Quantitative Indicators of Text Style as a Factor of the Post Promotion in a Social Media Protest Communication

A complete analysis of protest activity in the XXI century is not possible without an account of complex interrelations between online and offline behavior of different actors. Social media and the whole internet-space become a placement for new forms of behavior that transform the classical types of protest activity. Digital placements are not neutral to the communication due to specific laws and characteristics of online-interactions that affect the way actors try to communicate in the online and the extent they succeed doing that. This work investigates the influence of quantitative characteristics of text style on communication around protest movement in social media. The set of used characteristics consisted of mean length of a word in a post, the number of words in a post, a fraction of question marks over number of words in a post, a fraction of exclamation marks over number of words in a post, a fraction of brackets over over number of words in a post and a dummy on the difference between opening and closing brackets. Using regression analysis on a sample of original posts published in social media “Vkontakte” in 2018, we found that quantitative characteristics of text style have statistically significant impact on the promotion of the politically engaged posts. However, the predictive ability of these predictors to describe the variation between activity and broadness of protest communication in different context was inconsiderable.

1. Ahremenko A.S., Stukal D.K., Petrov A.P. (2020) Network or Text? Factors of Protest Propagation in Social Media: Theory and Data Analysis. POLIS, no 2, pp. 73–91 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.02.06

2. Ahremenko A. S., Filippov I. B. (2019) The Impact of Forcible Suppression of a Protest on the Discussion of a Protest Action in Social Networks. Monitoring of Public Opinion, no 5, pp. 220–225 (in Russian). DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.5.10

3. Akhremenko A., Yureskul E., Petrov A. (2019) Latent Factors of Protest Participation: A Basic Computational Model. 2019 Twelfth International Conference “Management of Large-scale System Development” (MLSD). IEEE, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/MLSD.2019.8910999

4. Arafa M., Armstrong C. (2016) “Facebook to Mobilize, Twitter to Coordinate Protests, and YouTube to Tell the World”: New Media, Cyberactivism, and the Arab Spring. Journal of Global Initiatives: Policy, Pedagogy, Perspective, vol. 10, no 1, pp. 73–102. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1187&context=jgi, accessed 20.05.2020.

5. Ayanian A.H., Tausch N. (2016) How Risk Perception Shapes Collective Action Intentions in Repressive Contexts: A Study of Egyptian Activists during the 2013 Post-coup Uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 55, no 4, pp. 700–721. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12164

6. Barberá P., Jost J., Nagler J. (2015) Tweeting from Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? Psychological Science, vol. 26, no 10, pp. 1531–1542. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615594620

7. Breuer A., Landman T., Farquhar D. (2015) Social Media and Protest Mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian Revolution. Democratization, vol. 22, no 4, pp. 764–792. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2014.885505

8. Della Porta D. (2017) Global Diffusion of Protest: Riding the Protest Wave in the Neoliberal Crisis, Amsterdam: University Press.

9. Drury J., Reicher S. (2000) Collective Action and Psychological Change: The Emergence of New Social Identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 39, no 4, pp. 579–604. DOI: 10.1348/014466600164642

10. Fewsmith J. (2001) China since Tiananmen: The Politics of Transition, Cambridge: University Press.

11. González-Bailón S., Wang N. (2016) Networked Discontent: The Anatomy of Protest Campaigns in Social Media. Social Networks, vol. 44, pp. 95–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.003

12. Himelboim I. et al. (2016) Valencebased Homophily on Twitter: Network Analysis of Emotions and Political Talk in the 2012 Presidential Election. New Media & Society, vol. 18, no 7, pp. 1382–1400. DOI: 10.1177/1461444814555096

13. Honari A. (2018) “We Will Either Find a Way, or Make One”: How Iranian Green Movement Online Activists Perceive and Respond to Repression. Social Media+Society, vol. 4, no 3, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305118803886

14. Howard P.N., Hussain M.M. (2011) The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media. Journal of Democracy, vol. 22, no 3, pp. 35–48. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2011.0041

15. Larson J., Nagler J., Ronen J., Tucker J. (2019) Social Networks and Protest Participation: Evidence from 130 Million Twitter Users. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 63, no 3, pp. 690–705. DOI: 10.7910/DVN/RLLL1V

16. Lynch M. (2011) After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 301–310. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592711000910

17. Nugent E. (2019) The Psychology of Repression and Polarization. World Politics, vol. 72, no 2, pp. 291–334. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887120000015

18. Onuch O., Sasse G. (2016) The Maidan in Movement: Diversity and the Cycles of Protest. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 68, no 4, pp. 556–587. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1159665

19. Opp K-D., Gern C. (1993) Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989. American Sociological Review, vol. 58, no 5, pp. 659–680. DOI: 10.2307/2096280

20. Peterson A., Wahlström M. (2015) Repression: The Governance of Domestic Dissent. The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements (eds. Della Porta D., Diani M.), pp. 634–652. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.2

21. Wolfsfeld G., Segev E., Sheafer T. (2013) Social Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First. The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 18, no 2, pp. 115–137. DOI: 10.1177/1940161212471716

22. Wong S.C., Wright S. (2019) Hybrid Mediation Opportunity Structure? A Case Study of Hong Kong’s Anti-National Education Movement. New Media & Society, pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.1177/1461444819879509

23. Young L.E. (2019) The Psychology of State Repression: Fear and Dissent Decisions in Zimbabwe. American Political Science Review, vol. 113, no 1, pp. 140–155. DOI: 10.1017/S000305541800076X