Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

Military-political Strategy of J. Biden’s Administration

Abstract

Currently, the military-political strategy of J. Biden’s administration is in the process of formation. The American ruling circles have to take into account unfavorable changes for the United States in the military- and political situation in the world. The American policy of “regime change” has suffered a complete collapse in Afghanistan; the United States is facing the strengthening of the military- and technical potential of the Russian Federation and China. Under these conditions, official Washington is betting on strengthening relations with partners and allies and is trying to abandon some of its international obligations (as, for example, it happened in Afghanistan). When developing its nuclear and space strategy, as well as military strategy in various regions of the world, the American military and political leadership is forced to proceed from the fact that Washington has lost its once indisputable military superiority in a number of areas. President Biden's actual rejection of the policy of promoting democracy in the world calls into question Washington's claims to leadership in the community of democratic states. At the same time, the priorities of the American ruling circles are clearly shifting in the direction of the Indo-Pacific region – while the Middle East is losing its former priority in their eyes.

About the Author

V. I. Batyuk
National Research University Higher School of Economics; Center for the Military-Political Studies Institute for the US and Canadian Studies
Russian Federation

Vladimir I. BATYUK, DSc in History, Professor; Leading Researcher, Director

119017, Malaya Ordinka, 17, Moscow

121069 Khlebnyj Lane, 2/3, Moscow



References

1. Arbatov A. (2020). New Technological Factors and Prospects for Arms Control / Arms Control in New Military-Political, and Technological Conditions. Moscow: IMEMO RAN, 2020, 177 р. (in Russian).

2. DOD Military and Associated Terms (2020). As of June, 358 р.

3. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance (2021). March, President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., 23 р.

4. Konyshev V. (2009). US Military Strategy after the End of the Cold War. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka, 178 р. (in Russian).

5. Kortunov А. (2020). In the Rainy Season, You Can Not Do Without an Umbrella. Russia in Global Affairs, August 2 (in Russian). Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/god-bez-zontika/, accessed 10.11.2021.

6. Luttwak E. (2017). Strategy. The Logic of War and Peace. Translated from English. Third Edition. Moscow: University of Dmitry Pozharsky, 2017, 590 р. (in Russian).

7. Mearsheimer J., Walt S. (2016). The Case for Off shore Balancing. A Superior U.S. Grand Strategy. Foreign Aff airs, July/ August, pp. 70–83.

8. Nuclear Posture Review (2018). US Department of Defense, February. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEARPOSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.pdf, accessed 01.11.2021.

9. Nuclear Posture Review Report (2010). US Department of Defense, April. Available at: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/NPR/2010_Nuclear_Posture_Review_Report.pdf, accessed 01.11.2021.

10. Trofimenko G. (1984). Evolution of the US military-political strategy. Modern US foreign policy. In two volumes, vol 1, Moscow: Nauka, 257 p. (in Russian).

11. Vaddi P., Acton J. (2020). A ReSTART for U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control: Enhancing Security Through Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2020, 26 p.


Review

For citations:


Batyuk V.I. Military-political Strategy of J. Biden’s Administration. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2022;15(2):115-132. (In Russ.)

Views: 554


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)