Communist Party in the Power System of the USSR
Abstract
In this article major mechanisms and different stages of the Bolshevik party’s transformation into a “party-state” are examined. The Communist party has been brought to the surface of political life and power by the Russian revolution; the organizational principles of the Party along with its approaches to political process have to a larger extent evolved as results of the revolution. Therefore the system of power which has reached its peak during Stalin’s rule has both been the product of continuity as well as change of the Russian political tradition. The Communist ideology has served as main instrument of communication between the authorities and the people. The Party occupied central position in that system of communication; one of the most important tools of the Party’s control over the Soviet society was propaganda. However the process of the communist regime acquiring legitimacy has been rather lengthy; it was completed only by the late 1920s. The basic principles of “unity” within a ruling group were rejected when rivalry for power ended in Stalin’s favor. The central element in the Communist party’s system of power was the ruling elite – nomenclature. During World War II the institution of “party- state” has reached the highest degree of centralization; but on the other hand, the decision-making system was rather flexible and adaptable as compared with the previous period. After the War even within Stalin’s dictatorship the contours of oligarchic “collective leadership” were emerging. N. Khrushchev used the same instrument as Stalin did – control over the Party apparatus – while consolidating his power. One of the important results of Khrushchev’s rule was the institutionalization of the ruling bureaucracy. Maintaining “stability” became the slogan for the new stage of the Communist regime’s evolution. Socio- economic system was getting increasingly complex and less manageable; different hierarchies, including local and industrial elites, have been failing to make timely and correct decisions due to their rigidness and sluggishness. The Party was attempting to compensate those deficiencies, but was less and less capable of doing so. Gorbachev’s “Perestroika” which was based on the idea of democratic socialism has finally ended the rule of the “party-state”. Having lost its internal integrity the system of power has rapidly deteriorated.
About the Author
A. Ya. LIVSHINRussian Federation
DSc in History, Professor, School of Public Administration
Address: 27-4, Lomonosovskij Av., Moscow, 119192, Russian Federation
References
1. Akhiezer A.S., Davydov A.P., Shurovskij M.A., Yakovenko I.G., Yarkova E.N. (2002) Sotsiokul’turnye osnovaniya i smysl bol’shevizma [Sociocultural Foundations and the Meaning of Bolshevism], Novosibirsk: Sibirskij Khronograf.
2. Burbank J., von Hagen M., Remnev A. (eds.) (2007) Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700–1930, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
3. Daniels R. (2011) Vzlet i padenie kommunizma v Rossii [The Rise and Fall of Communism in Russia], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
4. David-Fox M. (2015) Crossing Borders: Modernity, Ideology, and Culture in Russia and the Soviet Union, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5. Easter G. (2010) Sovetskoe gosudarstvennoe stroitel’stvo. Sistema lichnykh svyazej i samoidentifikatsiya elity v Sovetskoj Rossii [Reconstructing the State. Personal Networks and Elite Identity in Soviet Russia], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
6. Eisenstadt Sh. (1999) Revolyutsiya i preobrazovanie obshchestv. Sravnitel’noe izuchenie tsivilizatsij [Revolution and the Transformation of Societies], Moscow: Aspekt Press.
7. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2006) Politicheskie elity Rossii: Vekhi istoricheskoj evolyutsii [Russian Political Elites: the Milestones of Historical Evolution], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
8. Geyer M., Fitzpatrick Sh. (eds.) (2011) Za ramkami totalitarizma. Sravnitel’nye issledovaniya stalinizma i natsizma [Beyond Totalitarianism. Stalinism and Nazism Compared], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
9. Gimpel’son E.G. (2000) NEP i sovetskaya politicheskaya sistema: 20-e gody [NEP and the Soviet Political System: 1920s], Moscow: IRI RAN.
10. Gregory P. (2006) Politicheskaya ekonomiya stalinizma [The Political Economy of Stalinism. Evidence from the Soviet Secret Archives], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
11. Keep J., Litvin A. (2009) Epokha Iosifa Stalina v Rossii. Sovremennaya istoriografiya [Stalinism. Russian and Western Views at the Turn of the Millenium], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
12. Khlevnyuk O.V. (2010) Khozyain. Stalin i utverzhdenie stalinskoj diktatury [The Master. Stalin and the Establishment of Stalin’s Dictatorship], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
13. Khlevnyuk O.V. (2015) Stalin. Zhizn‘ odnogo vozhdya: biografiya [Stalin. The Life of One Leader], Moscow: ACT, CORPUS.
14. Khlevniuk O., Gorlizki Y. (2011) Kholodnyj mir: Stalin i zavershenie stalinskoj diktatury [Cold Peace: Stalin and the Soviet Ruling Circle], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
15. Livshin A.Y. (2010) Nastroeniya i politicheskie emotsii v Sovetskoj Rossii: 1917– 1932 gg. [Moods and Political Emotions in Soviet Russia: 1917–1932], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
16. Livshin A.Y., Orlov I.B. (2008) Propaganda i politicheskaya sotsializatsiya [Propaganda and Political Socialization]. Otechestvennaya istoriya, no 1, pp. 99–105.
17. Livshin A.Y., Orlov I.B. (2012) Sovetskoe «propagandistskoe gosudarstvo» v gody II mirovoj vojny: resursnye ogranicheniya i kommunikativnye vozmozhnosti [The Soviet “Propaganda State” during World War II: Resource Constraints and Communication Capabilities]. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, vol. 39, no 2, pp. 192–218.
18. Lowe H.D. (2009) Stalin [Stalin], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
19. Mowdsley E., White S. (2011) Sovetskaya elita ot Stalina do Gorbacheva. Tsentral’nyj Komitet i ego chleny, 1917–1991 gg. [The Soviet Elite from Lenin to Gorbachev. The Central Committee and its Members, 1917–1991], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
20. Najshul’ V.A. (1991) Vysshaya i poslednyaya stadiya sotsializma [The Supreme and Final Stage of Socialism]. Pogruzhenie v tryasinu. Аnatomiya zastoya [Sinking in a Swamp (the Anatomy of Stagnation)], Moscow: Progress, pp. 31–62.
21. Osokina E.A. (1997) Za fasadom «stalinskogo izobiliya»: Raspredelenie i rynok v snabzhenii naseleniya v gody industrializatsii. 1927–1941 [Beyond the Facade of Stalin’s Abundance: Distribution and Market in Supplying the Population During Industrializaion. 1927–1941], Moscow: POSSPEN.
22. Pavlyuchenkov S.A. (2008) «Orden mechenostsev»: Partiya i vlast› posle revolyutsii. 1917–1929 gg. [“The Order of Sword- Bearers”: the Party and the Power After the Revolution. 1917–1929], Moscow: Sobranie.
23. Pikhoya R.G. (2000) Sovetskij Soyuz: istoriya vlasti. 1945–1991 [Soviet Union: The History of Power. 1945–1991], Novosibirsk: Sibirskij Khronograf.
24. Sorokin P.A. (1992) Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society], Moscow: Politizdat.
25. Voslenskij M.S. (1991) Nomenklatura. Gospodstvuyushchij klass Sovetskogo Soyuza [Nomenclature. The Ruling Class of the Soviet Union], Moscow: Sovetskaya Rossiya.
26. Werth N. (2010) Terror i besporyadok. Stalinizm kak sistema [Terror and Disorder. Stalinism as a System], Moscow: ROSSPEN.
Review
For citations:
LIVSHIN A.Ya. Communist Party in the Power System of the USSR. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2018;11(3):13-35. (In Russ.)