Цифровая экономика и тенденции политического развития современных обществ

Статья посвящена теоретическому анализу возможных последствий цифровой трансформации современных обществ. Авторы осуществляют сравнительный анализ трех политико-экономических моделей цифровой трансформации: когнитивного капитализма, экономики совместного производства и потребления (Р2Р-экономики) и цифрового тоталитаризма. Делается вывод, что данные теоретические модели отражают противоречивые тенденции развития общества на стадии цифровой трансформации. Авторы высказывают предположение, что в реальности возникнет широкий спектр смешанных политико-экономических моделей цифрового общества, каждая из которых будет включать в себя ту или иную комбинацию проанализированных идеальных типов. Реализация той или иной модели будет зависеть от группы факторов, включающих национальную структуру экономики, систему международных отношений, территориальную структуру урбанизации и способность (политическую, экономическую и технологическую) того или иного национального государства сохранять свой суверенитет в цифровом мире.

1. Горц А. (2007) Знание, стоимость и капитал. К критике экономики знаний // Логос. № 4(61). С. 5–63.

2. Ефремов А.А. (2017) Формирование концепции информационного суверенитета государства // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. № 1. С. 201–215. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.1.201.215

3. Коулман С. (2018) Может ли Интернет укрепить демократию? СПб.: Алетейя.

4. Манойло А.В. (2008) Модель информационно-психологической операции в международных конфликтах // Право и политика. № 6. C. 1387–1394 // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/modeli-informatsionno-psihologicheskogo-upravleniya-mezhdunarodnymi-konfliktami/viewer, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

5. Матвеев И.А. (2012) Электронная экономика: сущность и этапы развития // Управление экономическими системами: электронный научный журнал. № 6(42). С. 1–11 // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnaya-ekonomika-suschnost-i-etapy-razvitiya/viewer, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

6. Польре Б. (2008) Когнитивный капитализм на марше // Политический журнал. № 2(179). С. 66–72.

7. Программа «Цифровая экономика Российской Федерации». Утверждена Распоряжением Правительства Российской Федерации от 28 июля 2017 г. № 1632-р // http://static.government.ru/media/files/9gFM4FHj4PsB79I5v7yLVuPgu4bvR7M0.pdf, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

8. th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016), CHI EA. 7–12 May 2016.

9. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe (2015) // European Commission // https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/content/european-digital-strategy, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

10. Alizadeh T., Farid R. (2017) Political Economy of Telecommunication Infrastructure: An Investigation of the National Broadband Network Early Rollout and Pork Barrel Politics in Australia // Telecommunications Policy, vol. 41, no 4, pp. 242–252. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.02.002

11. Bauwens M. (2005) The Political Economy of Peer Production // Ctheory.net, December 1, 2005 // http://ctheory.net/ctheory_wp/the-political-economy-of-peer-production/, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

12. Bennett W.L. (2012) The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 644, no 1, pp. 20–39. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212451428

13. Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. (2001) The Power of Gifts: Organizing Social Relationships in Open Source Communities // Information Systems Journal, vol. 11, no 4, pp. 305–320. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00111.x

14. Coglianese C., Lehr D. (2017) Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-learning Era // Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 105, no 5, pp. 1147–1223 // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2928293, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

15. Coles-Kemp L., Ashenden D., O’Hara K. (2018) Why Should I? Cybersecurity, the Security of the State and the Insecurity of the Citizen // Politics and Governance, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 41–48. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i2.1333

16. Couldry N., Mejias U.A. (2018) Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject // Television and New Media, vol. 20, no 4, pp. 336–349. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418796632

17. Cowan R., David P.A., Foray D. (2000) The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness // Industrial and Corporative Change, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 211–253. DOI: 10.1093/icc/9.2.211

18. Criado J.I., Sandoval-Almazan R., Gil- Garcia J.R. (2013) Government Innovation through Social Media // Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no 4, pp. 319–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003

19. Damon L. (1986) Freedom of Information versus National Sovereignty: The Need for a New Global Forum for the Resolution of Transborder Date Flow Problems // Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 262–287 // https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&context=ilj, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

20. Datta A. (2018) The Digital Turn in Postcolonial Urbanism: Smart Citizenship in the Making of India’s 100 Smart Cities // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 43, no 3, pp. 405–419. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12225

21. De Filippi P., McCarthy S. (2012) Cloud Computing: Centralization and Data Sovereignty // European Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 1–21 // http://ejlt.org/article/view/101/234, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

22. Forest B. (2004) Information Sovereignty and GIS: The Evolution of “Communities of Interest” in Political Redistricting // Political Geography, vol. 23, no 4, pp. 425–451. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.010

23. Fung A. (2015) Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citi zen Participation and Its Future // Public Administration Review, vol. 75, no 4, pp. 513–522. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12361

24. Gilman H.R. (2016) Democracy Reinvented: Participatory Budgeting and Civic Innovation in America, USA: New America and Harvard’s Ash Center for Democratic Innovation and Governance.

