Cooperation of Russian Regions with International Organizations: Formats and Opportunities on the Example of the Republic of Tatarstan

The article studies the issues of interaction between the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and international organizations, the importance of this type of international cooperation for the socio-economic development of the regions and for the implementation of the Russian foreign policy. The possibilities of participation of the constituent entities in the promotion of national interests on the world stage in the context of increasing external pressure on Russia are considered. The analysis of the issues of political and legal regulation of international and foreign economic relations of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is given, including the questions of participation in the activities of international organizations. The article introduces a classification of formats for the interaction of regions with international organizations and characterizes the features of their implementation, the transformation of the international activity of the regions is demonstrated, according to the evolution of the foreign policy priorities of the state. To evaluate the performance of models of cooperation with integration institutions of various types, the experience of the Republic of Tatarstan is being studied. The importance for socio-economic development and improving the quality of life of the population by participation of the regions in the activities of international organizations as part of the Russian representation in them, or building relationships with international associations at the level of regions and local authorities, as well as holding events under the auspices of international organizations is confirmed. Alternatives for involving the constituent unities in the implementation of essential areas of Russian foreign policy are proposed. The positive role of the regions in maintaining contacts between Russia and a number of leading international organizations is also discovered, along with the search for new low-politicized formats of cooperation, such as partnerships with international associations and structures at the level of local authorities. The potential of the regions appears highly-demanded in the implementation of Russia’s consistent policy to form a multipolar world order.

1. Alekseev D.S. (2020). Russian Strategy for Eurasian Integration: Key Elements, Determinants and Development Prospects. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 3–39 (in Russian). DOI: 10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12- 4-3-39.

2. Budanova E.A. (2017). UNESCO and subjects of the Russian Federation in the system of international relations. Regional’naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, no. 52, article number: 5213, 13 pp. (in Russian). Available at: http://eee-region.ru/article/5213, accessed 14.04.2022.

3. Efremova K.A. (2017). From regionalism to transregionalism: theoretical understanding of the new reality. Comparative Politics Russia, no. 2, pp. 58–72 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-58-72.

4. Ekspertno-analiticheskaya... (2021). Gazizullin N.F. et al. Expert and analytical platform for the regional dimension of the Eurasian integration process. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki, no. 3, pp. 224–227 (in Russian).

5. Farukshin M.Kh. (2003). Comparative federalism, Kazan State University, 282 pp. (in Russian).

6. Gimatdinov R.R. (2020). Development of institutional forms of participation of regions in the processes of Eurasian integration on the example of the Republic of Tatarstan. Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 29–39 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2020-29-39.

7. Gimatdinov R.R., Nasyrov I.R., Sadykova E.L. (2019). Participation of regions in implementation of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation. International Affairs, no. 8, pp. 12–25 (in Russian).

8. Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. (2017). Legal support of international cooperation of municipalities in the Russian Federation. Federalism, no. 4 (88), pp. 63–74 (in Russian).

9. Gomelauri A.S. (2020). The subjects of the federation as actors of the state policy of “soft power” (on the example of the Russian Federation). Issues of national and federal relations, vol. 10, no. 5 (62), pp. 1226–1232 (in Russian). DOI: 10.35775/PSI.2020.62.5.025.

10. Komarov M.E. (2020). Japan. Legacy of the Olympic Games. Asia & Africa today, no. 1, pp. 50–55 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S032150750008167-5.

11. Kosach G. (2020). “Islamic” diplomacy of Russia: Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Religion and Society in the East, no. 4, pp. 96–126 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31696/2542-1530-2020-4-96-126.

12. Linetskii A.F., Tarasov A.G., Kovalev V.E. (2017). The role of regions in Russia’s foreign trade activities in the face of new geopolitical challenges. Economy of regions, vol. 13, issue 3, pp. 827–838 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17059/2017-3-15.

13. Mezhdunarodnye i vneshneekonomicheskie svyazi… (2017). Gafurov I.R., Gimatdinov R.R., Nasyrov I.R. (eds.) International and foreign economic relations of Russian regions: experience of the Republic of Tatarstan: Tutorial, Kazan: Kazan University, 471 pp. (in Russian).

14. Mukhametshin F.M. (2022). Dialogue of civilizations and prospects for cooperation. To the 15th Anniversary of the Strategic Vision Group “Russia – Islamic World”. International Affairs, no. 2, pp. 26–33 (in Russian).

15. Nasyrov I.R. (2011). State and regions in the system of modern international relations, Kazan : University of Management “TISBI”, 399 pp. (in Russian).

16. Nenadyshina T.S. (2021). Trade facilitation: concept and relevance for the economic development of Russia. RUDN Journal of Economics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 554– 566 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2329-2021-29-3-554-566.

17. Novikov D., Skriba A. (2019). The Evolution of Russian Strategy towards BRICS. Strategic Analysis, vol. 43, no. 6, рр. 585– 596. DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2019.1672129.

18. Novikov D.P. (2018). Greater Eurasian Partnership: Possible Regional Influence and Russia’s Interests. International Organizations Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 82–96 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2018-03-05.

19. Petrushenko M.F. (2018). Russian policy of “soft security” within the framework of the integration mechanisms of the SCO and BRICS. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: ekonomika i upravlenie, vol. 7, no. 3 (24), pp. 373–377 (in Russian).

20. Sergunin A., Gao, F. (2018). BRICS as the Subject of Study of International Relations Theory. International Organizations Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, рр. 55–73. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2018-04-03.

21. Shcherbakova D.V., Medved’ A.A. (2018). Factors of investment attractiveness of Russian regions. Administrative Consulting, vol. 11, pp. 119–131 (in Russian). DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-11-119-131.

22. Suleymanov R.R. (2016). Turkey’s influence in Tatarstan: factor of “soft power”. Musul’manskij mir, no. 1, pp. 6–26 (in Russian).

23. Voronkov L.S. (2012). International organizations in the system of international relations: trends and development prospects. Bulletin of MGIMO-University, no. 3 (24), pp. 7–16 (in Russian).

24. Zhadan V.N. (2016). On the issue of interaction and cooperation between Russia and international organizations. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, no. 3 (86), part III, pp. 33–37 (in Russian).