AMERICAN CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON: HAS DONALD TRUMP CHANGED THE DYNAMIC?
Abstract
To understand the impact President Donald J. Trump might have on civil-military relations in the United States of America, requires a historical dissection and understanding of how the American military came into being and its relationship with political institutions over two centuries. Relying on historical antecedents, the future of the Trump administration’s foreign policy and relations with its military will likely remain stable in status quo terms. However, Trump’s demonstration of a “hands-off” approach to national security strategy appears to have given the US military more autonomy than is typical of most presidential administrations. While this would likely be a dangerous decision in most other countries, the institutional resilience of the American military and its normative and legalistic dedication to the United States government suggests that this newfound authority will likely prove beneficial given the complexity of the international system in the 21st century. Finally, I introduce the concept of post-Civil Military Relations where a military can still be dedicated to the political institutions of the state regardless of perceptions about credibility and legitimacy. Understanding such ideas will provide a framework of how American national security strategy will be developed and executed in the era of President Trump.
About the Author
J. W. MATISEK
Northwestern University
United States
United States
Department of Political Science, Northwestern University
633, Clark St, Evanston, USA, 60208
References
1. Black H.L. (1960). The Bill of Rights. NYU Law Review, (35). 865-881.
2. Brands H.W. (2016). The General vs. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War. New York: Doubleday. 448.
3. Brooks R. (2016). How Everything Became War and the Military Became Everything: Tales from the Pentagon. New York: Simon and Schuster. 448.
4. Calhoun F.S. (1993). Uses of Force and Wilsonian Foreign Policy. Kent (OH): Kent State University Press. 184.
5. Clark J.F. (2007). The Decline of the African Military Coup. Journal of Democracy, 18 (3). 141–155.
6. Cross G. (2012). George Washington: A Biography. San Francisco: Hyperink. 28.
7. Dunlap Ch. J. (1992). The origins of the American military coup of 2012. Parameters, 22 (4). 2–20.
8. Ellis J.J. (2005). His Excellency: George Washington. New York: Vintage Books. 352.
9. Feaver P.D. (2009). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. 400.
10. Feaver P.D. (1999). Civil-Military Relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1). 211– 241. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.211
11. Feldman D.L. (1987). Comparative Models of Civil-Military Relations and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 15 (2). 229–244.
12. Friedburg A.D. (1992). Why Didn’t the United States Become a Garrison State? International Security, 16 (4). 109–137.
13. Høiback H. (2013). Understanding military doctrine: a multidisciplinary approach. New York: Routledge. 271.
14. Huntington S. P. (1957). The Soldier and the State: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. 534.
15. Huntington S.P. (2006). Political order in changing societies. West Haven: Yale University Press. 512.
16. Janowitz M. (1961). The Professional Soldier: A social and political portrait. New York: Free Press of Glencoe. 528.
17. Johnson D.V., Metz St. (1995). American civil-military relations: New issues, enduring problems. Strategic Carlisle (PA): Studies Institute. 36.
18. Kirby J. [et al]. (2015). A Respectable Army: The Military Origins of the Republic, 1763–1789. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons. 241.
19. Kohn R.H. (1970). The Inside History of the Newburgh Conspiracy: America and the Coup D’Etat. The William and Mary Quarterly, 27 (2). 188–220.
20. Kohn R.H. (ed.). (1991). The United States Military under the Constitution of the United States, 1789–1989. New York: New York University Press. 449.
21. Lasswell H.D. (1941). The Garrison State. American Journal of Sociology, 46 (4). 455–468.
22. Lengel E.G. (ed.). (2012). A companion to George Washington. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 678.
23. Maslowski P. (1986). To the Edge of Greatness: The United States, 1783–1865.
24. Williamson M., MacGregor K., Bernstein A. (eds.). The Making of Strategy: Rulers, States, and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 205–241.
25. McMaster H.R. (1998). Dereliction of duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the lies that led to Vietnam. New York: Perennial. 480.
26. Williams T.H. (2011). Lincoln and his Generals. New York: Vintage. 400.
Review
For citations:
MATISEK J.W. AMERICAN CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS SINCE GEORGE WASHINGTON: HAS DONALD TRUMP CHANGED THE DYNAMIC? Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017;10(3):54-67.
Views:
4002
Email this article 