Central Bank Digital Currency Implementation in Nigeria: A Political Analysis

This article attempts to politically analyze the implementation of CBDC in Nigeria. Existing academic literature focuses on the financial and economic aspects of introducing a digital naira. However, the failure of the Nigerian government to implement this project is due to several miscalculations in the political decision to initiate it. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the political aspects of introducing a digital naira in Nigeria in order to develop recommendations for optimizing CBDC implementation in the national economy. The scientific novelty of this study lies in its new perspective on CBDC as an instrument of political control, rather than a solution to financial and economic problems. Furthermore, drawing on a political analysis of the Nigerian precedent, the article offers recommendations for CBDC implementation that are relevant to many countries around the world that are currently developing and testing their own digital currencies. These countries have yet to begin implementing their CBDCs. The methodology of this study is mixed: collected statistical data (World Bank, Global Innovation Index, etc.) are subjected to qualitative analysis based on the principles of monetary theories by G.F. Knapp, J. Brehm’s reactance theory, L. Festinger’s cognitive dissonance theory, S. Tarrow’s resource mobilization theory, and others. Subsequently, conclusions are drawn from the Nigerian precedent of CBDC implementation, and on their basis, recommendations are formulated for the introduction of central bank digital currencies. The practical significance of this study lies in developing recommendations for government agencies facing CBDC implementation: assessing the project’s resource base, preparing society for innovation, selecting the means of project implementation.

1. Avdeev S.V. (2023). The Ratio of the Digital and Non-cash Ruble. A New Form of National Currency. Skif. No. 4 (80), рp. 376–381 (in Russian).

2. Bazaley T.Yu., Eremenko I.V. (2024). The Role of the Digital Ruble in the Communication Aspects of Economic Sanctions and Trade Wars: Prospects for Russia’s Economic Development under Sanctions Pressure. Bulletin of Eurasian Science. No. 5S, рp. 1–15 (in Russian).

3. Brehm J.W. (1989). Psychological Reactance: Theory and Applications. In: Srull T.K. (ed.). Advances in Consumer Research. Provo: Association for Consumer Research, рр. 72–75.

4. Cifrovye valjuty… (2025). Miroshnichenko O.S. et al. Digital Currencies of Central Banks. In: Economic Security of the Country, Regions, and Organizations of Various Types of Activities: Proceedings of the VI All-Russian Forum on Economic Security in Tyumen, Tyumen, April 23–26, 2025. Tyumen: Tyumen State University-Press, pp. 242–253 (in Russian). Dudchenko V.D., Kachur O.V. (2025).

5. Practice of taxation of cryptocurrencies in foreign countries. In: Theory and practice of functioning of the financial and monetary system of Russia: collection of articles of the international scientific and practical conference (twentieth meeting), Voronezh, December 5, 2024. Voronezh: Istoki, рp. 72–81 (in Russian).

6. Festinger L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Stanford University Press, 291 pр.

7. Gorbacheva T.A. (2023). Central Bank Digital Currencies: Foreign Experience. Global Economy and Global Finance. No. 4, рp. 41–47 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2949-6454-2023-0300.

8. Kholodil’nik vs. televizor?… (2017). Shcherbak A.N. et al. Refrigerator vs. TV? Economic Voting in the 2016 Russian State Duma Elections. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science. No. 3, рр. 137–155 (in Russian).

9. Knapp G.F. (2023). State Theory of Money. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House; Saint Petersburg: Center for Economic Culture, 392 pр. (in Russian).

10. Korolev P.A. (2024). “Brave New 1984”: Regime Aspects of Digital (Anti) Utopia. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Political Science. History. International Relations. No. 3, рp. 204–218 (in Russian). DOI: 10.28995/2073-6339-2024-3-204-218.

11. Madojemu M. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Nigeria’s Public External Debt. Economy and Society. No. 3–2 (16), рp. 181–184 (in Russian).

12. Marx K. (1964). Theories of Surplus Value (Volume IV of Capital). Part III. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 26. Part III. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 660 рp. (transl. into Russian).

13. Morgentau H.J. (1961). Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. 3rd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 630 рр.

14. Nnaemeka C.A., Onyine E.O. (2024). Increase in the Number of Suicides Among Nigerians: Risk Factors, Prevention, and Assistance. Consortium Psychiatricum. No. 3, pp. 56–61 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17816/CP15497.

15. Prikhodko D.V., Sherov-Ignatiev V.G. (2024). Digital economy in Africa: state and problems of development. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economics. No. 1, рp. 3–35 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu05.2024.101.

16. Shevchenko I.V., Poddubnaya M.N. (2023). Practice of using cryptocurrencies in modern conditions. Innovative Economy. No. 1, рр. 27–34 (in Russian).

17. Taldykin N.S. (2025). Digital currencies of central banks as a reflection of trends in the development of the global financial system. World Economy and World Finance. No. 4, рp. 109–118 (in Russian). DOI: 10.65324/wewf012.

18. Tarrow S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 328 pр.

19. Zanoskina E.N. (2018). Investment attractiveness and external competitiveness of the Nigerian economy. Scientific Notes of the Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. No. 1, рp. 54–64 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31132/2412-5717-2018-42-1-54-64.

20. Umaru I.G. (2013). A forecast of the dynamic response of the Nigerian economy to the 2007/2008 global financial crisis. SEPTP. No. 9 (2), pp. 237–258.