Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

A Lesson from two Failed Foreign Investments: the Foreign (Ad)Venture of two Finnish State-Owned Enterprises

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-185-200

Abstract

As an organisational failure may teach more than an organisational success, this article describes the failed foreign investments of two Finnish stateowned enterprises (SOEs), namely Sonera and Stora Enso. In 2000, Sonera acquired a mobile phone licence in Germany and Italy for USD 4,000 million. Two years later, it turned out that the licence was worthless. In turn, Stora Enso acquired an American paper firm for USD 5,000 million in 2000, but seven years later Stora Enso sold this US unit at a loss of USD 2,000–3,000 million. These two cases reveal that the major reason for these failures was the inability of SOE management to predict business development. Other major reasons for failure were the conflicting motives of the management and the company (the main shareholder), and inadequate state control. Passive control of the state may encourage SOE management to exercise adventurous investment policies and take major risks. In Sonera’s case, unrealistic risk taking led to serious financial difficulties, and finally, to a forced sale of the entire group to Telia, the Swedish telecom company. Stora Enso’s stronger financial position saved it from an organisational failure. A lesson to policy-makers: a responsible minister and the minister’s subordinates should exercise a more active ownership policy and keep the political interests of his/her party subordinate to the strategic interests of the state. Recent public discussion on SOE governance in Finland reveals that the Finnish Government still experiences difficulties in fully digesting the wisdom of the OECD Guidelines of Corporate Governance of StateOwned Enterprises. 

About the Author

Kari Liuhto
Pan-European Institute, the University of Turku
Finland

Turku School of Economics

3, Rehtorinpellonkatu Str., Turku, 20500 



References

1. Anastassopoulos J.P., Blanc G., Dussauge P. (1987), State-Owned Multinationals. New York: Wiley. 200.

2. Benito G.R.G., Welch L.S. (1997). DeInternationalization. Management International Review, 37 (2). 7–25.

3. Bruton G [et al.]. (2015). State-owned enterprises around the world as hybrid organizations, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29 (1). 92–114.

4. Cai K.G. (1999). Outward foreign direct investment: A novel dimension of China’s integration into the regional and global economy. China Quarterly, (160). 856–80.

5. Cannon M., Edmondson A. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22 (2). 161-177.

6. Cardon M.E., Stevens C.E., Potter D. R. (2011). Misfortunes or mistakes?: Cultural sensemaking of entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (2). 79–92.

7. Child J., Rodrigues S.B. (2005). The Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical Extension. Management and Organization Review, 1 (3). 381– 410.

8. Choudhury P., Khanna T. (2014). Toward resource independence – Why stateowned entities become multinationals: An empirical study of India’s public R&D laboratories. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8). 943–960.

9. Coad A. (2014). Death is not a success: Reflection on business exit. International Small Business Journal, 32 (7). 721–732.

10. Cope J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (6). 604–623.

11. Cuervo-Cazurra A. [et al.]. (2014). Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8). 919–942.

12. Cui L., Jiang F. (2012). State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: a study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (3). 264–284.

13. Duanmu J.L. (2014). State-owned MNCs and host country expropriation risk: The role of home state soft power and economic gunboat diplomacy. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8). 1044–1060.

14. Knutsen C.H., Ryghand A., Hveem H. (2011). Does state ownership matter? Institutions’ effect on foreign direct investment revisited. Business and Politics, 13 (1). 1–33.

15. Koulumies A. (2010). The assumptions behind an acquisition: Case Stora Enso – Consolidated Papers. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology. 159.

16. Kuisma M. (2016). Valtion yhtiöt. Helsinki: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Siltala. 333. Kuisma M., Seppänen P. (2015). Suomen pahimmat bisnesmokat. Helsinki: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Siltala. 250.

17. Kuznetsov A. (2017). Investment Relations between Russia and the United States. Liuhto K., Sutyrin E., Blanchard J-M. F. (eds.). The Russian Economy and Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Routledge. 43–59.

18. Li J., Xia J. (2017). State-owned enterprises face challenges in foreign acquisitions. Columbia FDI Perspectives, (205). 3.

19. Li M.H., Cui C., Lu J. (2014). Varieties in state capitalism: Outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8). 980–1004.

20. Liang H., Ren B., Sun S. L. (2015). An anatomy of state control in the globalization of State owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46 (2). 223– 240.

21. Liuhto K. (2017). Does Ownership matter in an OFDI Decision of a Russian Firm? The Case of Russia’s Largest Investors Abroad. Liuhto K., Sutyrin E., Blanchard J-M. F. (eds.). The Russian Economy and Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Routledge. 248–265.

22. Majocchi A., Strange R. (2012). International Diversification: The Impact of Ownership Structure, the Market for Corporate Control and Board Independence. Management International Review, 52 (6). 879–900.

23. Mazzolini R. (1979). European government-controlled enterprises: Explaining international strategic and policy decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 10 (1). 16–27.

24. Mazzolini R. (1980). The International Strategy of State-Owned Firms: An Organizational Process and Politics Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 1 (2). 101–118.

25. Meyer K. [et al.]. (2014). Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8). 1005–1028.

26. Negandhi A.R., Thomas H., Rao K.L. K. (eds). (1986). Multinational Corporations and State-Owned Enterprises: A New Challenge in International Business. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press. 315.

27. Pan Y. [et al.]. (2014). Firms’ FDI ownership: The influence of government ownership and legislative connections. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (8). 1029–1043.

28. Ramasamy B. Yeung M. Laforet S. 2012, China’s outward foreign direct investment: Location choice and firm ownership, Journal of World Business, 47 (1). 17-25.

29. Shapiro D., Globerman S. (2012). The international activities and impacts of stateowned enterprises. Sauvan K.P., Sachs L., Schmit Jongbloed W. P.F. Sovereign investment: Concerns and policy reactions. New York: Oxford University Press. 98-144.

30. Sharma S., Mahajan V. (1980). Early Warning Indicators of Business Failure. Journal of Marketing, 44 (4). 80–89.

31. Tepavcevic S. (2015). The motives of Russian state-owned companies for outward foreign direct investment and its impact on state-company cooperation: observations concerning the energy sector. Transnational Corporations, 23 (1). 29–58.

32. Vernon R. (1979). The International Aspects of State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 10 (3). 7–15.

33. Vernon R. (1984). Linking Managers with Ministers: Dilemmas of the StateOwned Enterprise, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4 (1). 39–55.

34. Virta I., Heiskanen M. (2017). Eurooppaan vaikka väkisin. Talouselämä, (45). 24–33.

35. Wang C. [et al.]. (2012). Exploring the Role of Government Involvement in Outward FDI from Emerging Economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (7). 655–676.

36. Watson J., Everett J. E. (1996). Do Small Businesses Have High Failure Rates? Evidence from Australian Retailers. Journal of Small Business Management, 34 (4). 45–62.


Review

For citations:


Liuhto K. A Lesson from two Failed Foreign Investments: the Foreign (Ad)Venture of two Finnish State-Owned Enterprises. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2018;11(1):185-200. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-185-200

Views: 1363


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)