Brexit: Reasons, Political Background, Implications

In the 1960s after the collapse of the colonial empire, the European direction became more important for Britain than relations with overseas territories. For Britain membership in the EEC and subsequently in the EU was a forced measure for the lack of an alternative. Britain gained a strong position in the integration group, but became “an inconvenient partner” in it, demanding special conditions. In the country there was a constant interand intra-party struggle on the “European question”. Eurosceptics were concerned about the country’s loss of national sovereignty and identity, dissatisfied with the social model of the EU in the spirit of social democracy. Euro-optimists considered self-isolation from the continent as disastrous for the country. The logic of integration led to deepening not only economic cooperation, but also political, which caused the rise of europetceptism in Britain in the conditions of the economic crisis of 2008- 2009, the crisis of the Eurozone and the migration crisis. Against this background, Prime Minister D. Cameron was forced to hold a referendum on Britain’s membership in the EU. The results of the referendum on Britain’s membership in the EU demonstrated a split in society: just over half of the British voted for the country’s withdrawal from the EU. The country is divided on social, age, and regional grounds. Not only socially vulnerable, but socially prosperous sections of the population voted for Brexit. As a result of globalization, the former concern immigration, the latter – the shift of economic power to the East. The political consequences of Brexit are serious. The political consequences of Brexit are serious. Scotland, having voted for the EU, is aiming to hold a new referendum on independence, Northern Ireland is wary of closing the border with Ireland. In the political arena, the struggle between eurosceptics and euro-opportunists did not stop, prompting the replacement of the leader and the Prime Minister (Conservative Party) and the aggravation of the crisis in the Labor Party. The successor of D. Cameron as head of the cabinet, T. May had to announce early parliamentary elections, hoping to strengthen the position of the ruling party and supporters of its line on the eve of difficult negotiations on the conditions for Britain’s withdrawal from the EU.

1. Ananieva E. (2016). The hewing center. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, (10). 79-92.

2. Babynina L.O. (2012). Flexible integration into the European Union: Theory and practice of application. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo LKI. 304.

3. Clarke Н.В., Goodwin М., Whiteley P. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 272.

4. Eremina N.V. (2017). The Roots of Brexit: Conflict of Identities in the United Kingdom. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 10 (1). 87-105. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2017- 10-01-87-105

5. Evans G., Menon A. (2017). Brexit and British Politics. London: Polity. 140.

6. Haughton T., Copsey N. (2014). Farewell Britannia? “Issue Capture” and the Politics of Cameron’s EU Referendum Pledge. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52 (51). P. 74-89. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12177

7. Kapitona N.K. (2014). Britain versus the European Union: the evolution of views. Gromyko A.A., Anan’eva E.V. (eds.). Dilemmas of Britain. Search for development paths. Moskva: Ves’ mir. 297-323.

8. Labin D.K., Retyunskii V.S. (2017). Brexit and its Implications for the UK International Investment and Trade Agreements. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, 1 (101). 41-49.

9. Lepenies P. (2016). The Power of a Single Number. New York: Columbia University Press. 208.

10. Molchakov N.Yu. (2017). Constitutional Status of Scotland in the light of the British regionalism. To the Jubilee of the Act of the Union of 1707. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2 (2016). 161-173.

11. Oliver C. (2017). Unleashing Demons: The Inside Story of Brexit. London: Hodder. 448.

12. Peregudov S.P. (1996). Thatcher and Teterism. Moskva: Nauka. 301.

13. Susloparova E.A. (2016). The attitude of Labour Party to European integration. Anan’eva E.V., Budargina A.V. (eds.). The UK EU Membership Referendum. Campaign, results and implications. Part 1. Moskva: Institut Evropy RAN. 49-53.