The conceptualization of theoretical approaches to the study of political propaganda
Abstract
The article analyzes the theories and the models of the concept of political propaganda, which are offered by various researchers of the related to political science disciplinary fields, and attempts of conceptualization and elaboration of adequate theoretical approaches to the study of political propaganda.
About the Author
A. A. Porezkova
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Кочетков В. Социально-психологическая составляющая информационной войны / (Электронный ресурс) «Информационные войны» http://www.infwar.ru/article.php?num=22 (дата обращения: 18.05.2014).
2. Лившин A., Орлов И. Советское «пропагандистское государство» в годы II мировой войны: ресурсные ограничения и коммуникативные возможности // The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review. 2012. Vol. 39. P. 192-218.
3. Ньюман Л. Значение методологии: три основных подхода // Социологические исследования. 1999. № 4. С. 124-142.
4. Allyene M. Global Lies? Propaganda, the UN and World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. 262 p.
5. Berelson B. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1952. 220 p.
6. Bernays. E.L. Manipulating Public Opinion: The Why and The How. // American Journal of Sociology. 1928. Vol. 33. No. 6. P. 958-971.
7. Bernays. E.L. The engineering of consent. Norman,Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, 1955. 250 p.
8. Brent Bozell III. Obama's Picture-Perfect Propaganda / http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/l-brent-bozell-iii/obamas-picture-perfect-propaganda (дата обращения: 18.05.2014).
9. Chapman J. The Power of Propaganda // Journal of Contemporary History. 2000. Vol. 35(4). P. 679-688.
10. Cobb R.W., Elder C.D. The Politics of Agenda-Building: An Alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory. // The Journal of Politics. 1971. Vol. 33. No. 4. P. 892-915.
11. Deuttsch K. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. N.Y.: Free Press, 1966. 316 p.
12. Erbring L, Goldenberg E.N., Miller A.H. Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media // American Journal of Political Science. 1980. 24. P. 16-49.
13. Fowler J.A. A Synopsis and Analysis of the Thought and Writings of Jacques Ellul / http://www.christinyou.com/pages/ellul.html (дата обращения: 18.05.2014).
14. Franklin F. Social Impact of the Mass Media of Communication / Mass Media and Education. Fifty-Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Part II. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1954. P. 165-192.
15. Funkhouser, G.R. The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1973. 37. P. 62-75.
16. Gambrill E. Propaganda in the Helping Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 584 p.
17. Gerbner G. On Content Analysis and Critical Research in Mass Communication // Audio-Visual Communication Review. 1958. 2 (6). P. 85-108.
18. Handbook of Political theory / Gaus G., Kukathas C. London: SAGE, 2004. 448 p.
19. Hargrave J. Words Win Wars: Propaganda: The Mightiest Weapon of All. London: W. Gardner, Darton & co., ltd., 1940. 208 p.
20. Johnson J. Obama White House Photos Are Pure «Propaganda» / http://www.newser.com/story/179106/obama-white-house-photos-are-pure-propaganda.html (дата доступа: 18.05.2014).
21. Jowett G.S., O’Donnell V. Propaganda and Persuasion. Washington D.C.: SAGE Publications Inc., 2006. 396 p.
22. Iyengar P., Kinder D.R. Experimental Demonstrations of the «Not-So-Minimal» Consequences of Television News Programs // The American Political Science Reivew. 1983. 76 (4). P. 848-858.
23. Kaplan A. Content Analysis and the Theory of Signs // Philosophy of Science. 1943. 10. P. 230-247.
24. Kershaw I. The “Hitler Myth”: Image and Reality in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. 320 p.
25. Lasswell H.D., Lerner D., Pool I. The Comparative Study of Symbols. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1952. 87 p.
26. McCombs, M.E., Shaw D.L. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972. 36. P. 176-187.
27. McCombs, M.E., Shaw D.L. The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas // Journal of Communication. 1993. Vol. 43. No. 2. P. 58-67.
28. Milbank D. Obama’s photo policy smacks of propaganda / [Электронный ресурс] The Washington Post Opinions http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-obamas-white-house-takes-image-control-to-a-new-level/2013/11/26/13b95c20-56da-11e3-835d-e7173847c7cc_story.html (дата обращения: 18.05.2014).
29. Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics / Brants K., Voltmer K. Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 284 p.
30. Propaganda and mass persuasion: a historical encyclopedia, 1500 to the present / Cull N. J., Culbert D., Welch D. New York: ABC-Clio, 2003. 318 p.
31. Skinner Q. Visions of Politics in 3 vols. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 224 p.
32. Siegfried K. The Challenge of Qualitative Content Analysis // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1952. 16. P 631-41.
33. Starks H., Trinidad S.B. Choose your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory // Qualitative Health Research. 2007. 17. P 1372-1380.
34. Taylor P. British Propaganda in the Twentieth Century: Selling Democracy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999. 288 p.
35. Willcox D.R. Propaganda, the Press and conflict: The Gulf War and Kosovo. London and New York: Routledge, 2005. 210 p.
Review
For citations:
Porezkova A.A. The conceptualization of theoretical approaches to the study of political propaganda. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2015;8(2):19-33. (In Russ.)
Views:
917
Email this article 