceptions of reality – do not undergo fundamental changes within the context of digitalization. Rather, they align seamlessly with existing traditional concepts and approaches. The results of the study indicate that the substantive aspects of digital solutions to “old” questions largely correspond to existing traditional answers and solutions, which retain a high explanatory potential even in the contemporary era.

About the Author

S. V. Volodenkov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. VOLODENKOV, Dr. Sc. (Political Sciences), Professor of the Public Policy Department

Lomonosovsky Аvenue, 27, Building 4, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Ashby W.R. (1956). Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall, 295 pp.

2. Foucault M. (2022). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 384 pp. (in Russian).

3. Freud S. (2016). The Psychology of the Masses and Ego Analysis. Moscow: Publishing house “E”, 96 pp. (in Russian).

4. Hardt M., Negri A. (2004). Empire. Moscow: Praxis, 440 pp. (in Russian).

5. Gosudarstvennaya politika… (2024). Yakunin V.I. et al. Public policy as an object of contemporary scientific research. PREPRINTS.RU (in Russian). DOI: 10.24108/preprints-3113129.

6. Le Bon G. (2024). Psychology of Peoples and Masses. Moscow: АSТ, 320 pp. (in Russian).

7. Lippman W. (2004). Public Opinion. Moscow: Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation, 384 pp. (in Russian).

8. Luhmann N. (2005). The Reality of the Mass Media. Moscow: Praxis, 256 pp. (in Russian).

9. Marcuse H. (2002). One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Moscow: АSТ, 526 pp. (in Russian).

10. McLuhan M. (2007). Understanding Media: External Extensions of Man. Moscow: Hyperborea; Kuchkovo Pole, 464 pp. (in Russian).

11. Mironov V.V. (2019). Plato and the modern cave of big data. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies. Vol. 35, issue 1, pp. 4–24 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2019.101.

12. Nietzsche F. (2005). The Will to Power. An Experience of Revaluation of All Values. Moscow: Cultural Revolution, 880 pp. (in Russian).

13. Parenti M. (1990). Democracy for the Few. Moscow: Progress, 504 pp. (in Russian).

14. Pariser E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press, 294 pp.

15. Plato (2015). State. Moscow: Academic project, 398 pp. (in Russian).

16. Sunstein C.R. (2004). Democracy and filtering. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 57–59. DOI: 10.1145/1035134.1035166.

17. Thomas W.I. (1974). Sex and Society: Studies in the Social Psychology of Sex. (Reprint edition). New York: Arno Press, 325 pp.

18. Volodenkov S.V. (2020). One-dimensional society 3.0: from H. Marcuse to the digital world of the 21st century. Dialogue with Time. No. 71, pp. 49–56 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21267/AQUILO.2020.71.63587.

19. Volodenkov S.V. (2024). Digital actors and computational propaganda as tools for influencing mass consciousness in the context of global technological transformations. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. No. 2, pp. 47–70 (in Russian). DOI: 10.55959/MSU0868-4871-12-2024-2-2-47-70.

20. Volodenkov S.V., Artamonova Yu.D. (2020). Information capsules as a structural component of contemporary political internet communication. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. Vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 188–196 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/53/20.

21. Webster F. (2004). Theories of the Information Society. Moscow: Aspect Press, 400 pp. (in Russian).

22. Zuboff Sh. (2022). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 784 pp. (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Volodenkov S.V. Revisiting ‘Old Questions’: Perspectives amid Contemporary Digital Transformations. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2024;17(5):27-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2024.05.02

Views: 113


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)