25. Giraud E. (2015) Subjectivity 2.0: Digital Technologies, Participatory Media and Communicative Capitalism // Subjectivity, vol. 8, no 2, pp. 124–146. DOI: 10.1057/sub.2015.5

26. Gong W. (2005) Information Sovereignty Reviewed // Intercultural Communication Studies, vol. 14, no 1, pp. 119–135 // http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.465.6373&rep=rep1&type=pdf, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

27. Hamari J., Sjoklint M., Ukkonen A. (2016) The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 67, no 9, pp. 2047–2059. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23552

28. Hanna P., Vanclay F., Langdon E.J., Arts J. (2016) Conceptualizing Social Protest and the Significance of Protest Actions to Large Projects // Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 217–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2015.10.006

29. Havu K. (2017) The EU Digital Single Market from a Consumer Standpoint: How Do Promises Meet Means? // Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 146–183. DOI: 10.22381/CRLSJ9220179

30. Helbing D. (2018) Digital Fascism Rising? // Towards Digital Enlightenment: Essay on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution (ed. Helbing D.), Zurich: CLU 1, ETH Zurich, pp. 99–102.

31. Herrera L. (2015) Citizenship under Surveillance: Dealing with the Digital Age // International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 47, no 2, pp. 354–356. DOI: 10.1017/S0020743815000100

32. Hindman M. (2008) The Myth of Digital Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

33. Irion K. (2012) Government Cloud Computing and National Data Sovereignty // Policy and Internet, vol. 4, no 3–4, pp. 40–71. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.10

34. Ismagilova E., Hughes L., Dwivedi Y.K., Raman K.R. (2019) Smart Cities: Advances in Research – An Information Systems Perspective // International Journal of Information Management, vol. 47, pp. 88–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004

35. Janowski T. (2015) Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization // Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no 3, pp. 221–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001

36. Jordana J. (2017) Transgovernmental Networks as Regulatory Intermediaries: Horizontal Collaboration and the Realities of Soft Power // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 670, no 1, pp. 245–262. DOI: 10.1177/0002716217694591

37. Kamolov S.G. (2017) Digital Public Governance: Trends and Risks // Giornale di Storia Costituzionale, vol. 33, no 1, pp. 185–194.

38. Karim R., Bonhi T.C., Afroze R. (2019) Governance of Cyberspace: Personal Liberty vs. National Security // International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 8, no 11, pp. 2636–2641 // https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/nov2019/Governance-Of-Cyberspace-Personal-Liberty-Vs-National-Security.pdf, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

39. Keane J. (2013) Democracy and Media Decadence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

40. Kim S., Lee J. (2012) E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government // Public Administration Review, vol. 72, no 6, pp. 819–828. DOI: 10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x

41. Klusterman R.C. (2010) This Is not America: Embedding the Cognitive cultural Urban Economy // Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, vol. 92, no 2, pp. 131–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00338.x

42. Knuth R. (1999) Sovereignty, Globalism, and Information Flow in Complex Emergencies // Information Society, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 11–19. DOI: 10.1080/019722499128637

43. Kostakis V. (2012) The Political Economy of Information Production in the Social Web: Chances for Reflection on Our Institutional Design // Contemporary Social Science, vol. 7, no 3, pp. 305–319. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.691988

44. Kostakis V., Roos A., Bauwens M. (2016) Towards a Political Ecology of the Digital Economy: Socio-environmental Implications of Two Competing Value Models // Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 18, pp. 82–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.002

45. Kwet M. (2019) Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South // Race and Class, vol. 60, no 4, pp. 3–26. DOI: 10.1177/0306396818823172

46. Lee C.-P., Chang K., Berry F.S. (2011) Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective // Public Administration Review, vol. 71, no 3, pp. 444–454. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x

