Hybrid War as a Part of the Post-global World

The ongoing process of militarization of the informational environment leads to the evolution of approaches to the force-based methods of transformation of the geopolitical balance. It appears that the methods based upon the capabilities to limit the escalation appear to be the most acceptable. However, they open the door for chaotization of viral regions. That increases sharply the interest of the key players in the world politics towards this model of interstate competition that includes military means but is still below the level of classic conventional conflict. Earlier the use of such methods based upon the methods of interrelated informational, psychological and cyber-informational influence were addressed with caution since even 5–7 years ago these methods were not properly elaborated yet and did not give guaranteed results, as well as were related to the high risks of disclosure of the basic information about the organizers of actions and mostly were regarded as supplementary element to the more robust and tested methods of direct military aggression. Nowadays the leading role in the spectrum of military instruments is occupied by the hybrid wars that are a complex phenomenon that includes diverse instruments of political, informational and military (force) nature. The new potential of digital information society serves as an integrating basis for hybrid wars. With their emergence and practical approbation of the new model of war as well as their structural sophistication integration with the force instruments world enters a drastically new political era in which hybrid wars and especially the methods of informational manipulations take the leading roles and become the major instruments of the implementation of the state politics. For Russia that means a substantial change of the environment for competition with other countries as well as for an ultimate necessity to supplement to the foreign policy inventory with the new capabilities that go beyond classic diplomacy and also beyond the soft power potential that is rather underdeveloped in Russia.

1. Bartosh A. (2019). The Model of Hybrid War. Voennaya mysl’, May 1, 2019. Available at: https://vm.ric.mil.ru/Stati/item/191517, accessed 25.01.2021 (in Russian).

2. Batuk V. (ed.) (2018). Low Intensity Conflict in American Military-Political Strategy in the Beginning of XXI Century, Moscow: Ves’ mir (in Russian).

3. Chernysh A.Ya., Popov V.V. (2019). On the Evolution of Theory and Practice of the Integrated Information Environment and Urgent Steps for Its Development to Sophisticate the Management System of National Defense of the Russian Federation. Voennaya mysl’, no 9, pp. 47–54. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ob-evolyutsii-teorii-i-praktiki-edinogo-informatsionnogo-prostranstva-i-pervoocherednyhmerah-po-ego-razvitiyu-v-interesah/viewer, accessed 25.05.2021 (in Russian).

4. Drozdov Yu.I., Markin A.G. (2007). Perky Eagle-2007 (Intelligence of War in the USA System), Moscow: Artstil’-poligrafiya (in Russian).

5. Filin N.A. (2015). Unsuccessful Revolution of Islamic Color. The Source of Rise and Decline Green Movement, Moscow: LENAND (in Russian).

6. Haas R. (2019). A World in Disarray. American Foreign Policy of the Crisis of Old Order, Moscow: AST (in Russian).

7. Hoffman F.G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.

8. Kaldor M. (2016). New and Old Wars. Organized Violence in a Global Era, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gajdara (in Russian).

9. Kokoshin A.A. (2019). The Issues of Applied Theory of War, Moscow: HSE (in Russian).

10. Konyshev V., Parfenov R. (2019). Hybrid Wars – between Myth and Reality. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 63, no 12, pp. 56–66 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-56-66

11. Liddel Hart B. (2012). Strategy: The Indirect Approach, Moscow: Astrel’ (in Russian).

12. Nye J.S. (2004). Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs.

13. Rushkoff D. (2013). Present Shock. When Everything Happens Now, New York: Current.

14. Schelling T. (2014). The Strategy of Confl ct, Moscow: IRISJeN, Socium (in Russian).

15. Scheurer M. (2008). Marching towards Hell. America and Islam after Iraq, New York: Free Press.

16. Simons G. (2019). Digital Communication Disrupting Hegemonic Power in Global Geopolitics. Russia in Global Affairs, no 2. Available at: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/digital-communication-disrupting-hegemonic-power-in-global-geopolitics/, accessed 25.05.2021.

17. Slipchenko V. (2002). Sixth Generation’s Wars. Weapons and Art of War in the Future, Moscow: Veche (in Russian).

18. Tikhanychev O.V. (2020). Hybrid Wars: A New World in the Art of War or the Well Forgotten Old Story? Security Issues, no 1, pp. 30–43 (in Russian). DOI: 10.25136/24097543.2020.1.30256

19. Tsygankov P.A. (2014). Political Dynamics of Contemporary World: Theory and Practice, Moscow: MSU (in Russian).