Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-2-181-196

Abstract

The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk  have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and  western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign  policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since  1952 Turkey has been the member of NATO and at the end of the  20th century made a strong application to become the member of the European Union. At the beginning of the 21st century pro- Western politics began to enter an increasingly obvious impasse.  Tukrey didn’t want to continue being a U.S. agent in the Middle East. However an attempt to play an active role in the region  led Turkey to almost complete international isolation. The  country was not ready a complete break in relations with influential Western allies. The loss of the status of an American agent would inevitably lead to a reduction of Turkey’s military-technical capabilities, and,  consequently, of the political influence that it was achieved in  cooperation with its Western patrons. The author comes to the  concludes that modern Turkey resembles a power which has not  determined its foreign policy priorities. It continues to pursue a  sufficiently risky policy of maneuvering between regional and global players.

About the Author

V. A. AVATKOV
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Pol.), lecturer, Moscow State Institute of  International Relations (University) MFA Russia

76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454



References

1. Avatkov V.A. (2015). Rossiya i Turtsiya: vmeste ili porozn’? Russia and Turkey: together or separately? Moskva: ID Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 278.

2. Avatkov V.A. (2016). Ideologems of Russian foreign policy: 25 years of search, Svobodnaya mysl’, 5 (1659). 27–39.

3. Dolgov B.V. (2000). The Phenomenon of Arab Spring 2011–2016: reasons, evolution, perspectives. Tunis, Egypt, Syria, Algeria: a monograph. Moskva: LENAND. 200.

4. Druzhilovskii S.B., Khutorskaya V.V. (2003). Policy of Turkey and Iran in Central Asia and Caucasus. Mamedova N.M. (ed.). Iran and CIS. Moskva. 37–72.

5. Eremeev D. E. (2016). History of Turkish Social Thought in 11th-21th centuries. Moskva: Kvadriga. 320.

6. Kireev N.G. (2007). History of Turkey in 20th century. Moskva: IV RAN: Kraft+. 608.

7. Kudryashova Yu.S. (2010). Turkey and the European Union: history, problems and perspectives of cooperation. Moskva. 364.

8. Mozloev A.T. (2016) Aggravated Relations between Turkey and Russia: Prospects for Cooperation. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, 2 (47). 49–52.

9. Naumkin V.V., Malvysheva D.B. (eds.). (2015). Conflicts and Wars of 21st Century (Middle East and Norrh Africa). Moskva: IV RAN. 504.

10. Svistunova I.A. (2016). Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East in the XXI century: regional strategy. Problemy natsional’noi strategii, (4). 39–55.

11. Strel’tsov D.V. (ed.). (2013). Territorial issue in the Afro-Asian World. Moskva: ZAO “Aspekt Press”. 319.

12. Vertyaev K.V., Ivanov S.M. (2015). Kurdish nationalism: history and perspectives. Moskva: LENAND. 352.


Review

For citations:


AVATKOV V.A. TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017;10(2):181-196. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-2-181-196

Views: 2277


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)