On the Rules of Fair Play and Legal Conflicts in High Performance Sports

At the present stage of medical technologies development, high-performance sports have faced serious difficulties. Its rules and fundamental principles not only fail to keep pace with changes in law and society, but also sometimes contradict themselves. High-performance sports is a balance between the basic rights to selfdetermination as a person of a certain gender and the rules of fair play. The reality is that in order to win sports competitions, people go to extreme measures, for example, changing their biological gender. In this situation, determining the persons (men, women) with whom an athlete should compete becomes not such a simple task, there is legal uncertainty, which sometimes does not provide an opportunity to clearly determine what gender a particular athlete is. The unequal struggle or “death of women’s sports” as such, as well as concerns that men who become women gain an unfair advantage in women’s competitions and the increasing number of cases of participation of transgender athletes in international competitions, prompted the authors of the article to analyze the foreign experience of legal regulation of the participation of such persons in high-performance sports. What is more important: the right to self-determination and self-acceptance as a person of the opposite sex or the rules of fair play? If there are special and general rules of legal regulation, a normative act of a private nature is applied, defining the “self-determination of a person” as a dominant in sports matters. But is everything so clear in high-performance sports? Legal conflicts and ambiguous legal situations (legally significant circumstances) are considered within the framework of this article.

1. Aschwanden C. (2019). Trans Athletes Are Posting Victories and Shaking up Sports. Wired Magazine, October 29, 2019. Available at:https://www.wired.com/story/the-glorious-victories-of-trans-athletes-are-shaking-upsports/, accessed 01.12.2020.

2. Braginskyi M.I., Vitryanskyi V.V (2016). Contract law. Book one: General Provisions, Moscow: Statut (in Russian).

3. Byhanovskyi A.O. (2016). Transsexualism and Related Conditions, Rostov-onDon: Mini Type (in Russian).

4. Declarations of the General Assemblies (1995). Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20120711224528/http://www.fairplayeur.com/declarations/declarations.html/, accessed 01.12.2020.

5. From Intolerance in Sports to Tolerance through Sports (1997). Sports for Everyone, no 1, pp. 25–29. Available at: http://lib.sportedu.ru/press/sfa/1997N1/p25-29.htm, accessed 15.01.2021 (in Russian).

6. General Assembly Resolution S-16/1 of December 14, 1989 (1989). Available at: https://base.garant.ru/2565327/, accessed 15.01.2021 (in Russian).

7. House Bill No. 500 (2020). Legislature of the State of Idaho. Available at: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2020/legislation/H0500.pdf, accessed 01.12.2020.

8. K-12 Policies. Transathlete.com. Available at: https://www.transathlete.com/k-12/, accessed 01.12.2020.

9. Maxeiner J.R. (2008). Some Realism about Legal Certainty in the Globalization of the Rule of Law. Houston Journal of International Law, vol. 31, no 1, pp. 27–46. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1230457, accessed 30.05.2021.

10. Notification of the Court on the Impossibility of Challenging the Decision CAS. Available at: https://www.bger.ch/files/live/sites/bger/files/pdf/de/4A_248_2019_yyyy_mm_dd_T_d_18_18_02.pdf/, accessed 01.12.2020.

11. Shelutto M.L. (2017). On the Legal Recognition of Gender Change. Journal of Foreign Law and Comparative Law, no 5(66), pp. 54–61 (in Russian). DOI: 10.12737/article_59bbac1ab9b566.75071663

12. Swiss Federal Court Decision (2020). Available at: https://www.bger.ch/ext/euros-pider/live/fr/php/aza/http/index.php?highlight_docid=aza%3A%2F%2Faza://25-082020-4A_248-2019&lang=de&zoom=&type=show_document, accessed 01.12.2020.

13. The European Convention on Human Rights of 1950 (1950). KonsultantPyus. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_29160/, accessed 15.01.2021 (in Russian).

14. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the Resolution of 05.14.2003 N 8-P, Defi itions of 05.10.2000 N 199O, of 01.12.1999 N 211-O (2003). Laws, Codes and Regulations in the Russian Federation. Available at: https://legalacts.ru/doc/postanovlenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-14052003-n/, accessed 15.01.2021 (in Russian).