47. Loader B.D., Mercea D. (2011) Introduction Networking Democracy? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics // Information Communication and Society, vol. 14, no 6, pp. 757–769. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648

48. Mahmoudi D., Levenda A. (2016) Beyond the Screen: Uneven Geographies, Digital Labor, and the City of Cognitivecultural Capitalism // TripleC, vol.14, no 1, pp. 99–220 // https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/155/, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

49. Mann M., Daly A. (2019) Data and the North-in-South: Australia’s Informational Imperialism and Digital Colonialism // Television and New Media, vol. 20, no 4, pp. 379–395. DOI: 10.1177/1527476418806091

50. Martin C.J. (2016) The Sharing Economy: A Pathway to Sustainability or a Nightmarish Form of Neoliberal Capitalism? // Ecological Economics, vol. 121, pp. 149–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027

51. Mueller M., Mathiason J., Klein H. (2007) The Internet and Global Governance: Principles and Norms for a New Regime // Global Governance, vol. 13, no 2, pp. 237–254. DOI: 10.1163/19426720-01302007

52. Nechushtai E. (2018) Could Digital Platform Capture the Media through Infrastructure // Journalism, vol. 19, no 8, pp. 1043–1058. DOI: 10.1177/1464884917725163

53. Negroponte N. (1999) Being Digital, New York: Knopf.

54. OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015 (2015), Paris: OECD Publishing. Pereira G.V., Parycek P., Falco E.,

55. Kleinhans R. (2018) Smart Governance in the Context of Smart Cities: A Literature Review // Information Polity, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 143–162. DOI: 10.3233/IP-170067

56. Powers S. (2014) Towards Information Sovereignty // Beyond NETmundial: The Roadmap for Institutional Improvements to the Global Internet Governance Ecosystem, Philadelphia: Center for Global Communication Studies, pp. 90–99.

57. Price M. (2002) Media and Sovereignty: The Global Information Revolution and Its Challenge to State Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

58. Rabari Ch., Storper M. (2015) The Digital Skin of Cities: Urban Theory and Research in the Age of the Sensored and Metered City, Ubiquitous Computing and Big Data // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 8, no 1, pp. 27–42. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsu021

59. Richardson L. (2015) Performingthe Sharing Economy // Geoforum,vol. 67, pp. 121–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.004

60. Scott A.J. (2008) Social Economy of Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cites, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

61. Scott A., Peters M.A. (2013) Cognitive- Cultural Production, Digital Labor and the New Frontiers of Knowledge // Knowledge Cultures, vol. 1, no 4, pp. 167–178 // https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281502483_Cognitive-Cultural_Production_Digital_Labour_And_The_New_Frontiers_Of_Knowledge_A_Conversation_With_Allen_J_Scott, дата обращения 20.05.2020.

62. Seely P. (2016) Envision the Digital Sustainability Panopticon: A Thought Experiment of How Big Data May Help Advancing Sustainability in the Digital Age // Sustainability Science, vol. 11, no 5, pp. 845–854. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0381-5

63. Spencer D. (2017) Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age: The Politics of Production and Digital Technologies // Work, Employment and Society, vol. 31, no 1, pp. 142–152. DOI: 10.1177/0950017016645716

64. Taylor L. (2017) What Is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally // Big Data and Society, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/2053951717736335

65. Thatcher J., O’Sullivan D., Mahmoudi D. (2016) Data Colonialism through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data // Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 34, no 6, pp. 990–1006. DOI: 10.1177/0263775816633195

66. Turner G. (2010) Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn, London: Sage.

67. Weber R.H. (2010) Internet of Things – New Security and Privacy Challenges // Computer Law and Security Review, vol. 26, no 1, pp. 23–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008

68. West D.M. (2005) Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

69. Wolfson T. (2014) Digital Rebellion: The Birth of the Cyber Left, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

70. Youmans W.L., York, J.C. (2012) Social Media and the Activist Toolkit: User Agreements, Corporate Interests, and the Information Infrastructure of Modern Social Movements // Journal of Communication, vol. 62, no 2, pp. 315–329. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x

71. Zeng J., Stevens T., Chen Y. (2017) China’s Solution to Global Cyber Governance: Unpacking the Domestic Discourse of “Internet Sovereignty” // Politics and Policy, vol. 45, no 3, pp. 432–464. DOI: 10.1111/polp.12202