TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST
https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-2-181-196
Abstract
The political regime of the Republic of Turkey created by Ataturk have always combines two mutually exclusive principles of Islam and western democracy. Fro a long period of time in its foreign policy Ankara has been foolowing the west-oriented vector. Since 1952 Turkey has been the member of NATO and at the end of the 20th century made a strong application to become the member of the European Union. At the beginning of the 21st century pro- Western politics began to enter an increasingly obvious impasse. Tukrey didn’t want to continue being a U.S. agent in the Middle East. However an attempt to play an active role in the region led Turkey to almost complete international isolation. The country was not ready a complete break in relations with influential Western allies. The loss of the status of an American agent would inevitably lead to a reduction of Turkey’s military-technical capabilities, and, consequently, of the political influence that it was achieved in cooperation with its Western patrons. The author comes to the concludes that modern Turkey resembles a power which has not determined its foreign policy priorities. It continues to pursue a sufficiently risky policy of maneuvering between regional and global players.
About the Author
V. A. AVATKOVRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Pol.), lecturer, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia
76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454
References
1. Avatkov V.A. (2015). Rossiya i Turtsiya: vmeste ili porozn’? Russia and Turkey: together or separately? Moskva: ID Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 278.
2. Avatkov V.A. (2016). Ideologems of Russian foreign policy: 25 years of search, Svobodnaya mysl’, 5 (1659). 27–39.
3. Dolgov B.V. (2000). The Phenomenon of Arab Spring 2011–2016: reasons, evolution, perspectives. Tunis, Egypt, Syria, Algeria: a monograph. Moskva: LENAND. 200.
4. Druzhilovskii S.B., Khutorskaya V.V. (2003). Policy of Turkey and Iran in Central Asia and Caucasus. Mamedova N.M. (ed.). Iran and CIS. Moskva. 37–72.
5. Eremeev D. E. (2016). History of Turkish Social Thought in 11th-21th centuries. Moskva: Kvadriga. 320.
6. Kireev N.G. (2007). History of Turkey in 20th century. Moskva: IV RAN: Kraft+. 608.
7. Kudryashova Yu.S. (2010). Turkey and the European Union: history, problems and perspectives of cooperation. Moskva. 364.
8. Mozloev A.T. (2016) Aggravated Relations between Turkey and Russia: Prospects for Cooperation. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta, 2 (47). 49–52.
9. Naumkin V.V., Malvysheva D.B. (eds.). (2015). Conflicts and Wars of 21st Century (Middle East and Norrh Africa). Moskva: IV RAN. 504.
10. Svistunova I.A. (2016). Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East in the XXI century: regional strategy. Problemy natsional’noi strategii, (4). 39–55.
11. Strel’tsov D.V. (ed.). (2013). Territorial issue in the Afro-Asian World. Moskva: ZAO “Aspekt Press”. 319.
12. Vertyaev K.V., Ivanov S.M. (2015). Kurdish nationalism: history and perspectives. Moskva: LENAND. 352.
Review
For citations:
AVATKOV V.A. TURKEY: TURN TO THE EAST. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017;10(2):181-196. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-2-181-196