On the Typologization of Sub-regional Forms of Cooperation in the European Union and the Role in International Processes in the Region
Abstract
Subregional cooperation of the countries of the European Union acquires special significance in the context of the formation of a new European reality. The emergence of new threats to security, difficulties in the internal processes of the EU stimulate individual states of the united Europe to group themselves into small associations to protect their own interests, which may not be a priority for Brussels. The article examines some of the subregional groups that exist within the EU: Benelux, the Nordic Council, the Visegrad Group, the Baltic Assembly, the Central European Initiative, the Weimar Triangle and the Slavkov interaction (Austerlitz format). The authors attempted to typologize subregional associations according to the principle of membership of Western European or Eastern European countries, including states of the former socialist camp. Such an ordering of the aggregate and a comparative analysis of subregional groups made it possible to study the degree of influence of this or that association on the processes in the European Union, as well as to trace new trends in integration processes. In the course of the study, the authors made a conclusion about the growing role of sub-regional groupings in the European space. At the same time, an increase in the number of small groups of states may indicate the intensification of localization processes in the EU policy, which will undoubtedly create difficulties for the development of integration processes and the implementation of a common European policy, which is advocated by Brussels and the leading states of the European Union.
About the Authors
V. V. TolkachevRussian Federation
Vitaliy V. Tolkachev, Candidate of Sciences (History), Associate Professor at World diplomacy and international law chair
Gagarina Avenue, 23, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950
A. A. Ashmarina
Russian Federation
Aleksandra A. Ashmarina, PhD student
Gagarina Avenue, 23, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950
References
1. Ashmarina A.A. (2021). Policy of the Nordic countries and the development of integration processes in the EU. Regiony mira: problemy istorii, kul’tury i politiki: Sbornik statej, no. 5, pp. 50–54 (in Russian).
2. Cottey A. (2009). Sub-regional Cooperation in Europe: An Assessment. Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers, no. 3, 24 p. Available at: https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/brigg_3-2009_andrew_ cottey.pdf, accessed 12.03.2021.
3. Grøn C., Wivel A. (2011). Maximizing Influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: From Small State Policy to Smart State Strategy. Journal of European Integration, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2010.546846.
4. Khan M. (2018). New ‘Hanseatic’ states stick together in EU big league. Financial Times, 27.11.2018. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/f0ee3348-f187-11e8-9623-d7f9881e729f, accessed 10.12.2021.
5. Rusakova M.Yu. (2018). Slavkov Cooperation. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, no. 6, pp. 36– 41 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran620183641.
6. Rusakova M.Yu. (2021). Poland and New Trends in Central European Regional Configuration. Contemporary Europe, no. 1, рр. 52–61 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15211/soveurope120215261.
7. Safonova E.A. (2018). The Visegrad Group: stages of formation and development. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya, no. 53, pp. 69–73 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17223/19988613/53/14.
8. Schoeller M. (2020). Preventing the eurozone budget: issue replacement and small state influence in EMU. Journal of European public policy, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1727–1747. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1795226.
9. Schulz D., Henokl T. (2020). New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation? Politics and governance, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 78–88. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3359.
10. Shishelina L.N. (2020). Visegrad Group in Light of Challenges 2020. Contemporary Europe, no. 5, pp. 89–98 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15211/soveurope520208998.
11. Shishelina L.N. (2021). Trimorie: postpandemicheskoe probuzhdenie. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, no. 4, pp. 24–29 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran420212429.
12. Tolkachev V.V., Semenov O.Yu. (2011). “Weimar triangle” and international relations in Europe: achievements and prospects. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, no. 5, pp. 260– 263 (in Russian).
13. Usiak J. (2020). Visegrad Group as institution for Central European cooperation: Ups and downs of small international organizations. Revista UNISCI, no. 54, pp. 9–28. DOI: 10.31439/UNISCI-95.
Review
For citations:
Tolkachev V.V., Ashmarina A.A. On the Typologization of Sub-regional Forms of Cooperation in the European Union and the Role in International Processes in the Region. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2022;15(3):166-182. (In Russ.)