Political Leadership in Modern France

The paper analyses the relation between political elites and political leaders. It is demonstrated that social shifts in the ranks of the elite are reflected in the profiles of heads of state, and the coming to power of a new president results in the renewal of elites. For years of existence of the Fifth republic several generations of political elite were replaced. At the time of Che. De Gaulle highest public servants were the main political actors. The logic of appointments in the system of executive power changed, a new type of political career was created. During the rule of F. Mitterrand, decentralization expanded the ranks of political elite, strengthened the positions of local elites. The president’s fellow party members came to power, political parties turned into an effective mechanism of recruitment of elite cadres. With E. Macron’s election there was a renewal of the deputy corps; reforms which will lead to further changes in the ranks of elites are planned. The paper investigates political biographies and career paths of presidents of the Fifth republic: the path of a notable, the path of a party functionary and the path of a member of administrative bureaucracy. The path of a notable assumes that the politician starts their career from election in local authorities and gradually works their way up through the ranks of power. The path of a party functionary demonstrates that the politician is rooted in party structures. The path of a bureaucrat assumes ascent to the political Olympus through promotion in the executive power branch and also by entering the immediate environment of the president, prime minister, key ministers. Local rootedness, good knowledge of public administration are characteristic of French presidents. Until recently it was thought that to achieve presidency in France it was necessary to be supported by a strong party. The new French president is an exception to this rule, and the movement he created is not a party in the traditional sense but a network entity. The study further brings to light qualities which the leader has to possess. The role of communication in the life of the French president is explained and it is shown how communication shapes the president’s image and influences public trust in the institution of presidency.

Fifth republic, “republican monarchy”, president, communication, elite, career, Ch. de Gaulle, G. Pompidou, V. Giscard d’Estaing, J. Chirac, N. Sarkozy, F. Mitterrand, F. Holland, E. Macron

1. Attali J. (2016). C’était François Mitterrand. Paris: Pluriel. 448.

2. Behr V., Michon S. (2014). Les facteurs sociaux des carrières politiques des femmes ministres: Une féminisation en trompe-l’oeil. Genèses, (96). 132-156.

3. Birnbaum P. (1994). Les sommets de l’Etat. Essai sur l’élite du pouvoir en France. Paris. 210.

4. Bourricaud Fr. (1953). La sociologie du «leadership » et son application à la théorie politique.Revue française de science politique, 3 (3). 445-470.

5. Chapsal J. (1981). La vie politique sous la V-e République. Paris: PUF. 708.

6. Daver G., Lhomme F. (2016). Un président ne devrait pas dire ça. Paris: Stock. 635.

7. Duhamel A. (2014). Une histoire personnelle de la V-e République. Paris: Plon. 330.

8. Gaulle de Ch. (1999). Les Mémoires de guerre, 1940-1941. Paris: Plon. 443.

9. Gaulle de Ch. (2006). On a sword edge. Moskva: Evropa. 240.

10. Giesbert F.-O. (1996). Le vieil homme et la mort. Paris: Gallimard. 161.

11. Giscard d’Estaing V. (1990). Power and life. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 319.

12. Hartmann M. (2012). Models of education of elite in Europe. Duki A.V. (ed.). Power structures and groups of domination: Materials of the tenth All-Russian seminar “Sociological problems of institutes of the power in the conditions of the Russian transformation”. Sankt-Petersburg.: Intersotsis. 10-39

13. Karpenko K.V. (2016). President of French Republic. Orlov A.G., Slavkina N.A. (eds.). Head of the State in the Foreign Countries. Moskva: MGIMO-Universitet. 89-131.

14. Kastel’s M. (2016). Communication power. Moskva: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 564.

15. Lacouture J. (1998). Mitterrand. Une histoire de Français. Tome 1. Paris: Seuil. 515.

16. Mat’e B. (2014). The Place of President in Franch Institutional System: From Text to Practice. Efremenko D.V., Lapina N.Yu. (eds.). Political institutes of Russia and France: Traditions and present. Moskva: INION RAN. 113-127.

17. Мitterrand F. (1964). Le coup d’Etat permanant. Paris: Plon. 285.

18. Мitterrand F., Banamou G.-M. (1996). Mémoires interrompues. Paris: Odile Jacob. 246.

19. Molchanov N.N. (2011). Unknown de Gaulle: last great Frenchman. Moskva: Eksmo. 448.

20. Rouban L. (2011). Sociologie politique des deputés de la V-e République, 1958- 2007. Les Cahiers du CEVIPOF, (5). 98.

21. Rubinskii Yu.I. (2011). France. Sarkozy’s time. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 317.

22. Teinturier B.(2017). Plus rien à faire, plus rien à foutre. Paris: Robert Laffont. 190.

23. Weber M. (1994). Sociology of religion. Selected works. Image of society. Moskva: Yurist. 78-309.