Preview

Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law

Advanced search

The Subjects of Transnational Business and the Processes of Global Economic Governance

https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-52-64

Abstract

In recent decades, transnational business actors have substantially strengthened their role in global economic governance. Although this trend became less pronounced after the global crisis of 2008–2009, it was by no means reversed. With multinational companies (including those from developing markets) increasing scale and scope of their operation and national governments competing for foreign direct investment (FDI) as a development resource, both official and public-private economic governance mechanisms shape their agenda with a reference to transnational business interests. As a result, FDI promotion policies prevailed in post-crisis years, in contrast with a remarkable growth of protectionism in international trade. At the same time, as the case of economic sanctions shows, with increased tensions in international relations business interests are readily sacrificed, and thus far transnational business actors have no reliable tools to change the situation. 

About the Author

Sergey A. Afontsev
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Economic Theory

23, ul. Profsoyuznaya, Moscow, 117997 



References

1. Barfield C. (2017). The Transatlantic Partnership Agreement: An American Perspective. Business and Politics, 19 (4). 549–572.

2. Basedow R. (2017). Business Preferences in International Investment Policymaking. Does European Business Lobby for International Investment Agreements? EUI Working Paper, (MWP 2017/06). 22.

3. Boeger N., Villiers Ch. (eds.). (2018). Shaping the Corporate Landscape: Towards Corporate Reform and Enterprise Diversity. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 424.

4. Broome A. (2014). Issues and Actors in the Global Political Economy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. 344. Global Investment Competitiveness Report 2017/2018.

5. Foreign Investor Perspectives and Policy Implications. (2018). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. 170. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1175-3

6. Khanna P. (2016). Rise of the Titans. Foreign Policy, (March/April). 50–55.

7. Kobrin S.J. (2008). Globalization, Transnational Corporations and the Future of Global Governance. Scherer A.G., Palazzo, G. (eds.). Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 249–272.

8. Ramamurti R., Singh J.V. (eds.). (2009). Emerging Miltinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 460.

9. Russia and the World: 2018. Economy and Foreign Policy. (2017). Moskva: IMEMO RAN. 176.

10. Vernon R. (1971). Sovereignty at Bay. New York: Basic Books. 343.

11. World Investment Report 2008. (2008). Geneva: United Nations. 274.

12. World Investment Report 2017. (2017). Geneva: United Nations. 239.


Review

For citations:


Afontsev S.A. The Subjects of Transnational Business and the Processes of Global Economic Governance. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2018;11(1):52-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-52-64

Views: 1254


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-0240 (Print)
ISSN 2587-9324 (Online)