The Struggle between the Qatari-Turkish and Saudi-Emirati Bloc for the Infl uence in Afghanistan
https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2022.02.13
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the confrontation between the Qatari-Turkish and Saudi-Emirate blocs for the influence in the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. It was found out that with the change of power in August 2021 in Afghanistan, a number of regional players tried to assert their influence in the country. Qatar was particularly active in strengthening its positions, having managed to close the negotiation process between the United States and the Taliban before they came to power. It is also important that Saudi Arabia and the UAE claimed the role of a diplomatic mediator, but the approval of Qatar's candidacy led to the strengthening of the positions of the Qatari-Turkish alliance. Turkey provided impressive humanitarian assistance to the country, and also jointly with Qatar defended the right to restore an important infrastructure facility – the Kabul airport, which was also claimed by the UAE. Pakistan, which is the military wing of the Taliban, continues to have an important influence on the internal political situation in Afghanistan. The formation of a new Afghan government in the fall of 2021 determined the balance of power in the country in favor of Qatar and Pakistan, which support the political and power bloc, respectively. Saudi Arabia has failed to find the necessary levers of influence on the new Afghan government, but does not lose hope of using Pakistan as its proxy for pressure on the Taliban, in order to prevent the strengthening of the Iranian positions in Afghanistan. Thus, Afghanistan continues to be an arena of struggle for regional influence.
Keywords
Afghanistan,
the Tatar-Turkish alliance,
Saudi Arabia,
the Taliban,
Pakistan,
the UAE,
Turkey,
islamism
About the Authors
T. R. Khayrullin
Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy Sciences; RUDN University; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Timur R. KHAYRULLIN, PhD in Politics, senior researcher, Centre for Civilizational and regional studies; Senior researcher, Department of African and Arabic Studies; Senior lecturer
123001, Spiridonovka St., 30/1, Moscow
117198, Miklukho-Maklai St., 6. Moscow
125993, Leningradskii St., 49, Moscow
A. V. Korotayev
HSE University; RUDN University; Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey V. KOROTAYEV, Professor; Leading researcher, Department of African and Arabic Studies; Head Researcher, Center for Civilizational and Regional Studies
101000, Myasnitskaya St. 20, Moscow
117198, Miklukho-Maklai St., 6. Moscow
123001, Spiridonovka St., 30/1, Moscow
References
1. Glenn C. (2017). Libya's Islamists: Who They Are – And What They Want. Wilson Center, available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/libyas-islamistswho-they-are-and-what-they-want, accessed 16.01.2022.
2. Kaura V. (2021). Turkey and the Taliban. Middle East Institute, July 23, available at: https://www.mei.edu/blog/turkey-and-taliban, accessed 1 4.01.2022.
3. Ketchley N. (2017). Egypt in a Time of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218 pp. DOI:10.1017/9781316882702.
4. Khayrullin T.R. (2019). The Struggle for Leadership in the Arab region. Do Islamists have a Chance? Moscow: Institute for African Studies of the RAS, 214 pp. (in Russian).
5. Khodynskaya-Golenisheva M.S. (2018). The Syrian crisis in the transforming world order: the role of emigrant opposition structures. Asia and Africa today, no 2, pp. 11–15 (in Russian).
6. Madini T. (2014). The “holy Alliance” between Qatar, Ennahda and Takfiri movements (“Al-Khalf al-mukaddas” baina qatar va an-nahda va al-tayarat al-takfi riya). Al-vahda al-islamiya, available at: https://www.wahdaislamyia.org/issues/145/tmadini.htm, accessed 16.01.2022 (in Arabic).
7. Özpek B., Demirağ Y. (2014). Turkish foreign policy after the ‘Arab Spring’: from agenda-setter state to agenda-entrepreneur state. Israel Affairs, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 328–346. DOI:10.1080/13537121.2014.922806.
8. Pakistan: Shoring up Afghanistan’s peace process (2021). Crisis Group, available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/pakistan/b169-pakistan-shoring-afghanistans-peace-process, accessed 14.01.2022.
9. Rupert J. (1989). Afghanistan's Slide Toward Civil War. World Policy Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 759–785.
10. Stepanova E. (2021). Russia and the Search for a Negotiated Solution in Afghanistan. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 928–952. DOI:10.1080/09668136.2020.1826908.
11. Susser A. (2011). Jordan 2011: Uneasy lies the head. Crown Center for Middle East Studies: Middle East Brief, no. 52, pp. 1–10.
12. Tausch A. (2011). On the global political and economic environment of the current Al Jazeera Revolution. Middle East Studies Online Journal, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 7–55.
13. Vasiliev A.M., Khayrullin T.R., Korotayev A.V. (2019). New Alliance in struggle for leadership in the Arab region. Asia and Africa today, no. 10, pp. 2–9. DOI:10.31857/S032150750006519-2 (in Russian).
14. Yousaf M., Adkin M. (1992). The Bear Trap: Afghanistan's Untold Story. London: Mark Cooper, 243 pp.
Review
For citations:
Khayrullin T.R., Korotayev A.V. The Struggle between the Qatari-Turkish and Saudi-Emirati Bloc for the Infl uence in Afghanistan. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2022;15(2):240-252. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/kgt/2022.02.13
Views:
511
Email this article 