R.T. Erdogan as an Example of a Charismatic Politician

The article examines the process of formation of identity of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan – a charismatic leader, an adept of “moderate Islamism” one of the founders of the Justice and Development Party. Historically strong centralized authority was always normal for Turkey and the need for Turks in the charismatic leaders is evident even at the present time. Erdogan is stubborn and consistent, thanking to religious education in his family and in religious Lyceum Imam Hatib. He was always religious and since his student years, joined Islamic politicians. In his student years he became the head of the Istanbul Youth organization of the Islamist National Salvation Party, in whose ranks and files he received good practice of a political organizer. The crisis in the ranks of the Islamists after repeated bans of the Islamist party led to a split in its ranks and Erdogan and his associates established the Justice and Development Party (AKP). Creating the AKP, Erdogan and his colleagues received a very important support from the well-known Muslim preacher, writer and philosopher Fethullah Gülen living in Pennsylvania (USA). The political support of Gülen who has millions of followers in Turkey and a well-organized educational system of the “Hizmet” Movement operating not only in Turkey but also in 140 countries helped the AKP to win the elections to the Turkish Parliament. Numerous graduates of private schools, colleges and universities of F. Gülen has occupied leading positions in business, police, juridical structures and the armed forces of Turkey and became supporters of Erdogan. Economic reforms of the AKP has substantially strengthened the Turkish economy, increased the income of the population and managed to cope successfully with inflation. On this ground Erdogan’s credibility consequently grew in the face of voters who saw him a successful leader and skilled politician. However, Erdogan gradually returned to the daily life of Turks the Islamic religion, which caused discontent among the supporters of secular development of the country. Repeated attempts to remove the AKP from power were not successful. Using strong support from F. Gülen’s structures in the judiciary, Erdogan managed to organize high-profile lawsuits against the army leadership, politicians, and journalists – supporters of secular development of the country. In a popular referendum, the army was excluded from influence on the political system of the country. However, constant criticism of the policies of Erdogan from the side of F. Gülen led to the crisis of union between the two leaders. Using the failed coup attempt Erdogan accused in its organization Fethullah Gülen and began a wide crackdown against his supporters.

1. Avatkov V. [et. al.]. (2016). New Stage of Russia–Turkey Economic Relations. Moscow: NPMP RIAC. 33.

2. Avatkov V.A. (2014). Neoosmanizm. Basic Ideology and Geostrategy of Turkey. Svobodnaya mysl’, (3). 71-78.

3. Avatkov V.A. (ed.). (2015). Foreign Policy Discourse of the Leading Subjects of Turkish Politics (2010 – summer 2015). Collective monograph. Moskva: OOO “Pablis”. 88.

4. Avatkov V.A., Druzhilovskii S.B. (2013). Foreign Policy Ideologems of Turkey. Obozrevatel’ (Observer), 6 (281). 73-89.

5. Avatkov V.A., Druzhilovskii S.B., Fedorchenko A.V. (eds.). (2013). RussianTurkish Relations: 2002-2012. Moskva: Izd. MGIMO – Universitet MID Rossii. 150.

6. Bingol Khasan Fatikh. (2010). Russia and Turkey: the energy of cooperation. Interaction in the Sphere of Energy Policy. Moskva: Izdatel’skii dom “Politicheskaya mysl”. 134.

7. Davutoğlu A. (2004). Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. Istanbul: Küre Yayınları. 584.

8. Emel’yanova N. (2008). Private schools in the Turkish educational system. Zaitsev I.V., Ul’chenko N.Yu. (eds.). Turkey at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Centuries. Moskva: IV RAN. 162-179.

9. Gülen F. (2006). Life and Islamic belief. Moskva: “Izdatel’stvo Novyi Svet”. 400.

10. Güncel gelişmeler ışığında Türk dış politikası: zorluklar ve fırsatlar sempozyumu. (2013). Antalya: Uluslararası Antalya Üniversitesi Yayınları. 156.

11. Odzhalan A. (2011). Problems of Democratization in Turkey. Models for the Settlement of the Situation in Kurdistan: “Road ma”. Moskva: “Onebook.ru”. 128.

12. Sarkisyan S. (2012). The Evolution of the Turkish Army in the Context of Political Changes in the Country. 21-i VEK, 5 (25). 53-80.

13. Shlykov P.V. (2011). Waqfs in Turkey: the transformation of a traditional institution. Moskva: Izd. Dom Mardzhani. 560.

14. Stavitskii V.A., Tabasarantsev S.I. (compl.). (2012). Tolerance of Religion and Civilization. Moskva: Ekonomika. 359.

15. Tanaskovic D. (2013). Neo-ottomanism. A Doctrine and Foreign Policy Practice. Belgrade: Cigoja stampa. 102.

16. Turkey: a new role in the modern world. (2012). Moskva: TsSA RAN. 60.

17. Ul’chenko N.Yu., Shlykov P.V. (eds.). (2012). Turkey during the Rule of the Party of Justice and Development. Collection of articles. Moskva: Tipografiya “Vishnevyi pirog”. 238.

18. Vladimirskii A.V. (2014). Great Atatürk. “Father of the people”, “Man of fate”. Moskva: Yauza:Eksmo. 352.