QUAD and AUKUS and the Balance of Power in the Asia-Pacific Region: Prospects for Russia, China and ASEAN
https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2022.03.09
Abstract
Over the past few years the US-China rivalry has been the main reason for the key events in the Asia-Pacific region. Now this strategic confrontation is taking new forms. Various alliances and coalitions led by the United States are being created. This article analyzes the QUAD and AUKUS alliances and their impact on the balance of power in the region. Every action causes a reaction. China began to deepen relations with allied states after the creation of AUKUS and concluded a military agreement with the Solomon Islands. The ASEAN countries try to avoid being drawn into the confrontation between the US and China and attempt to diversify their foreign policy. For example, the first ever Russia-Indonesia naval exercises took place in December, 2021. Due to the aggravation of Russia’s relations with the Western countries, the Asian vector of foreign policy is currently of particular importance for Russia. It is obvious that the geostrategic and economic confrontation between China and the anti-Chinese coalition under the auspices of the United States is increasing rapidly. There is a good reason to believe that the political situation in the Asia-Pacific region will become more intense and less predictable in the coming years.
About the Author
E. S. MartynovaRussian Federation
Elena S. Martynova, Expert, Department of International Multilateral Cooperation and Integration
Kotelnicheskaya Embankment, 17, Moscow, 109240
References
1. Batyuk V.I. (2022). J. Biden Administration’s Policy on China. National Strategy Issues, no. 1 (70), pp. 10–30 (in Russian).
2. Bratersky M.V., Kutyrev G.I. (2019). Russia and the Asia-Pacific region: a second chance for integration into the international system? New international relations in Greater Eurasia. Russian strategy in changing geopolitical dynamics. Moscow : Publishing house «Ves’ Mir», pp. 105–127 (in Russian).
3. Fedorovsky A.N. (2019). Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 6–25 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-1-6-25.
4. Garin A.А. Pale S.E. (2021). The Place of the Solomon Islands and Kiribati in China’s Geopolitical Thinking. YugoVostochnaya Aziya: aktual’nyye problemy razvitiya, vol. III, no. 3 (52), pp. 234–253 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31696/2072-8271-2021-3-3-52-234-253.
5. Goodman M.P., Arasasingha A. (2022). Regional Perspectives on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. CSIS Briefs, April 11. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/regional-perspectivesindo-pacific-economic-framework, accessed 06.06.2022.
6. Khudaikulova A.V., Ramich M.S. (2020). “Quad 2.0”: A Quadruple Dialogue to Counterbalance the PRC in the Indo-Pacific Enterprise. Polis. Political studies, no. 3, pp. 23–43 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.03.03.
7. Kuprijanov A.V. (2021). QUAD and the security of the Indo-Pacific region. SIPRI Yearbook 2020 “Arms, disarmament and international security” with a Special Supplement of the IMEMO RAS, Moscow : IMEMO RAN, pp. 809–820 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/978-5-9535-0594-9.
8. Laksmana E. (2022). Fracturing Architecture? The Quad Plus an ASEAN centrality in the Indo-Pacific. Quad Plus and Indo-Pacific: The Changing Profile of International Relations, January, Publisher : Routledge, pp. 111–123.
9. Laksmana E. (2020). Whose Centrality? ASEAN and the Quad in the Indo-Pacific. The Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. Quad Plus. Form versus Substance. Special Issue, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 106–117.
10. Lei Y., Sui S.X. (2021). China-Pacific Island Countries Strategic Partnership: China’s Strategy to Reshape the Regional Order. East Asia, no. 39, pp. 81–96. DOI: 10.1007/s12140-021-09372-z.
11. Lukin A.L. (2009). International Relations in the Asia-Pacific Region: Theoretical Approaches and Concepts. Russia and Asia-Pacific, no. 2, pp. 33–47 (in Russian).
12. Malysheva D.B. (2021). Post-Soviet Central Asia in the Focus of Interests of Major Asian States (2019–2020). Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 82–99 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-2-5.
13. Mosyakov D.V. (2021). New Military Bloc – New Threats to Peace and Security in Asia. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual’nyye problemy razvitiya, vol. III, no. 3 (52), pp. 5–17 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31696/2072-8271-2021-3-3-52-005-017.
14. Pale S.E. (2014). China in Oceania. Asia and Africa today, no. 9 (686), pp. 14– 18 (in Russian).
15. Panda J. (2020). Quad Plus. Form versus Substance. The Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. Quad Plus. Form versus Substance. Special Issue. vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 3–13.
16. Stepanov A.S. (2020). Oceania, Australia and New Zealand in the Context of the U.S.-China Rivalry. USA, Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, no. 12, pp. 62–71 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S268667300012648-2.
17. Sumsky V.V. (2021). “The Indo-Pacific Vision of ASEAN” and the vertical rise of US-Chinese contradictions. International Life, no. 4, pp. 74–89 (in Russian).
18. Swanström N., Panda J. (2021). AUKUS: Resetting European Thinking on the Indo-Pacific? Institute for Security & Development Policy, October, Available at: https://isdp.eu/content/uploads/2021/10/AUKUS-Resetting-European-Thinking-on-the-Indo-Pacific-25.10.21.pdf, accessed 02.06.2022.
19. Terskikh M.A. (2021). Vietnam – Quad: inevitable rapprochement? Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies, Series 2, no. 2, pp. 6–24 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2618-9453-2021-2-6-24.
20. Zelenkova M.S. (2022). ASEAN in the Context of Rising U.S.-China Adversary. National Strategy Issue, no. 1 (70), pp. 31– 49 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Martynova E.S. QUAD and AUKUS and the Balance of Power in the Asia-Pacific Region: Prospects for Russia, China and ASEAN. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2022;15(3):148-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2022.03.09