Preview

Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право

Расширенный поиск

The EU’s Humanitarian Policy in Africa and Migration Crisis

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-5-142-163

Полный текст:

Аннотация

The article considers the essence and peculiarities of realizing of human security in the EU external policy in general and specifically in Africa. The article reveals the principles of the EU interest in Africa as a focus of their humanitarian policy: phantoms of the collective memory of the political class of Western European countries, huge potential of resources and markets, migration and terrorist threat. It is argued that this policy is considered by the EU as its strategic foreign policy narrative, in the course of which the Union, while ensuring the security of the African continent, primarily realizes its own interests. Specific features of the interpretation of this narrative in official documents of Germany as a key member of the EU are specified. It is revealed that Germany aims to play a major role in shaping European policy towards the African continent, and the specificity of its approach is economic-centric, which distinguishes it from the EU’s general approach to Africa. The key question of the article is how is disinterested Germany’s role, despite its permeation with the spirit of liberal values as a supplier of human security to African countries. It is shown that the discrimination of refugees and migrants in migration flows in the EU emphasized the importance of the Union’s activities in ensuring human security in Africa. In accordance with its goal to become the leading actor of the EU policy on the continent, its role as a leader of the liberal world and the peculiarities of the consequences of the migration crisis for the political and party system of the country and the stability of the social state, Germany proposed the German “Marshall Plan” for Africa as a concretization of its humanitarian policy on the continent. The parameters of this Plan, its advantages and implementation difficulties are considered. It is concluded that Germany’s approach to Africa, on the whole, indisputably contributes to the latter’s development. At the same time, it is to a large extent focused on solving the tasks of ensuring national security of Germany itself, promoting the interests of German business, creating new German “reserves” in Africa through the African partnership. In this bi-directional process there is no obvious contradiction, but the results of this process can become ambivalent.

Об авторе

M. A. Kukartseva
Diplomatic Academy of Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Россия

Marina A. KUKARTSEVA, DSc in Philosophy, Professor, Department of International and National Security

53/2, Ostozhenka St., Moscow, 119034, Russian Federation



Список литературы

1. Abramova I. O., Fituni L. L. (2015) Yashchik Pandory XXI. Vliyanie «afrikanskogo faktora» na mirovuyu ekonomiku i politiku vse eshhe nedootseneno [Pandora’s Box XXI. The Influence of the “African Factor” on the World Economy and Politics Is Still Underestimated]. Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki. No 4(56). Pp. 96–100.

2. Black D. (2006) Mapping the Interplay of Human Security Practice and Debates: The Canadian Experience. A Decade of Human Security: Global Governance and New Multilateralisms (eds. MacLean S.J., Black D.R., Shaw T.M.), Aldershot & Burlington, VT: Ashgate, Pp. 53–62.

3. Booth K. (2007) Theory of World Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Duffield M. (2007) Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples, Cambridge: Polity Press.

5. Duffield M., Waddell N. (2006) Securing Humans in a Dangerous World. International Politics. Vol. 43. No 1. Pp. 1–23.

6. Gerasimova O. (2016) Rossiya – Аfrika: Klondajk vzaimodejstviya. Interv’yu s Fituni L.L. (Institut stran Аfriki RАN) [Russia–Africa: Klondike of Interaction. Interview with Fituni L.L (Institute of African Countries, RAS)]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta Druzhby narodov. Seriya «Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya». Vol. 16. No 2. Pp. 334–349.

7. Green A. (2017) G20 Development Pledges Overshadowed by Climate Rift. Devex.com, July 12, 2017. Available at: http://www.devex.com/news/g20-development-pledges-overshadowed-by-climate-rift-90641, accessed 12.10.2018.

8. Henk D. (2005) Human Security: Relevance and Implications. Parameters. Vol. 41. No 5. Pp. 91–106.

9. Kaldor M., Martin M., Selchow S. (2007) Human Security: a New Strategic Narrative for Europe. International Affairs. Vol. 83. No 2. Pp. 273–288.

10. Kartsonaki A., Wolff S. (2015) The EU’s Responses to Conflicts in Its Wider Neighbourhood: Human or European Security? Global Society. Vol. 29. No 2. Pp. 199–226. DOI:10.1080/13600826.2015.1021242

11. Korendyasov E.N., Sharova А.Yu. (2017) Partnerstvo G20 – Аfrika: povtorenie projdennogo ili obnovlenie? (k itogam sammita G20 v Gamburge) [G20 – Africa Partnership: Repetition or Renew? Follow-up to the Outcome of the G20 Summit in Hamburg)]. Institute of African Countries. Available at: http://www.inafran.ru/node/1476, accessed 12.10.2018.

12. Martin M., Owen T. (2010) The Second Generation of Human Security: Lessons from the UN and EU Experience. International Affairs. Vol. 86. No 1. Pp. 211–224. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00876.x

13. Mckee K. (2009) Post-Foucauldian Governmentality: What Does It Offer Critical Social Policy Analysis? Critical Social Policy. Vol. 29. No 3. Pp. 465–486.

14. Montgomery J. (2018) Spain’s Socialist Government Vows to Dismantle Border Fences Obstructing African Migrants. Breitbart News, June 15, 2018. Available at: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/06/15/spains-socialist-government-dismantle-border-fences-obstructing-african-migrants/, accessed 12.10.2018.

15. Thompson B.C. (2016) The European Union’s Human Security Discourse. The Korean Journal of International Studies. Vol. 14. No 1. Pp. 161–188. DOI:10.14731/kjis.2016.4.14.1.161

16. Tuchman J. (1989) Redefining Security. Foreign Affairs, vol. 68, no 2, Pp. 162–77.

17. Ullman R. (1983) Redefining Security. International Security. Vol. 8. No 1. Pp. 129–153.

18. Youngs R. (2008) Fusing Security and Development: Just Another Euro-platitude? Journal of European Integration. Vol. 30. No 3. Pp. 419–437. DOI:10.1080/07036330802142079

19. Zotin A. (2018) Ekonomika protesta: bor’ba s globalizatsiej. Kak rabochie ob’edinyayutsya protiv autsorsinga [The Economy of Protest: the Fight against Globalization. How Do Workers Unite against Outsourcing. Kommersant. June 24, 2018. Available at: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3663032, accessed 12.10.2018.


Для цитирования:


Kukartseva M.A. The EU’s Humanitarian Policy in Africa and Migration Crisis. Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2019;:46-62. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-5-142-163

For citation:


Kukartseva M.A. The EU’s Humanitarian Policy in Africa and Migration Crisis. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2019;:46-62. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-5-142-163

Просмотров: 36


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)